Comics Reviews (July 1st, 2015)

(8 comments)

Part One: Comics

From worst to best of what I voluntarily paid money for.

Secret Wars #4

It's not even that it's a bad comic. It's just that, well, at this point it's become impossible to read this comic as a separate phenomenon from the overall realignment of Marvel comics (see part two of this post). Here we have what is in effect a brutal rejection of an entire line of thought in Marvel comics that has been going for several years - the Cyclops-as-Revolutionary angle. The comic is explicitly configured to allow Cyclops's vision of fiery rebirth a moment in the sunlight and then to cut it down. Specifically in favor of a Reed vs Doom story. Although with the knowledge that both X-Men and Fantastic Four are being consciously downplayed within Marvel right now for broader corporate reasons, it's tough to see that as a promising dualism either.

The real problem, though, is that I've always wanted to root for the Cyclops-as-Revolutionary angle. I've always thought that challenge to what superhero narratives are was worth exploring seriously and allowing the possibility of moral validity. Hickman turns away from it very, very hard here. I reject that, aesthetically. It's not even that I think Cyclops is morally right. I think that's a functionally meaningless question within the melodramatic metaphysics of a superhero universe. It's that I think Cyclops is a vehicle for giving voice to perspectives superhero narratives don't usually get to explore, and that Hickman gave him depressingly short shrift here.

Yes, there's more issues and this may turn around. But this is a review of this specific issue. And given Secret Wars demands to be read as a meta-commentary on the state of Marvel Comics, I think what it's saying this month is rank fucking bullshit.

Grant Morrison's 18 Days #1

Honestly, I just think it's unfair to ask the world to offer any sort of critical judgment of this, and I'm half-inclined to say that I'm going to buy it and not review it. It's clearly not a major Grant Morrison project. And look, I don't begrudge him taking the money and running, which he's clearly done with this. But this book is a Kirby pastiche reworking of the Mahabharata with an artist who is not Jack Kirby. And a writer who is not Jack Kirby. It's pretty. It's competent. But what on Earth is one supposed to say of it? Morrison is in the backmatter comparing himself favorably to Lord of the Rings and Shakespeare. This issue doesn't stand up to either. But equally, it seems vital to note that the problem is not what the book is - a western comic based on Hindi mythology. The problem is that this is just a Kirby pastiche of novel subject matter.

Ultimate End #3

There's a shell game here, obviously. This book inherits its premise from other bits of Secret Wars. Not all of those bits are out yet. So the precise nature of Manhattan and of this mash-up of the 616 and Ultimate Universes is not yet revealed. I am interested in that question. The problem is, like Jason Aaron's Thor run, it's an intellectual problem, not a story.

Darth Vader #7

We switch to the good stuff for the week, I'm happy to say. Or, at least, what we might call the "good but didn't quite work for me" stretch of reviews. This is capable, interesting, and still a Star Wars comic that I'm buying purely for the fact that I enjoy watching the writer work. In this case he doesn't do anything that immediately grabs me, which is in no way a valid criticism.

Years of Future Past #2

A serviceable comic undermined by the fact that anything X-Men and Secret Wars related is aggressively ephemeral. That's not a problem of course; the demand that comics "matter" is a very silly one based on a misunderstanding of what comics are. The problem, I think, is that Bennett is too restrained as a writer. She's got loads of talent and style - the Colossus monologue page is a brilliant piece of style. She writes a brilliant Magneto. The final page reveal is a massive grin-inducer. But she has a post-apocalyptic team of mutants none of whom have to survive, and this book comes off as timid compared to its canvas.

Chew #50

I can tell that this is a well-structured issue. It's obvious that it's an interesting plot beat to throw at issue #50 of a sixty-issue series. It pays off a lot of stuff. It's clearly a good comic. And I am entirely aware that my problem with this issue is quite literally my problem - one unique to me, and a failing on my part as a reader. That said, it builds to a final page reveal that depends on my being able to identify a character who has no dialogue in this issue. And... I can't. I forget who the blonde woman in Chu's arms is. I don't remember her relationship with anyone. I'm sure she's done stuff in the book and is important, but... nope. Total blank. So the whole thing just sort of... deflates for me. Like I said, my fault. My failing. Still didn't work for me.

A-Force #2

It's interesting to basically watch a book be demoed on a setting other than its actual one. Which is to say, I like A-Force, the comic about female Avengers led by She-Hulk. I like the takes on the major characters. I like the choices of major characters. But this still falls slightly short for me. I think it's because, as an issue, it's kind of vacant. As with Years of Future Past, Bennett (and she would appear to be lead on this issue) doesn't really go for the sort of "and now for the big moment" revelry that the pop comics style she's a best fit for demands. There's no moment that feels like punching the air and saying "that's what I spent my money for." She's good. I think she can deliver some top drawer comics. But she needs to work on that aspect of her game.

The Wicked and the Divine #12

And now we shift to the great stuff. And this is great. Gillen handles the shift away from McKelvie well. Kate Brown is a good transitional artist for this, maintaining the book's basic visual grammar but introducing us to a spin on the premise. But this is a calm between the storms issue; Gillen is running out the clock, going down some side alleys and doing his worldbuilding. But it's an obvious bit of non-misdirection. He's flagging, in a variety of ways, that we're eventually going to circle back to Laura and, by extension, Lucifer. I mean, if nothing else, gee, it's funny how every god who's died so far is an underworld god. I WONDER WHAT THE AFTERLIFE IS LIKE.

Which works. There's a tension of an eventual reveal that infuses a side trip like "let's pay attention to Cass's old assistants for an issue" with a really compelling tension, especially as the larger "who's going to figure out what Ananke is actually up to first" game plays out in the background. As serialize drama, the moving parts are exquisitely put together.

Equally, and again this comes down to "we're judging issues here, not books," Gillen makes a Sandman analogy in the backmatter that's on point. This issue - maybe this arc, but certainly this issue - is one of those side trips like the dead boy detectives in Seasons of Mists or the entirety of World's End - a conscious step away from the main story. And the truth is... well, that's why Sandman works better in trade.

The Unbeatable Squirrel Girl #7

What can I say. Ryan North is funny. He has clever ideas. This book shows that off. There are many highlights, and I will not spoil it for anyone who hasn't read it. Oh, OK. Ratatoskr.

Uber #26

Sheer bravado. Uber's version of "Blackwater" or "The Watchers on the Walls," with an entire issue spent on a single battle. With twenty-five issues of buildup that have screamed loudly that this is not a book that offers a rosy view of war or history, the idea of a major battle testing a sympathetic character's technical capabilities is genuinely terrifying. Uber has taught us to fear, very much, for our main characters. And this issue trades on that, while maintaining an exquisite balance of personal character focus and sweeping historical scope. Small moments and big ones juxtapose. It's awful. It's ugly. It's intriguing. It's brilliant. Fucking hell, this book.

Part Two: The Marvel Previews

From best to worst, with a clear marker of where the stuff I'll buy ends.
  1. Karnak - Well, it'll only be six issues, but this is delightfully batshit.
  2. Ms. Marvel - "Crushed it" indeed.
  3. Spider-Man - Love me some Miles Morales. 
  4. A-Force - Wilson is an autobuy. Love the cast. 
  5. Ultimates - Galactus on a team book by Al Ewing, yes please. Also Miss America. All the yes.
  6. Invincible Iron Man - Bendis on Iron Man sounds a safe bet.
  7. All-New All Different Avengers - Great cast, Waid's a reasonably secure bet as a writer. 
  8. Uncanny Avengers - Have liked enough of what I've seen of Duggan to try this, but Deadpool is worrisome.
  9. New Avengers - Buying entirely because Ewing is an autobuy for at least a first issue, but nothing that grabs me here as such. Squirrel Girl's nice.
  10. Guardians of the Galaxy - Bendis is, ultimately, still an autobuy, although this has hardly been my favorite book of his. 
  11. Contest of Champions - Seems very silly, but I'll always give an Ewing book a shot, as I said, and very silly could be fun.
  12. Spider-Gwen - The abrupt pause in the series after #5 definitely screwed up momentum on this for me, not least because it wasn't a great issue, so this could end up being a jumping off point for me eventually, but it's not yet.
  13. Angela: Asgard's Assassin - As the above reviews suggest, Bennett isn't quite catching for me, but I kind of want to give her more chance, and I am already invested in the plot here. This is the lowest-ranked book to be a definite buy for #1.
  14. Spider-Woman - The premise grabs me, and I have a vague intention of giving Hopeless a try, as I don't think I gave him a fair shake previously, so this is the best bet of where that might happen.
  15. Howard the Duck - Have had enough recommendations for this that I mean to check out the first run. If that's good, will buy this too. 
  16. Sam Wilson, Captain America - Nick Spencer can be good, and I like the idea of a Sam/Steve schism. Give me more premise and we'll see.
  17. Daredevil - Soule is hit and miss, but he does do good lawyers, and the Daredevil/Gambit pair is intriguing.
  18. Web Warriors - Maybe, as I like some of the characters, but I'm pointedly trying to keep my pulls down, and this seems exactly the sort of book I can decide against.
  19. The Totally Awesome Hulk  - I don't know, who is the Hulk? I tend not to like questions like that, but the name charms me.
  20. Venom: Spaceknight - OK, those are not two words I expected to see together, and that raises an eyebrow at least. 
  21. Uncanny Inhumans - Probably not, as I haven't fallen in love with any of Soule's previous Inhumans work, but I'm not saying no.
  22. All-New Wolverine - OK, this doesn't grab me inherently, but mostly because I don't know who Taylor is. I like the art and the premise. The highest-ranked "maybe" for me - everything below this is a 0% chance of my buying it barring new information.
  23. Amazing Spider-Man - Haven't loved Slott's stuff post-Superior Spider-Man, and think this will be my exit from Spider-Man.
  24. Captain Marvel - I haven't gotten to Agent Carter episode two yet, and it's been months, so I don't think this team will win me back.
  25. All-New X-Men - Of the three X-Men books, this is the most promising, not least as I do mean to give Hopeless a try on something, as I said. But with the X-Men line on the whole looking droppable right now, this falls below the plausibility point.
  26. Extraordinary X-Men - Lemire and Ramos are both "not dealbreaker" sorts of creators, so this just sort of leaves me cold, but I do like the feel for an X-Men book. 
  27. Uncanny X-Men - Interesting premise, but I have no faith in either Bunn or Marvel tackling this sort of sinister X-book.
  28. Nova - Gutted to see that this does not feature the awesome Nova family from Infinity Gauntlet. 
  29. Doctor Strange - I don't think I like Jason Aaron's work.
  30. The Mighty Thor - Will be dropping this, as I just don't dig the angle.
  31. Hawkeye - I like the Clint vs Kate premise, but I've not been following post-Fraction Hawkeye, and this doesn't look set to grab me.
  32. Spider-Man 2099 - Glad people who like this have a book.
  33. Star-Lord - Haven't felt a hole in my life without a Star-Lord book before, don't imagine I'll start now.
  34. Old Man Logan - Not the Wolverine book I suspect I want.
  35. Ant-Man - Just sort of the purest distillation of "meh" for me.
  36. Silk - The character hasn't grabbed me yet, and the villainy tone of the solicit leaves me cold. 
  37. Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. - I don't even like the television series.
  38. Drax - Can't see this working for me.
  39. Vision - Don't know the writer, no obvious hook in the premise, not a character that grabs me
  40. Illuminati - this looks utterly not like my thing. 
  41. Deadpool - I don't like Deadpool.
  42. Howling Commandos of S.H.I.E.L.D. - Cute premise, but this seems the embodiment of "cool idea but not a book I would enjoy." Low place mainly due to the appalling resolution of the art, I suspect.
  43. Scarlet Witch - Robinson does not currently interest me, especially not after this shitstorm.
  44. Squadron Supreme - Cannot imagine why I would buy this.
  45. Carnage - I loathe Conway's work. 

Comments

unnoun 2 years, 5 months ago

I am not seeing nearly enough Squirrel Girl on this list. What even is this garbage?

Link | Reply

Alan 2 years, 5 months ago

I stopped collecting comics after Civil War Frontline #11. Nothing that has happened in the nearly ten years since has induced me to start back. BMB's run on Uncanny X-Men came close, but, as I anticipated, it was a 25 issue build up to "hey, let's crap all over Cyclops again."

Link | Reply

Pantswilder 2 years, 5 months ago

**Uber vague spoilers below**
I am curious what you see as the point of the Uber comics as of the end of issue 26? I will happy acknowledge the high level of quality in its production. The writing is excellent, the characters compelling, and the art, while occasionally spotty, really delivers where it counts.

But it seems to be little more than a very well made argument for nihilism at this point. The series relentlessly points out the uselessness of honor, bravery, sympathy, and self-sacrifice in the face of evil's overwhelming strength or just good luck.

The Road was a relentlessly depressing book about the more positive aspects of humanity in the face of unavoidable, unconquerable evil, but it managed to put meaning in the struggle to maintain humanity in the face of that doom. If it had taken the same tack as Uber, the main character would have had 3 children so he could watch helplessly as one at a time they were taken from him despite all efforts to save them, and then eaten slowly before his eyes by the cannibals.

I saw someone else say reading Uber is like an abusive relationship, and that has the hard ring of truth to it. It beats you mercilessly with unrelenting horror. Then it offers you hope, shows you a light at the end of the dark, DARK tunnel, and takes sadistic glee in dismantling that hope in as ugly a way as possible.

****MORE SERIOUS SPECIFIC SPOILERS****
The extremely tight timing and blind luck of the Japanese battleship's appearance in the Battle of Calais beggars belief. As does the idea that for a full 30 minutes of fighting, and despite her much greater speed, durability, and reach, Leah is never able to land a single punch or grab on either Seiglinde or Siegmund? I thought when Gillen said this would be a comic where Galactus always beats Spider man meant that the strong would always beat the weak. But I suppose he meant the evil would always beat the good, regardless of relative strengths.

Though, I guess, he did sort of write himself into a corner. By choosing the very end of the war, and keeping the number of battleships so small but so invincible, he is stuck with a situation where the loss of even a single German battleship battleship or the presence of even a single competent Allied battleship means game over.
I get it, good triumphing over evil is for some other comic. Spiderman does not always beat Galactus. But what is the point? What is this comic proving other than it is possible to abuse your readership and they will come back for more if the pain is packaged well enough?
Because honestly, Uber has made my life in the last week materially worse, and I want to understand why that is okay.

Link | Reply

Philip Sandifer 2 years, 5 months ago

Well, first of all, I'm not sure we can conclude that Uber is nihilistic until, well, Uber concludes. Although even if it is nihilistic... is that a bad position to take on war? Especially on the particular nexus of World War II and superheroes? Even if all Uber amounts to is a condemnation of the poisoned roots of superhero comics... that's hardly a small aesthetic achievement. Certainly it's a critique on new grounds.

I confess that the precise strength mechanics of the Ubers is not something I keep good track of. I appreciate that Gillen has clearly put a tremendous amount of thought into the mechanics and the plausibility of his wargaming, and I think that comes out in the end result, but I don't have anything near the patience to check his math, as it were.

But in the end... I don't think "nihilist" is a flaw in a work of art. I am perfectly willing to embrace well-done nihilism.

Link | Reply

Philip Sandifer 2 years, 5 months ago

To be fair, it's not Bendis that took the final crap here.

Link | Reply

Pantswilder 2 years, 5 months ago

Firstly, thank you very much for responding! I have had very little luck finding anyone to discuss this comic with. And it has had a very powerful effect on me that I really wanted to explore.

I have some nits to pick with the supposed plausibility of the wargaming*. And I guess I am not sure what you mean by the "poisoned roots of superhero comics". What exactly is the issue with Jewish kids in New York writing stories about powerful good guys protecting the weak from evil? And why would World War 2 be a good setting for exploring nihilism? World War 1 fits the bill, a horrific, monsterous, grinding conflict filled with futility and horror started for no real reason and ultimately accomplishing nothing but setting the stage for World War 2. But World War 2 itself? It is the best, and possibly only, example in human history of a war that is clearly a fight between good and evil, and good won.

*Mostly the large numbers of new ubers the Germans produce AFTER the Battle of Berlin, compared to the Allies. Germany's economy and infrastructure were smoking ruins in April 1945, while the US economy at the time was producing 2-4 times what Germany was able to produce at the height of their power. America had the money, manpower, infrastructure, population buy-in, and institutional organization to test huge swaths of their population and the industrial power and natural resources to massively produce catalyst.
Germany on the other hand, while assuredly having a huge up-swell of patriotic fervor following the appearance of the Ubers, faced massive breakdowns in every area of their national structure. Certainly that would have turned around with the victory in Berlin, but it would have taken time to build factories and create a mass testing program.
And thanks to Freya's sabotage, Germany and the western allies are starting from the same place production-wise in May, just with Germany having ~1000 ubers including 3 battleships already made. If Sankt was able to produce 1000 ubers in a couple years in secret with the budget one imagines granted an unsuccessful weapons program, the fully awakened American giant with six months should have had many times that number ready for Calais. But this is just a long-winded nit. My problem with the comic goes beyond internal consistency.

Link | Reply

Philip Sandifer 2 years, 5 months ago

Ultimately, I think a lot of the point of Uber is to challenge the idea that World War II is "the good war." Not, mind you, to challenge the idea that the Nazis were evil as fuck. It's *very* unambiguous on that point. But to challenge the idea that opposing evil constitutes goodness, and to look at a lot of the assumptions about power that underly superhero comics. (The Superman/Ubermensch parallel being an oft-observed one.)

So I suppose my answer would be that I think your discomfort and unease is a sign that the comic is working as intended.

Link | Reply

Jeff Heikkinen 2 years, 5 months ago

I agree on Robinson not being terribly interesting, but not on the linked article being a good reason for avoiding him. All it shows is that he wrote something in which a character uses some anti-trans slurs. There doesn't seem to be any indication, in the excerpts given, that Robinson endorses these views. If anything, what little we see of his other characters suggests they think the slur-using character is a bit of a dick.

Link | Reply

New Comment

required

required (not published)

optional

Recent Posts

Archive

Tags

Authors

Feeds

RSS / Atom