Nikola Tesla’s Night of Terror Review

(62 comments)

Were I of a cynical mind, I might suggest that the show is in dire straits when a great man of history story that proclaims the future to belong to a white guy and suggests that it’s good to be a billionaire stands out as a relative highlight of the season. Except we all know that the show is in embarrassing shape, with a showrunner who continues to struggle with the notion of aboutness in narrative. Why take an episode whose sins all fall under the heading of “basically the same shit the program does in all its celebrity historicals” and complain about that when it breaks a five episode streak of the show breaking down in far more fundamental ways?

All of which is to say that “Nikola Tesla’s Night of Terror” is pretty good, which is to say that it has the basics down in a way nothing since “It Takes You Away” has really come close to. There’s a refreshing sense of conceptual unity—the conflict between Tesla and Edison, where Tesla is a visionary inventor and Edison a more cynically pragmatic and business-oriented sort, is mirrored by the technological scavenger villains. There’s a sense of actually getting the guns on the mantleplace to go off—Wardenclyffe is introduced early on, then becomes a cool location for a last stand. Tesla’s message from Mars (a real historical detail) is brought up, then made use of. And the basic ideas are just fun. Tesla is an obvious choice of historical figures for Doctor Who to do—an opportunity to do a big steampunk romp that matches well with Whittaker’s more “get her hands dirty working on stuff” character, at least when they remember to have that be a trait. 

There are oddities, but most of them aren’t the fault of this script. Even in the hands of a competent writer, three companions turns out to simply be too many to make work in a fifty minute episode when you also have to introduce a bespoke world. Nobody is well-served here, and it mostly feels like you could give different scenes to different people with no real substantive changes to the episode. The cast is unwieldy and everyone is suffering from it. There’s also a bizarre lack of consistency to the Doctor’s characterization as her pacifism goes out the window in order to have her revel in the potential destruction of an alien race. Guns remain bad, but giant lightning-shooting towers are great. But this is largely a good change to the character, whose passivity and lack of willingness to confront evil has been a major problem. Sure, it’s weird to see copyright infringement be the hill upon which she’ll kill, but the fact remains that this is Whittaker’s most (forgive me) electrifying villain confrontation yet.

In the end, though, the cynicism is inescapable. This is a daft celebrity historical romp. It’s the best story of the season to date, but that just means that this is a season where the daft historical romps are the standout highlights. That’s bad and depressing. And it’s ultimately not as though the ambient context of semi-competent drudgery actually improves this. I mean, I’ll probably get a better Eruditorum post out of it than anything around it, but this is still little more than a competently done iteration of what is usually one of Doctor Who’s most tediously obligatory subgenres. (It’s notable that Moffat quietly junked the format during the Capaldi era.) That’s worth celebrating, but it really shouldn’t be.

 

  • The guest cast in this is quite strong. Goran Višnjić’s Nikola Tesla is basically just a Robert Downey Jr, impression, which is a choice that’s obvious because it works, and he carries it off with the requisite charisma. Robert Glennister’s Thomas Edison is emphatically a piece of shit, meanwhile, which is, to be fair, a relatively satisfying note for the show to take with a Great Man of History.
  • For my money, however, the standout is Anjli Mohindra as Queen Skithra. Mohindra, previously best known within Doctor Who as Rani on Sarah Jane Adventures, launches a full-on attack on the scenery that, along with the delightful decision to have the Skithra be rubbish at chasing people because they keep tripping over each other, single-handedly elevate the Skithra above any Chibnall-era monster since the P’ting.
  • There seems to have been a decision to give Bradley Walsh a larger helping of lame comedic bits. This is mostly unfortunate, although his desperately incompetent attempt at explaining who Tesla was is rescued by Cole and Gill’s amused exasperation at his efforts. 
  • I’m terribly excited for Prisoner of the Judoon, although the news that Chibnall rewrote his best writer from last season is a bit wince-inducing. 
  • That said, schedule for the next two weeks will be a bit odd. I’m flying to the UK for a vacation on Sunday (I would love to see you, but alas unless we’ve already made plans my six days there are fully booked)—the first time I’ve been there since I was writing about the Key to Time saga. (Amusingly, it will be the second time I return home to immediately write about The Invasion.) Anyway, if my hotel TV has a nice, sensible way for me to pull up the previous day’s episode of Doctor Who then I’ll watch it Monday to stave off the jet lag. If it doesn’t, then I won’t be able to watch it until I get home the week of the 2nd, and that week will just contain two reviews. Either way, I’ll have no way of watching Praxeus until Monday. Other than that, however, posting will continue apace whilst I’m abroad. 

Rankings

  1. Nikola Tesla’s Night of Terror
  2. Orphan 55
  3. Spyfall

Comments

Annie 5 months, 2 weeks ago

If there is one good thing we can say about signal, it's that he is introducing more female writers.
As for the doctors pacifism, I guess they realise they couldn't keep it consistent because there will be no way to get rid of the villains, but it does lead to situations where for example refusing to fight in World War II is considered noble but killing the scorpion people is okay.

Link | Reply

Corey 5 months, 2 weeks ago

"If there is one good thing we can say about signal"

He's more Noise than Signal. #thankyouillbehereallweek

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

They were ugly and nonhuman, so obviously it's okay to kill them!

Although I find it interesting that the villains ultimately escape instead of being destroyed. Had this been a Tennant episode, the ship would've been blown up. But with the pacifist 13th Doctor we can't have that, even though the Skithra seem like a villain that would certainly come back for revenge after such a humiliation.

Link | Reply

Aristide Twain 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I really don't know how intentional it is, but the inconsistency between what the Doctor professes and what she actually does seems like it works really well with Moffat's idea of the Doctor as "a flawed person called Theta Sigma who tries very hard to an idealized picture of 'the Doctor' that they have in their head".

Link | Reply

Homunculette 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Huh, lucky timing means I checked this immediately after it posted. I usually accidentally come to these very late so that’s nice.

The most frustrating thing in this episode to me (aside from the billionaire stuff) is the fact that the Doctor apparently doesn’t even consider wiping Tesla or Edison’s minds, making the Ada mindwipe where she begs the Doctor to stop even more horrific and baffling.

I haven’t seen anyone else say this, but it seemed to me they made Edison into a straight Trump analogue (or at least he was played that way). I like that move a lot, but Chibnall sure seems to like having Trump surrogates wander around his seasons.

To me the biggest improvement this season is the Doctor. Part of it is Whittaker’s performance and part of it is the writing, but there’s much more of a character present than there was last season.

What would we think of this if it was in the Capaldi era? Would it be a forgettable cast-off or would people feel positive towards it? I have no idea how much we’re grading the Chibnall show on a curve.

Link | Reply

(Not That) Jack 5 months, 2 weeks ago

The Doctor not mindwiping Tesla and Edison was the moment I gave up on Chibnall's Doctor Who. It's clearly never going to have anything remotely resembling narrative consistency, and while I'm not one to worry about some things-last week's not fitting into any known future didn't bother me, since fitting into any future hasn't ever really been the show's thing, for example-this kind of thing just drags me out of it.

Great men of history get to keep their memories. Great women lose their memories and get told "good luck" when history knows they die horribly. Nah, fuck that. I'm out.

Link | Reply

Yossarian, Duck! 5 months, 2 weeks ago

If Robert Glennister doesn't have his Trump impression down by now, it'll be a waste once we get to the slew of post-2016 biopics.

Link | Reply

AndyRobot 5 months, 2 weeks ago

"What would we think of this if it was in the Capaldi era? Would it be a forgettable cast-off or would people feel positive towards it? I have no idea how much we’re grading the Chibnall show on a curve."

Honestly - I think we'd think more highly of it. You'd have the 12th Doctor pulling his "planet of the pudding brains" routine while addressing why no one listened to Tesla. (There's a reason Tesla and Mark Twain got on famously in real life; cynical funny curmudgeons need hyperfocused optimistic dreamers and vice versa.) You'd have fewer companions to juggle, and one of them would be Clara or Bill. Nardole could handle the Graham/Ryan role. You'd have a Doctor willing to tell off Edison properly.

Darren on TheM0vieBl0g nailed it this week; his summation seemed to be that this was a perfectly good, solid episode of Doctor Who that had the misfortune of being made in the Chibnall era.

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

"here's a reason Tesla and Mark Twain got on famously in real life" Does anyone else remember a TV show called "Legend"? It was on the debut season of the now defunct UPN and starred Richard Dean Anderson and John DeLancie as fictionalized versions of Twain and Tesla wandering around the Old West having Steampunk adventures. It only lasted one season because the only thing that lasted on UPN was ST: Voyager which had a built-in fanbase, but it had its moments.

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Interestingly, while Edison was a capitalist bastard (as he mostly was in real life), the story gives him surprisingly good coverage. Unlike Trump (or the Trump expy from Arachnids in the UK), Edison is genuinely shocked and horrified by the deaths of his employees. And, IMO, he displays the only real cleverness anyone has shown so far this season when he immediately realizes that he can evacuate the streets by starting a panic about Tesla.

Link | Reply

Jesse 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I found it bland. I wasn't sure it was possible to do a bland story about Doctor Who meeting Nikola Tesla, but here we are.

Anyway: Isn't it fascinating that the Doctor knows exactly what will happen to Tesla for the rest of his life? Wasn't she just telling us last week that there are many possible timelines & the future depends on the choices we make now? Oh, well; hobgoblins, little minds, etc.

Link | Reply

Aristide Twain 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I'm fairly sure the future's only in flux past the early 21st century, and anything up to the real-life "present day" is supposed to remain nailed down. Which is, of course, how it's always worked, even if it makes little in-universe sense for that to actually be how the Doctor knows it to work.

But if you need a rational in-universe explanation, "The Book of the War" has something about how the 21st century is a cutoff point past which it stops making much sense to try and tell human history, because that's when humanity explodes into a billion posthumanities with their own histories, some of them becoming time-active on their own. So there's that as a precedent.

Link | Reply

Kate Orman 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Nice to see the Racnoss again.

Link | Reply

TheMagister 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I didn't remember the Racnoss name, but the entire time during the episode I just kept thinking "Were they named the Skithra? No, I'd remember...but they had to have been, they're CLEARLY the same!"

Is this alien racism or lazy alien design?

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I thought we were meant to think that the two arachnid species are related.

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I know!

Link | Reply

Mikey 5 months, 2 weeks ago

From a meta perspective, doing an episode about people (and alien races) ripping off ideas was quaint given Chibnall’s penchant for ripping off the Russell T Davies era.

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I was oddly reminded of that weird ST: TNG episode where Geordi was kidnapped by a race of aliens conceptually similar to the Skithra in that they were conceived as "really stupid aliens who steal all their tech b/c they're too stupid to make their own."

Link | Reply

Rodolfo Piskorski 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I thought Orphan had much more conceptual unity than the blunt, one-note aliens=Edison of this one.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

This was competent in every aspect and had good dialogue. Under RTD, this would've been on par with, say, "The Shakespeare Code". And yet it immediately gets to be in my top 3 Chibnall era episodes because for 50 wonderful minutes, I got to forget how shitty and non-functional the Chibnall era is because it actually worked. Which is depressing as fuck, but that's the world we live in.

In a way, Nikola Tesla is the perfect historical figure for the 13th Doctor to meet. Nice, intelligent, sweet, quite humble, ineffective and ultimately inconsequential. He's an inventor with many ground-breaking ideas and no inventions that shaped the future (or at least that's how the episode presents it). He's a great man of history that never got to be great, remembered for his potential rather than his achievements. He could very well be an inspiration for her whole character.

(Also, much like Rosa Parks, he is commemorated in the show as a name that gets attached to a future object that's floating in space: an asteroid, a car. Something that's far away and can't be touched. Interesting.)

As for the TARDIS team, I agree they're unwieldy, but for me this was literally the first episode of the Chibnall era where they worked. Everyone got to do something, everyone had at least some character that extended beyond their plot functions. Ryan got to bond with Tesla's assistant and to find similarities between them. Yaz got to feel bad for Tesla and support him. Graham got to be Graham (he was always the most developed one). And they all got a lovely scene where they're just excitedly listing bits of New York they'd like to see. No obvious plot function, just companions enjoying their surroundings. It shouldn't feel like a breath of fresh air, but it really did.

(Also, Tesla's assistant reminded me visually of Missy. Sigh. What happened to that show I loved?)

I'm not even gonna comment on the Doctor not wiping Tesla's and Edison's minds, but if she's not doing that, why not at least tell Tesla he's going to be remembered? That's what almost every other famous historical person to meet the Doctor got. Not to mention that just leaving Tesla to slowly decline and die penniless seems cruel. With Noor Inayat Khan we can handwave and say "oh, it was the war, that's a big historical event, the Doctor can't interfere". With van Gogh, we had his mental ilness that the Doctor was unable to cure, and thus was unable to change the course of his life. But with Tesla there's no such explanation.

Also, apparently the device Twelve installed in New York in "The Return of Doctor Mysterio" worked because Thirteen's hopping all around the city with no problems whatsoever. So she could visit Amy and Rory! Imagine Amy realizing she was replaced with Cop, Dyspraxia and Cancer.

Link | Reply

Rodolfo Piskorski 5 months, 2 weeks ago

It was okay, but after the emotionally stirring and epic Spyfall, and the intriguing and challenging Orphan 55, this felt flat.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I've been so starved for "competent" these past few years that this episode genuinely gave me joy. I'll take "flat", give me more "flat". That's how I miss basic quality in my DW.

Link | Reply

Bedlinog 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Tesla wasn't such a sweetie in real life. He was into eugenics, and wrote: "we continue to keep alive and to breed the unfit. The only method compatible with our notions of civilization and the race is to prevent the breeding of the unfit by sterilization and the deliberate guidance of the mating instinct."

Something which the Doctor forgot to mention, in her enthusiasm for selling Tesla as "the guy who invented wi-fi" for the kids watching.

Just wondering: is Tesla the first person with actual Nazi views to get a thumbs-up from the Doctor?

Link | Reply

TomeDeaf 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Nah, that's Churchill.

Link | Reply

AndyRobot 5 months, 2 weeks ago

To be fair, a lot of generally moral, intelligent people back then were "eugenics-curious", as it were. (W.E.B DuBois, for one, and George Bernard Shaw, too.) It's not hard to see why; if you approach it from the perspective of trying to improve mankind and end suffering, there's a certain logic to it.

And, well, then the Nazis showed up and actually put it into practice and people started realizing that giving *anyone* the authority to decide what genetic traits are worthy of extermination is not a very good idea at all, even if you're nice.

Link | Reply

Voord 99 5 months, 2 weeks ago

In a way, Nikola Tesla is the perfect historical figure for the 13th Doctor to meet. Nice, intelligent, sweet, quite humble, ineffective and ultimately inconsequential...He could very well be an inspiration for her whole character.

I think this is a sharp observation. And it connects to something else, perhaps.

On the one hand, the story certainly is, broadly speaking, framing the Skithra as parallels to Edison, in order to idealize Tesla.

But Metivier also goes out of her way to differentiate Edison from the Skithra. Two moments are particularly important: one, the bit where Edison turns out quite genuinely to care about the people who work for him, and two, the point at which he’s given the space to articulate a case for himself and against Tesla, that brilliant ideas are worthless if they don’t actually result in something.

(Edison’s superficially unsavory qualities also save lives in the episode, when he repurposes his propaganda campaign to get people out of the streets. And so on.)

This lends itself to a reading in which Edison is the mean between the extremes of the Skithra on the one side, and Tesla on the other, which is a reading that favors Edison. From that perspective, this would be a much more effective and coherent right-wing argument than Kerblam! was.

But OK, the episode clearly seems to be on Tesla’s side and against Edison. Well, the Doctor is — but, as you point out, she would be, wouldn’t she? A lot turns here on our willingness to accept this particular Doctor as an authoritative voice on this particular point. On that point, it’s striking that the episode parades once again this Doctor’s incoherent objection to guns and goes out of its way to show that Edison’s gun is very useful.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

That's a fascinating reading, I love it. It's almost as if the episode secretly wants to side with Edison. But it can't, because that would reveal the fatal flaw of the 13th Doctor that the Chibnall era refuses (is unable?) to acknowledge: the fact that she clearly values people's intentions more than their actions.

Link | Reply

Aristide Twain 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I don't see that that's a flaw. Intentionalism is a perfectly valid moral system. It's very *impractical* to base practical decisions on that, but in terms of who she'll agree to like or value, I would say that if anything, giving the Doctor a coherent moral philosophy for once might be a good thing, or at least an interesting thing to try.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

To each their own, I guess. I much prefer a Doctor who's able to stand up to evil to a Doctor who has a coherent moral philosophy.

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I have mentioned before my theory that Chibnall is a conservative whose trying to pass himself off as a progressive because he assumes that's all the audience is looking for.

Also, isn't is a perfect commentary on the Chibnall era that they set out to do a Tesla story with Edison as the villain that ended up making a fairly strong pro-Edison case?

Link | Reply

taiey 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I thought "Rosa" used the whole cast well.
You know, a whole season back...

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

You're right, "Rosa" too. One more parallel between these episodes.

Link | Reply

Voord 99 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I think that’s true, but I think part of that is that Rosa was to a significant degree about the emotional reactions of the three human characters to the situation. (The Doctor is comparatively marginal to Rosa - what works about it would work if you used any mechanism to transport Yaz, Ryan, and Grahame to the past and left them there for a bit.). It is one of the episodes of the new series to which the details of the plot are least relevant to its effect.

Most episodes just don’t have the room to accommodate four main characters and do the other things that they need to do, I think. Even under the quite different circumstances and expectations of the old series, the Davison era did not manage it well. Even three strains the new series - there have often been two companions, but when that was the case, there was a clear hierarchy in which one of the two was more important than the other.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Good point about "Rosa" - I never thought about it like that.

It's strange, though, that the Chibnall era seems to have settled on Graham being the most important companion and Yaz being the most disposable one. There was so much potential for an exploration of female Doctor-female companion dynamics.

Perhaps a way to make these three companions work would be to make them a family. Graham as a dad/granddad, Yaz as a mom (with an older actress playing her to avoid problems) and a younger Ryan as a child/teenager (from the way he was presented, I've always felt he was originally supposed to be one). Or Graham with two grandchildren. That way at least the writers wouldn't have to keep inventing their characters and plot functions over and over again.

Link | Reply

AuntyJack 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Speaking of Yaz - seems like all of the writers have forgotten she was trained as police - nothing in her behaviour or dialogue reflects it at all.

Link | Reply

Mikey 5 months, 2 weeks ago

There’s some good observations here. I particularly liked:

“(Also, much like Rosa Parks, he is commemorated in the show as a name that gets attached to a future object that's floating in space: an asteroid, a car. Something that's far away and can't be touched. Interesting.)”

Obviously it’s entirely unintentional, but a nice piece of synchronicity, nonetheless. It’s these completely unintentional meta elements which are the most interesting part of the last two seasons for me, given the stories themselves are almost entirely bereft of any original ideas or genuine substance. El Sandifer might yet have something to work with when the time comes to write up the era.

Link | Reply

Sleepyscholar 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I'm watching out of duty/habit/whatever nowadays, and all I can do is look for small moments to try to seize some pleasure from. I, too, liked the Skithra getting in each other's way in the chase, and thought it was sharp on a couple of levels: on the one hand, they were clearly so fast that they would easily catch up were it not for this trait, and I also felt that it said something about them: that they undermined themselves with their own competitiveness. I much prefer villains like this, that express some sort of trait, even if it makes them slightly crap.

Link | Reply

Rodolfo Piskorski 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Can we all at least agree that Goran Višnjić was amazing?

Link | Reply

David Claughton 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Definitely a thumbs up from me...

Funny thing - in my comment speculating about multiple timelines on the Orphan 55 review, I very nearly namechecked "Timeless" as an example of a series that really leans into the idea of changing the timeline ... and the very next episode Goran (who plays Flynn in Timeless) strolls in!

Sometimes I think coincidences like this follow me around :-)

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Timeless... like a Timeless Child!

(Yeah, I enjoyed Goran Višnjić's performance a lot).

Link | Reply

kevin merchant 5 months, 2 weeks ago

At some points, he came across spookily like the Doctor.

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Nicola Tesla is a steampunk icon. /Of course/, he came off as Doctorish, since most iterations of the Doctor are essentially "brilliant Victorian inventor" which is pop-culture Tesla in a nutshell.

Link | Reply

Bennett 5 months, 2 weeks ago

This was good. The guest performances were great, the script was tight, and the direction delivered (I was particularly taken with the Niagara and train sequences).

But I was hankering for a historical embued with a stronger sense of genre, having been misled by this episode's title. Genre hopping is one of my favourite things Doctor Who does, but even though I recognise the attempt (hello Spyfall) I'm just not feeling the episodes deliver it.

Obviously there is a different approach at play than Davies' one-word tone meetings, or the movie poster ideas of Series 7. And that's not necessarily a bad thing, I just miss getting those episodes where Doctor Who becomes prey to every cliché-ridden convention and delights in it.

Also, I was a little miffed at the description of a Silurian blaster as an "alien" weapon but I recognise that is just the type of fannish pedantry I shouldn't let myself get distracted by, and there's a million justifications for it.

Link | Reply

Voord 99 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I don’t know. I’m actually cautiously drawn to this era’s move away from the Moffat era’s stance that the past should be approached overwhelmingly through the lens of immediately recognizable previous fictional depictions of the past. It’s part of why Demons of the Punjab was on balance the best thing about the last season for me.

Link | Reply

AntonB 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Chibnall is bringing me ever closer to a 'Twin Dilemma' moment. (The episode of the classic series where I just couldn't anymore) it's only a matter of which episode it's gonna be.

Link | Reply

TheWrittenTevs 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I am genuinely surprised how much of a boon the destruction of Gallifrey has been to the series. For the second week in a row, one of the best bits of the episode was Whitaker's Doctor who's becoming spikier, less forgiving and generally more dynamic as a character. After an entire series which apparently feels the need to justify itself whenever its main character takes an action to achieve a result, Chibnall’s apparently decided that his one excuse now if going to be “she’s angry over Gallifrey” and leave it at that. Simple but effective; I don’t know why you’d create a Doctor where you have to nuke their home planet in order to make them act Doctorly, but if that’s what’s required to get Chibbers to give Whitaker some actual material, then fair enough. We only go to Gallifrey once every few seasons; I think I can live without it.

Link | Reply

Prole Hole 5 months, 2 weeks ago

This. I think the difference this season is the Doctor actually has interiority and it makes a HUGE difference. I'm not laying the failure for not having this last season at Whittaker's feet - she does her best but even Peter Capaldi couldn't have made dreck like "Arachnids In The UK" sing. But this season she's being given scenes which actually allow some nuance and variety to her performance and it becomes clear why Whittaker was cast - she's a terrific actor who can actually deliver when the writer gives her something worthwhile to do. Even something as simple as the way the Doctor casually but very specifically deflects questions about her origin at the end of "Spyfall Pt 2" despite claiming to be opening up about them to assuage her companions fears gives Whittaker space to develop her performance. For all that the episodes themselves continue to fluctuate wildly in quality I am loving the way the 13th Doctor is coming together this season.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I don't mean to spoil anyone's enjoyment of Whittaker in the role, but I couldn't disagree more. There were several scenes in this very episode, most notably her weirdly flat expression when she talked about understanding Tesla's excitement about his ideas, where I thought "this Doctor has, like, 3 facial expressions".

Link | Reply

AndyRobot 5 months, 2 weeks ago

It's the first episode in a long while to really chime thematically, which DW used to do regularly back in the Davies and Moffat eras. At no point does it blatantly undermine its own message (mostly - see below). It knows what it's about, and - like Van Gogh fighting an invisible (disability)monster and Shakespeare fighting witches with words - having Tesla face off against monsters that steal technology and exploit geniuses is perfect. It's Celebrity Historical 101, and the only reason not to include *some* sense off mirroring is when you're making "Rosa" and you really don't need to (which, arguably, is one big reason Krasko didn't work.)

Is it just me, though, or... is this era so allergic to the concept of "About-ness" that the "Historical Figure's Big Challenge/monster's main defining feature" mirror trick here was struggling to make itself heard? Like, it was a *little* too low in the mix, there was a little too much else going on, and Edison's presence in the story as a reluctant ally kind of undermines it a little, since the only way for this to *really* pay off dramatically and emotionally would be for Edison to suddenly have an "oh s**t, it me!" realization when he's face to face with the scorpion lady from another planet, and somehow /that/ would be even /less/ historically accurate than the phrase "Thomas Edison comes face to face with a scorpion lady from another planet."

Link | Reply

Andrew 5 months, 2 weeks ago

This was such a huge step up from last week in terms of plotting, directions, and general production values. I would describe it as a solid, fun episodes with only a few contrivances to sour the taste. So far this season is batting 3/4 - not too bad.

Once again the companions as just kind of there instead of driving the plot. I was disappointed that we didn't get to see Yaz's police training when she was attempting to get people to move inside. Only the other hand, her failure did lead to an amusing character moment for Edison.

I wonder how the bad guys managed to acquire a silurian weapon from the slumbering silurian's (who are not really alien's despite what the Doctor says).

Link | Reply

Alan 5 months, 2 weeks ago

"I wonder how the bad guys managed to acquire a silurian weapon from the slumbering silurian's (who are not really alien's despite what the Doctor says)." Dinosaurs on a Spaceship established that some Silurians fled Earth before "the Great Disaster."

Link | Reply

Andrew 5 months, 2 weeks ago

D'oh. That's what I get for trying to out-pedant the Doctor Who production team.

Link | Reply

Paul F Cockburn 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Actually, I'd suggest that the Silurians are indeed "aliens"—in that they're not homo sapiens, and the Doctor was explaining the situation to humans at the time.

Mind you, that was a moment when I thought: "Oh, they couldn't afford to build a new "alien gun" for this episode, so just went for the first thing they could find in the store-room." Is that me just being a tad cynical?

Link | Reply

Annie 5 months, 2 weeks ago

Oh, one thing I also liked about the episode was that it showed that immigrants contribute positively to society.
There is a scene where Tesla tells people that he is an American citizen and that they are standing in front of his lab, not exactly the most subtle but it's a point worth emphasising these days.

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

"Sure, it’s weird to see copyright infringement be the hill upon which she’ll kill"

It makes perfect sense given her pro-capitalist views. The evil scorpions who steal inventions and ideas are Bad Capitalists, robbing people of the money they could (and should) be making. It is because of the Bad Capitalists like the scorpions or Edison that the Good Capitalists like Tesla can't become billionaires like they deserve. To this Doctor, to take away someone's capacity to make money is a, appropriately named, capital offense that deserves a capital punishment.

Link | Reply

Matthew Marcus 5 months, 2 weeks ago

This may not be a popular view around here but I actually much prefer Chibnall's seeming attitude to historical episodes to either Moffat's or RTD's. RTD fawned over historical "celebs" but tended to see history as a Very Silly Place, ripe for clowning around in and mostly backdropping the seasons quota of "silly romps". And Moffat's sitcom instincts didn't really change this. Whether or not Chibnall is up to making great stories *full stop*, I really do appreciate that his historicals are being taken more seriously as a rule than any since the 1960s. (Whether or not this is just because they look good lined up with Chibnall's sci-fi adventures is of course another question.)

Link | Reply

Bedlinog 5 months, 2 weeks ago

That's not quite a correct view of what the RTD era was doing. In all his celebrity historicals, the celebrities were writers. In essence, the Doctor was entering a fun version of an Agatha Christie story or a Dickens novel. It was never an attempt to set the story in the past. It was more overtly to see what happened if Dr. Who was crossed with a famous literary genre.

Moffatt used 'historical celebrities' almost like guest stars. So, instead of, say a famous film star turning up in a story, you'd have Queen Elizabeth I, or Churchill turning up in a story that had very little to do with portraying a historical era.

If Chibnall has anything like an approach, it's to try and have Dr. Who do 'Goodnight Stories for Rebel Girls/Boys', in which we introduce a historical figure (e.g. Rosa Parks or Ada Lovelace) in order to give a short introduction to them to the kids at home. I'm not sure this is actually a workable idea in story terms, as it means that the historical figure can't function within the Dr. Who story at all (Rosa Parks had no idea she was in a Dr. Who adventure, and Ada Lovelace got her brain wiped so she'd have no memory of it). The Tesla story (not by Chibnall) was more like a half-remembered RTD approach, which didn't quite realise that RTD's celebrity historicals weren't about portraying history.

Link | Reply

Prole Hole 5 months, 2 weeks ago

"In all his celebrity historicals, the celebrities were writers."

Just to be technically correct (the best kind of correct!) Mme de Pompadour wasn't a writer and "The Girl In The Fireplace" is probably the most celebrated celebrity historical in the whole of the RTD era. I mean sure, it's written by Moffat, but it's squarely in the RTD era - not even halfway through in fact - and I'd argue it was absolutely an attempt at setting a story in the past. Indeed the emotional crux of the story rests on the idea that the Doctor might be stranded in the past, taking the "slower path".

(I'd also strongly contest the idea of "The Unicorn And The Wasp" as fun, since it's straight-up awful, but that's a separate matter)

Link | Reply

Przemek 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I love "The Unicorn and the Wasp". I could rewatch it endlessly.

Link | Reply

Prole Hole 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I think that's probably the general opinion but it's not one I share, despite my absolute unending love for Catherine Tate and Donna. Horses for courses and all that - it may well be me that's in the wrong.

Link | Reply

TheHabbadasher 5 months, 2 weeks ago

I think it's fair to say that, so far, the historicals have been a bit of a strength of the Chibnall era. At the very least, none of them have been anywhere near outright bad.

Link | Reply

Matt Walker 5 months, 2 weeks ago

As ever, the insightful observations have been captured in the comments (and, of course, the post proper).

For me, the raised bar (how laughable) is marked by the fact I was actually able to watch the entire episode for the first time this season. *sigh*

As much as I wanted to believe otherwise, I fear Jodie W was dreadfully mis-cast.

If we have to put up with Chibnall, could we please lose at least one of the companions; they handled three companions better c.1981?!

Link | Reply

New Comment

required

required (not published)

optional

Recent Posts

Archive

Tags

Authors

Feeds

RSS / Atom