Viewing posts tagged oh god I'm so bored
5 years, 4 months ago
I've been playing catch-up on SF/Fantasy films/TV that passed me by. (Here be spoilers
Did you ever see a movie so bad you genuinely start to think you licked a toad at some point? If not, look no further. Not quite as offensive as the book, but only because it seems to have been drained of any ideas at all... in the same way that you drain butchered farm animals of their blood. Which is a fate you start to long for after more than half an hour of looking at Asa Butterfield's sullen, gormless face. Harrison Ford makes it worth watching for his open, blatant boredom. One empathises.Pacific Rim
The level of disregard shown for plot logic - even their own heavily-established plot points - is so brazen as to be almost admirable. Beautifully made. But making this
story beautifully is a bit like taking ages to weave a tapestry for your grandma out of the finest silks with a message on the front that gets her name wrong. The little girl who plays young-Mako is a better actor than most of the main adult ...
6 years ago
Here are a few of the fortunes I devised during my first week as a writer of fortunes at Trang's Fortune Cookies Ltd:
YOU ARE CURRENTLY BALD. THIS IS A MISTAKE.
OBEY THE WISDOM OF THE FROG. HE KNOWS.
LOOK NOT TO THE RIGHT NOR TO THE LEFT BUT SIMPLY DO.
KEEP IT SIMPLE. COMPLEXITY KILLS.
HAPPY THE MAN WHO KNOWS NOTHING OF CHEESE.
STARSKY AND HUTCH, I SUMMON YOU.
I LOVE YOUR EARS, MY LITTLE FRIEND.
Mr Trang speaks no English, but he pops his head round my office door every day and expresses his benevolent interest in my work by means of gestures and facial expressions. I show him my work book. I concoct something in the region of 500 fortunes a day. More, on a good day. Mr Trang cannot read them but he casts his eyes over my work politely. He smiles and nods encouragingly. Sometimes he bows and mimes applause. I smile back, bow in return and mime modest shrugs. This appears to please him and he leaves.
I came to work at Trang's after losing my job at the Ministry ...
6 years, 4 months ago
"The tygers of wrath are wiser than the horses of instruction" said William Blake in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell
, and on lots of European walls in the 60s, and under the cover of an Eighth Doctor Adventure by Kate Orman.
I disagree. I think you need the horses of instruction just as much as you need the tygers of wrath. The thing about the tygers is that they chase you. The thing about the horses is that you have to chase them. If you've got a horse ahead of you and a tyger behind... well, that's not comfortable, but it's the better way round. It gives you both a strong impetus and a goal.
Of course, horses can be wild and tygers can be calm.
I'll stop there. All analogies can be pushed to breaking point. Even the ones invented by geniuses.
6 years, 7 months ago
Kant's categorical imperative is an expression of the bourgeois liberal ideas of the 18th century, expressed as morality. It is progressive in the sense that it attempts to derive morality from Reason. It is part of the Enlightenment. It also expresses the new, universal promises of the bourgeois revolutions in that it universalises (i.e. "All men are created equal"). It is based on the principle of universality. What you do must apply to all people or it fails to be truly moral.
However, it is also based on a bourgeois notion of rights. The concept of 'rights' is a product of the rise of bourgeois property/trade relations. One brings one's rights to the market place and, on that basis, one participates in the putatively level playing field. For Kant, one negotiates the conflicts between these rights on the basis of contractual clauses. If the Party of the First Part undertakes to do such and such, the Party of the Second part will be understood to be obliged to do so and so. It is this which finally inverts the universality of the notion into an ...
7 years, 3 months ago
"Hurr hurr... You think this is the real Quaid?"Well it might be,
thought the guard. Then again it might not. It might be Quaid using his hologram thingy... or it might actually be Quaid pretending to be a hologram in order to trick us. I have no way of knowing, really... unless I wait to see if it flickers in that way that really makes the hologram projector next-to useless as a weapon. But that would take time. Time in which I might get shot if it turns out not to be a hologram. So I think I'll shoot it anyway. Just in case. After all, better safe than sorry.
Luckily for the guard, this train of thought only took him a split second. What with him having been highly trained and everything.
7 years, 3 months ago
7 years, 7 months ago
Rewatching Star Wars
is an odd experience.
It's surprisingly dirty, grimey and grotty.
It doesn't introduce the hero until about 15 minutes in.
Loads of the first reel is one-sided bickering, followed by silent wandering around in the desert.
Han is really very seedy... and a murderer.
Leia is a sarcastic, bossy, combative dominatrix; a far cry from the sexual-harassment-victim / soppy-girlfriend she later became.
The tone suddenly veers from deadly serious to comic/quippy as soon as the Falcon arrives at the Death Star.
The Stormtroopers hang around and chat.
The Rebels are an unprepossessing bunch - skinny, scrawny, tubby, greasy-haired, snaggletoothed, etc.
The droids are CLEARLY slaves to the humans.
The Sandpeople are CLEARLY evil Arabs.
The backstory as explained by Ben is much better than anything in the sequels, let alone the prequels: Ben and Annakin go and become Jedis, their protege Darth kills Annakin, Ben buggers off home. Clear, simple and emotionally resonant.
Darth is clearly a first name and is clearly NOT Luke's dad, no more than Leia is Luke's sister. Luke and Leia clearly fancy each other.The funny thing is that, if we take the prequel canon as applying to ...
8 years, 11 months ago
Remember how the accuracy-nazis used to insist upon referring to 'An Unearthly Child' as '100,000 BC' (and 'The Daleks' as 'The Mutants' and 'Galaxy 4' as 'Enid Harper Collects Her Son Ian From His Karate Lessons') and so on? Despite the fact that doing so was really, really embarassing?
Actually, I think DWM
still do that. Not sure. Ages since I read it. (Which is a lie because I read the copy with my name in from cover to cover.)
Anyway, remember that whole original titles thing?
Well, the original title of this
venture that you're currently reading, when it was still just a glint in my bloodshot eye and long before I came up with 'Shabogan Graffiti', was... *drum roll puh-leeze* 'Carmine Seepage'.
I mention this because:
a) you didn't look bored enough, and
b) it is the context behind my new banner/logo thing (see above).
Originally, the banner/logo thing for 'Carmine Seepage' was going to be melty red lipstick-writing on 80s-style TARDIS walls. (My demographic don't need this reference explained.) But then I came up with the graffiti theme. And my old website wouldn't ...