Read the comments; they can't be crazier than we are
This week I'm joined by James Murphy of Pex Lives to discuss Under the Lake and, in typical Eruditorum Press style, a myriad of other topics, some of which actually have an obvious relationship to Under the Lake. Perversely, we manage to go on half an hour longer than Jane and I did about an actually good story. I have no explanation. You can get it here, in any case.
Comments
dm 4 years, 8 months ago
Am I the only (mostly reformed) Moffatt-h8r who believes his far more unhinged writing as showrunner is infinitely more interesting than his RTD era "masterpiece" Blink?
Link | Replydm 4 years, 8 months ago
Also, in the rating system, 4 is going to be a very fractured one, maybe a 4-4.5 scale there?
Link | ReplyElizabeth Sandifer 4 years, 8 months ago
Ha. I should have said this one was a four, but I wasn't sure if it was Hinchcliffe or Williams.
Link | Replydm 4 years, 8 months ago
Between those two eras, I can think of very few stories that approach the level of utter dullness we get here.
Link | ReplyI LOVE a leisurely pace, I love watching characters interact gently, I love a slowly unfolding plot. But this thing actually felt like it was happening in slow motion. This Capaldi PArt 1 was more tedious than a Hartnell Part 3
irwinmenson 3 years, 3 months ago
Under the Lake is about the system that can break down all the shattered dreams of people. More reviews on the film can be found here, on the web writemyessay today.
Link | ReplyComment deleted 3 years ago
Comment deleted 1 year, 3 months ago
New Comment