Viewing posts tagged vaka rangi
4 years, 1 month ago
Normal shabcast service has been resumed after the unplanned emergency anti-fascist edition from earlier this month (though you may be hearing more from Phil and myself on the issue of the Hugos and the nazis). This episode of the Shabogan Graffiti podcast is the long-awaited continuation of my mammoth chat with the lovely Josh Marsfelder, writer of the ridiculously good Vaka Rangi blog. A slightly disjointed episode this one, but you're getting all the good bits. The bits I chopped out are mostly me being inconsequential. What's left is mostly Josh being eloquent and passionate about TNG, Trek generally, Dirty Pair, aesthetics, fan fiction, slash, Mary Sues, singularity archetypes, and all sorts and manners and conditions of interesting stuff. We also do a bit of violently malevolent hating on Wesley Crusher... which should be entirely acceptable to all right-thinking people. You'll love it, trust me. Hardcore nattering, with no fascism to ruin everything. Paint a bulls-eye on your heart right now.ADDITIONAL: Umm, I've actually added the link to the new episode now. *Also, here are links to all my previous audio stuff:Shabcast 3 (the emergency anti-fascist ...
5 years, 4 months ago
The Pex Lives boys have done a supplemental podcast
about the Star Trek
movies. Got me thinking about why I like Star Trek IV
so much. I decided to try writing something about it, since anything that even vaguely twitches my interest is worth grabbing hold of at the moment, what with my blogging mojo being critically ill and lying, sobbing and wailing, in a deep dark pit.
I don't like the movie because it's 'tongue-in-cheek' or because I have any sort of ideological attachment to the idea that SF in general (or Trek
in particular) should be 'self-aware' or anything like that. I like it because it is, essentially, a movie about a bunch of old relics from the 60s wandering around Regan's America and disapproving of it heartily.
This is not a deep movie. It isn't hard to parse. No great leaps of interpretation are needed. Just look at what happens.
In order to survive in 80s San Franciso, Kirk must sell his beloved spectacles, a gift from Bones. He, a man who - as we learn from this film - comes from a culture without money, must commodify ...
6 years ago
I've never been a Trekkie, but I've seen enough of the franchise over the years to make me think I could talk about it with some familiarity, hence this
post from a while ago. It started out as an outgrowth of something about the Cybermen and the Borg that I'm still tinkering with. I stand by a lot of what I wrote, but I'm preparing to have to revise some of my views because of the arrival of a truly excellent new blog called Vaka Rangi
, written by my online friend (and frequent Shabgraff commenter) Josh Marsfelder. He describes the blog as
an attempt at a critical history of utopian futurism in televised science fiction, particularly science fiction involving voyaging starships, from a specific perspective and using the Star Trek franchise as a "guiding text"
I'm posting this not simply to get you to check out this blog (which you should utterly do, if the subject interests you) but also to address a remark I made in my own essay on Trek. This remark:
it's astounding that apparently intelligent people can tout Star Trek as a great example of progressivism ...