Once More With Feeling?

(5 comments)

It is incredibly depressing to realise that I have been asking the rulers of the state I live in to refrain from bombing Iraq for my entire fucking life.

There's an extent to which the 'it won't work' critique is entirely valid as an objection to waging yet more war upon the Middle East.  Because the surface aim of the politicians is almost certainly to impose 'stability' on 'the region'.  They like stability.  No threats to embarass them, no revolts to topple their friendly dictators, no threat to Israel, no danger to neoliberal exploitation of local resources and markets, etc.  And, as has been shown, it doesn't work.  They try and try to bomb the Middle East into passive compliance, and all they succeed in doing is generating more troubles for their empire.

This is, of course, what empires have always done.  Create the problems of tomorrow by viciously conquering the problems of today.

But there's another sense in which the 'it won't work' argument is fatally flawed, because there's a sense in which it does work.  It may never achieve 'stability' but it does keep the machinery of empire chugging, and the fuel of empire flowing.  Because the fuel of empire is as much war itself as the resources extracted via war.  The neverending war keeps the military-industrial complex in work, the contracts coming, the factories producing, etc.  It keeps the corporate media busy and happy, reporting yet more incomprehensible strife from 'over there' and 'our' attempts to make things better.  It keeps the endless circular debate about intervention circling (the system can tolerate a tortuous and muddled debate, what it doesn't want is clarity).  It keeps the public money flowing into the vast state run apparatus of military spending, and into all the R&D that is done under the aegis of this and then handed over (free) to private enterprise.  It keeps the empire's power and prestige in the ascendant, with the machinery of death inspiring the fear - and projecting the apparent invincibility - that every empire needs.

No, the war never 'works' in the sense of achieving a stable imperium, but it does 'work' - at least in the short term - in achieving a powerful empire.  One of the paradoxes of empire is that its power relies upon it never being stable.  So even when the bombing doesn't work, it actually does.

Meanwhile, of course, people die.  And die and die and die.

Comments

Cousin Magog 2 years, 6 months ago

He does pretty well with corps from hell
But lately we can tell
That he's just going through the motions
Faking it somehow
It's not even half the blog it-- ow...

JK XD

Link | Reply

Philip Sandifer 2 years, 6 months ago

I admit, this is one of the situations where I tend to be reduced to grumbling in a corner without really having anything to say, my distaste for imperialist warfare running painfully into my inability to identify a better solution to the immediate problem.

Link | Reply

Anonymous 2 years, 5 months ago

What problem can't be ameliorated by killing children? I know it makes me feel better. (Wm Keith)

Link | Reply

gatchamandave 2 years, 5 months ago

That they are now bombing the people that 12 months ago they were telling us they wanted to support just underlines that what they all along wanted was to "do something".

Link | Reply

Jacob Nanfito 2 years, 5 months ago

It's heart breaking.

Link | Reply

New Comment

required

required (not published)

optional

Recent Posts

Archive

Tags

Authors

Feeds

RSS / Atom