Posted by:
Jack Graham
2 years, 1 month ago
(6 comments)
This is, of course, another episode that all the usual Moffatistas praise to the skies. Well, that's fair enough. All the Moffaty things they love are here. Again. And what on earth could possibly be wrong with wanting to watch exactly the same things over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again? I mean, Moffat makes lots of money writing the same things over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, so obviously repetition is good, right? Stands to reason.
Also, such is the religious devotion that certain people have to this man that nothing thrills them more than yet another episode where Moffat sticks his hand up
Doctor Who's arse and rearranges its guts to his liking... or (perhaps a better metaphor) meticulously works his way through a library of classics, scribbling 'Steven Moffat is cleverer than the person who wrote this' over every page. And he is, obviously, because he gets big viewing figures and makes lots of money from being a Whovian capitalist. The definition of artistic success, clearly.
Share on Facebook
Comments
Ross 2 years, 1 month ago
I am very close to calling shennanigans on this whole "without having watched them" thing, since it's stretching credulity to suggest that you could have made such an accurate analysis of the episode without having seen it.
Link | ReplyJack Graham 2 years, 1 month ago
You're not taking into account how predictable Moffat is.
Link | ReplyTheonlyspiral 2 years, 1 month ago
Do you have a generator that just spits these out? This is the most Jack Graham post on Doctor Who under Moffat that one could conceptualize. It's a piece of art.
Link | ReplyI mean, it's completely wrong. But all the same.
Jack Graham 2 years, 1 month ago
Of course it's wrong: I HAVEN'T WATCHED THE EPISODE. Hello?
Link | ReplyAnonymous 2 years, 1 month ago
Where in the world have you picked up the impression thaat Moffat ever writes anything with the thought 'Steven Moffat is cleverer than the person who wrote this'?
Link | ReplyChristopher Kelley 2 years ago
Oddly enough you're not that far off.
Link | ReplyNew Comment