Our business actually is to reason and compare

Skip to content

Elizabeth Sandifer

Elizabeth Sandifer created Eruditorum Press. She’s not really sure why she did that, and she apologizes for the inconvenience. She currently writes Last War in Albion, a history of the magical war between Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. She used to write TARDIS Eruditorum, a history of Britain told through the lens of a ropey sci-fi series. She also wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk, writes comics these days, and has ADHD so will probably just randomly write some other shit sooner or later. Support Elizabeth on Patreon.

24 Comments

  1. Paul Fisher Cockburn
    September 2, 2024 @ 6:23 am

    A wonderfully concise overview of “the Cook Era”, thank you, which I guess must be one of the few in the programme’s history to so thorougly overlap – and indeed overshadow – what was supposedly the current “era” on television. (Probably the closest I can recall was my anticipation about Series 5 which, during 2009, made me somewhat impatient for David Tennant (et all) to vacate the premises.

    I can’t say I actually took part in any of the Tweetalongs beyond “The Day of The Doctor” (I’d long fallen out of love with Twitter even by that point, and was slowly but surely getting ready to leave it behind) but I nevertheless kept on top of the videos, short stories, etc, and I certainly found it an interesting opportunity to look back on both the Moffat and Davies eras. At the time, I just assumed the relative lack of Chibnall episodes was down to them being (a) “disappointing” (ahem!), and (b) too soon to have developed any sense of nostalgia—and, as you mention, Chibnall did contribute a few things to the whole process, including an officially-sanctioned (sort of) “guide to lockdown”. Which, you know, probably did help some kids deal with things, so a bit of a win.

    But I think your main point is spot-on. The future of Doctor Who from 2023 onwards wasn’t born in the Chibnall era; it was birthed in Cook’s. Which rather goes to prove that, once and for all, 21st century Doctor Who is amongst the best (as well as the worst) fan fiction out there!

    Reply

    • Cyrano
      September 2, 2024 @ 6:54 am

      It’s almost like a speedrun version of the Wilderness Years, taking place while the show was still actually on TV.

      Multimedia flowering of different kinds of Doctor Who experiment, reappraisal of old fan wisdoms (to an extent. I’d call the wholehearted embrace of RTD and Moffat nostalgia a reappraisal considering the loud bitter voices about them in fan circles by the end of their tenures), upheaval of fan/creative communication and access, and then the future is born as the limitations of the period hit.

      I really like the labelling of it as the Cook era. And, interestingly given the discussion in the previous episode comments, it is an era driven by a producer figure rather than a writer figure!

      And of course, given the overall project of Eruditorum positioning Doctor Who as a path through history, it had to intersect with Covid at some point. I’m glad the Cook era makes that interaction so fruitful and interesting rather than a dry account of production delays and adjustments.

      Reply

  2. David Pattie
    September 2, 2024 @ 7:42 am

    Thanks- I honestly hadn’t thought of the watchalongs in this way, but you make a really persuasive argument. It’s also good to be reminded of something that was a small bright light in the middle of Covid, at a point when Twitter was still (just) a site that made this kind of communal interaction possible.

    Reply

  3. Jesse
    September 2, 2024 @ 12:27 pm

    I don’t think I knew about any of these lockdown-era minisodes until I read this entry, which I mention only because it illustrates just how much I (and I’m guessing many others too) checked out of Doctor Who after The Timeless Children aired. I suppose that story was the moment I stopped giving Chibnall even the most threadbare benefit of the doubt.

    Reply

  4. John G Wood
    September 2, 2024 @ 1:23 pm

    I’ve never been on Twitter so didn’t take part, but I watched/read the supporting material as it became available. I found it rather sad that Paul Cornell produced dialogue for Whittaker’s Doctor that was better than anything anyone had written for Jodie to perform. I read it out loud to the family, and it was so easy to find the cadence, plus it actually said something, and retroactively improved HN/FoB.

    Reply

  5. Hugh
    September 2, 2024 @ 7:38 pm

    I just read “The Simple Things” and uh, yeah, that’s exactly what does happen. Sheesh.

    Definitely wasn’t expecting “rich economies sourcing their weapons from poor economies is a positive-sum economic exchange, no other moral viewpoint on this is possible” in a light-hearted short story about Graham’s love of West Ham. It’s absolutely wild that the Doctor completely drops any objections because apparently this is just the way the world works, plus “the boss cared about his workers”, and the only counterpoint she offers is to suggest the Draconian manager get into football instead of war – a variation on the “not killing witches will make you happier” line of self-help reasoning she tried on King James.

    It’s not like Chibnall made Wilkinson write this. This is presumably a bit of fluff he probably didn’t even see before publication. So what the fuck is in the water in Cardiff that this sort of stuff kept on happening in the Chibnall era? Between “a refugee from the planet Skaro”, the ending of Kerblam!, “he should have been the first billionaire”, the life of Percy Shelley being more important than some servants, and this, genuinely the fuck was going on?

    Reply

    • Einarr
      September 3, 2024 @ 8:03 am

      As El says, there’s the possibility that “Wilkinson was attempting a Warmongeresque bit of satire”, the likelihood of which I would say is slightly boosted by a) what I have heard about her dissatisfaction re: the writing experience on S11 and b) the various moments in the Witchfinders novelisation which feel like throwing shade on the era’s morals or lampshading this incarnation’s shallowness.

      Reply

  6. Kate Orman
    September 2, 2024 @ 9:34 pm

    This was fascinating. One of those unstable moments in time?

    Reply

  7. Przemek
    September 3, 2024 @ 4:26 am

    I wasn’t aware this was a thing. Lovely! Thanks for shining some light on such a fascinating moment in DW history.

    Reply

  8. Richard Lyth
    September 3, 2024 @ 4:36 am

    There was also the excellent “Farewell, Sarah Jane” around the same time, which was both an epilogue to The Sarah Jane Adventures and a touching tribute to Elisabeth Sladen. Probably the best of the lot.

    Reply

  9. Tollers
    September 3, 2024 @ 5:12 am

    Has anyone collected the tweetalong threads posted by Moffat and the other contributors?

    Reply

  10. T
    September 3, 2024 @ 6:30 am

    My favourite moments of the Lockdown/Cook era were “The Secret of Novice Hame”, “Farewell Sarah Jane” (interesting, given that I believe RTD once said he wouldn’t kill off Sarah Jane in-canon), “Doctor Who and the Time War” and the insights provided by RTD and Moffat via Twitter.

    Also interesting was how RTD wrote that “all stories are real – every story happened” in response to “Doctor Who and the Time War.” Flash forward a couple of years and we have a Tennant minisode in which the Doctor says, “The timelines in the canon are rupturing!” Then we are introduced to the concept of bi-generation and, via commentary, RTD’s headcanon of “what if every Doctor bi-generated, and there are endless alternative timelines out there”, plus the Memory TARDIS. The seeds of RTD2 right there in Lockdown, as he breaks open the Whoniverse’s first seed.

    Reply

  11. prandeamus
    September 3, 2024 @ 2:10 pm

    Memories of this period are weird and confusing for me. I was able to work from home without too much impact, but my kids were going to school “remotely” and my spouse was trying to manage her classroom from an impromptu office in the bedroom. Cut off from family and friends, yet we were able to get workmen in to install new high speed internet and deliver a garden shed so long as we kept distance. No particular logic to what was allowed or not. I saw my mother for the last time in a year+ thinking it could easily be the last meeting (it wasn’t) while wandering around supermarkets temporarily empty of pasta. Panic buying of toilet rolls.

    Media made valiant attempts to keep going – panel shows were recorded first with very limited audiences, then no audiences at all. At one point “Have I Got News For You” was basically a zoom call. Radio shows recorded from home. I attended theatre script readings using around a virtual table.

    Even in those first days, there was a sense of the “Before Time” and “After Time”. Looking back at shows recorded in 2019 or earlier made me think that, Torchwood-style, that this was the time that everything changed. We’ve been through a million strange events since that time, only half a decade ago yet slowly congealing into myth as we watch. I managed, rather like those people in 1946 who would say they had a “good war”. Many did not.

    In a world where the word “unprecedented” nearly died of overuse, I will defend the Jodie Sontaran thing. I can’t particularly do so on aesthetic grounds, and I am no fan of Chibnall’s writing. But it did try to offer a little hope and empathy to kids. Is it the only case where Thirteen properly breaks the fourth wall?

    Thank you for reading this incoherence.

    Reply

    • prandeamus
      September 6, 2024 @ 10:15 am

      In an act or irony or karma whatever, I post this message and within 24 hours come down with Covid symptoms. Yuck. I don’t need to be reminded.

      Reply

  12. SeeingI
    September 3, 2024 @ 2:20 pm

    My main memory of this era is that RTD hosted a Twitter non-competition inviting people to essay Davros’ wonderfully bonkers line “Activate the Reality Bomb!” He posted nice replies to almost all of them (gent that he is) and I posted my unhinged take on it, he replied “Oh, I think you win!” What unalloyed joy!

    If Bleach is ever unavailable, they know where to find me – legs and all!

    (By the way, thanks to Kate Orman for my long-used screen name!)

    Reply

  13. Alex B
    September 4, 2024 @ 12:37 pm

    At the risk of trivialising the biggest collective trauma of any of our lifetimes… was the pandemic actually a net good for Doctor Who, do we think?

    With how the show was trending beforehand, I’m not certain we’d be stood here in 2024 with a version of the show in active production (pending Disney putting any more money in, of course). Without the pandemic, there’s no Davies return, no Whoniverse, no anniversary specials, no Gatwa as the Doctor, no Tales from the TARDIS, no War Between, no Prom… were it not for the Cook era, the present of the show would look vastly different, and I’d probably argue worse (best case scenario, we’d be neck-deep in the McTighe era, and worst case we’d be in the midst of nothing at all).

    Reply

    • T
      September 4, 2024 @ 1:02 pm

      Ironically, I’m one of the people who thinks the brand as a whole could benefit from having a few years off air, to reset, for the BBC to actively find new talent, people with a new vision, and for people to miss it for a while. shrug

      Reply

      • James Whitaker
        September 4, 2024 @ 1:55 pm

        It feels like the show’s in a weird position now whereby if Davies were to die tomorrow the whole thing would be completely dead in the water. Doesn’t feel like the programme’s in an entirely good position if we’re relying on one extremely talented guy to run it indefinitely.

        Reply

        • T
          September 4, 2024 @ 2:49 pm

          I agree. I wonder if RTD might remain as an exec with Bad Wolf and oversee future eras? Whatever we think about his creative work and scripts, he’s at least very good at holding the fort together, the nuts and bolts of production – his eras certainly seem steadier than chunks of Moffat and Chibnall’s did at times. But then if he does stay, in any capacity, does his shadow just loom over the show indefinitely? Is Doctor Who, essentially, stuck?

          Reply

          • James Whitaker
            September 4, 2024 @ 3:34 pm

            The shifting nature of the tv landscape means that nothing gets made that isn’t an auteurist project made by an industry veteran – Doctor Who’s been lucky in that they’ve had two of those to steady the ship both with the clout and the talent, Moffat and Davies. I can’t honestly see the show getting made without either one or both being involved in some capacity. But yeah, the fact that we haven’t really moved onto the show being put in the hands of people born in the 80’s and 90’s is an issue.

  14. Allyn
    September 4, 2024 @ 3:55 pm

    The Adventures in Lockdown book was the closest I’ve come since elementary school to recapturing the Scholastic Book Fair.

    Getting it in the US was a little difficult, as there weren’t worldwide rights in the book due to the money going to charity. Someone who worked on the book contacted me privately and asked how I even got one.

    When it arrived and I ripped the package open, I was hit with a strong smell that was just like a Scholastic Book Fair book, and the texture of the pages felt the same. I felt like I was nine again.

    Reply

  15. prandeamus
    September 6, 2024 @ 10:21 am

    Maybe a bit late, but even though twitter continues a downward spiral into cesspittery, it’s still capable of little gems. User “Jeje” (@ daemonsmatt) is already a bit Matt Smith fan, I presume based on HotD or something, and decided to jump into the 11th doctor era with no background info starting at the Eleventh Hour, bingewatching as she goes. There’s a vicarious joy to be found watching someone see the show through fresh eyes.

    Reply

  16. Moon J. Cobwebb
    September 9, 2024 @ 9:40 am

    Not only am I going to defend the position that Wilkinson is playing at puckish caprice with her satire on Chibnallian ethics (which imho is what the era most deserves and benefits from; art that takes seriously the challenge of its characters as presented, rather than prettification), but I’ll go one further into the field of controversy and suggest that, to me at least, Cornell’s duology, first in which Benny outlines all the very good reasons to regard Sister-of-Mine as functionally irredeemable and untrustworthy, and second in which Thirteen blithely frees her anyway despite her evident lack of penitence, is… while probably not as completely deconstructionist at least expressing and exploring some ambivalences wrt Jodie’s Doctor as a new kind of ‘good monster’ to what came before.

    Reply

  17. Christopher Brown
    September 9, 2024 @ 6:45 pm

    I meant to comment this last week, but my favorite piece has long been RTD’s Sarah Jane one. After all, SJA ended with an announcement that the show would go on forever, essentially immortalizing the character despite Lis Sladen’s passing. And yet here, during the pandemic, the “shows” slow down and takes the time to reflect on what it has left behind, to give its characters time to reflect on those no longer with us. I don’t know what that means in the arc of Davies’s approach to these topics, but more than any other Lockdown piece, this feels like the one that engages directly with the grim paratext of lockdown, and finds the beautiful humanity among it – which has always been part and parcel of his writing.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.