Gaze not into the abyss lest you accidentally write a book

Skip to content

Elizabeth Sandifer

Elizabeth Sandifer created Eruditorum Press. She’s not really sure why she did that, and she apologizes for the inconvenience. She currently writes Last War in Albion, a history of the magical war between Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. She used to write TARDIS Eruditorum, a history of Britain told through the lens of a ropey sci-fi series. She also wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk, writes comics these days, and has ADHD so will probably just randomly write some other shit sooner or later. Support Elizabeth on Patreon.

43 Comments

  1. Pol
    November 4, 2024 @ 5:45 am

    And then, even after all of that, this is guaranteed to be someone’s favourite episode of Doctor Who.

    One to go.

    Reply

  2. Einarr
    November 4, 2024 @ 6:59 am

    At least its potentially iffy and insensitive content was defended loudly on his social media by Mick Lewis, who played one of the Sea Devil extras and was very quick to shout down any accusations of there ever having been anything tone-deaf in this production.

    That’d be the same Mick Lewis who wrote “Combat Rock” and “Rags” for BBC Books, two of the wildest swings the PDAs ever made, in which there’s lots of savage Indonesian cannibals, penis gourds aplenty, copious repetition of “whore”, etc; and the man whose big idea in 2002 or so for bringing the character of the Doctor back was (and I quote) “as a whorin’, drinkin’ b*****d. One of the Wild Bunch with a sort of conscience, but you’re never too sure. That or bring her back as a prostitute. Doctor Whore? …am I being glib?”

    You get the defenders you deserve!

    Reply

    • prandeamus
      November 4, 2024 @ 7:31 am

      The PDAs did not always succeed with the 3rd Doctor.

      “Devil Goblins from Neptune”. I dunno. They came from beyond Neptune and they were Devil Goblins or something.
      “Last of the Gadarene” Gatiss runs a Letts emulator – I don’t see the point of utter traditionalism.
      “Katastrophea” – Dicks running a Dicks emulator. Felt like discarded script from 1972.
      “Verdigris” works if Iris Wildthyme is your character of choice, I suppose. But I left my copy in a motel room and didn’t bother to go back for it.

      But “Rags” … I can’t remember much except thinking it was Ugly. I suppose I should credit the author for trying something different with the character and companions, but it was just Ugly.

      Reply

      • Christopher Brown
        November 4, 2024 @ 1:53 pm

        I’ll go to bat for Verdigris as a masterpiece. Never bothered with the others, and there’s no way any book could live up to “Devil Goblins from Neptune” as a title, anyway.

        Reply

    • Hugh
      November 4, 2024 @ 4:40 pm

      I mean, in his defence the savage cannibals are the good guys in Combat Rock. The totally-not-the-Indonesian colonial government is worse!

      Reply

  3. prandeamus
    November 4, 2024 @ 7:22 am

    Bringing back Ogrons: I see the issues here. They’ve always been hench-beings, never protagonists or antagonists in their own right. Larry Miles had a go at rehabilitating Ogrons in Interference: Book One with a supporting character who helps Sarah Jane and K-9 at one point. As always with Miles, an interesting read with lots of intriguing ideas that, alas, would not automatically transfer to a TV episode.

    Reply

    • Ross
      November 4, 2024 @ 8:41 am

      I think it would be reasonable and in-keeping with other stuff to bring the Ogrons back as “Badass Space-Mercenaries”, and reinterpret their low intelligence as rather being about toxic machismo, in the vein of Warhammer Orcs (Having said it out loud, omg, I’m falling in love with the idea of using Orgons as a proxy for Toxic Manosphere Figures who speak in broken english because pronouns are too woke, who the doctor defeats because actually spending effort to fight a WOMAN would be GAY), but perhaps this would be a little too easy). Use them in place of the Mire or swap them in place of the Judoon in “Fugitive of the Etc” in order to keep the Judoon as actual space-cops.

      I dunno if it would be better than just forgetting about the Ogrons, but it wouldn’t be a Per-Se disaster like the Sea Devils.

      The Ogrons were always a weird misdirect because it seemed like their purpose was to have someone to fight in episode 1 because it was contractually forbidden for the Daleks to show up until the cliffhanger. You were supposed to see them and think “Oh, it’s the generic mercenary mooks; I wonder who they are working for this time?” which is a strange expectation given that (a) despite the Doctor saying that they were generic space mercenaries who worked for whoever would pay them, they only ever worked for the Daleks and (b) “of the Daleks” was right there in the title.

      Reply

      • mano
        November 5, 2024 @ 3:18 am

        Hmm, I had been thinking about a story redeeming the Ogrons as people from an impoverished group who became mercenaries just to survive, with their seeming low intelligence being the result of not being able to produce the sounds for human languages very well or something like that. Not sure that would have worked, sure would have been a disaster if I had tried to write it…

        Anyway I now prefer your idea of Manosphere Ogrons!

        Reply

        • prandeamus
          November 5, 2024 @ 6:13 am

          “seeming low intelligence being the result of not being able to produce the sounds for human languages” is partly how Miles writes Lost Boy (?) in Interference. I like the mercenary angle, too.

          Reply

  4. Cyrano
    November 4, 2024 @ 7:55 am

    Maybe interesting to compare and contrast with Planet of the Dead: both thematically slight and light on ongoing character and plot arcs, intended to give the characters a fun time before the end. Both, indeed, hampered by behind the scenes trouble, though Planet of the Dead in the end could successfully incorporate its damaged bus into the action whereas the handling of whatever the hell happened here causes the episode to simply stop being coherent.

    Planet of the Dead gets away with it (though not by much: I believe it was widely received as disappointing at the time, which must be right because that’s how I felt) because the era carries a lot of goodwill, because David Tennant had been a front and centre Doctor such that you sensibly can pitch This Doctor Just Has a Fun Adventure as an attraction shortly before he explodes forever, because the behind the scenes operation is well oiled enough that it can just make this work even though the key prop is smashed in halfway through filming.

    Conversely, Legend of the Sea Devils comes from a series that’s been leaking goodwill with a lot of the audience (at least the audience that are here for this comparison) and that, crucially, has never really asked us to believe in the charisma of Jodie Whittaker’s Doctor. That’s not to say she’s not likeable, that she’s not fun to watch, but the show has never noticed or believed in that in the same way it clearly saw David Tennant through the eye of the camera and thought “what a guy!”. So to ask us to enjoy her and her friends swashbuckling around without any meaningful foundation is a weird stretch for the penultimate episode. She’s always been written lower in the mix, stumbling into things, equivocal, not necessarily able or even willing to topple empires and save the day. To pitch a ‘romp’ for this cast is to fundamentally understand the show you’ve been making for four years.

    And of course, it’s a production that is not competently run enough to salvage something from whatever backstage blow this was dealt.

    Reply

  5. Ross
    November 4, 2024 @ 8:16 am

    There are a handful of stories which I just can not hold onto in my mind. I know they happened, I know I watched them, but no matter how many times I experience them, they just won’t stick in my mind. Like “The Awakening”.

    Last Thursday, my son abruptly transitioned from being a not-we to being a dedicated Doctor Who fan. I am pleased with this development though I’d prefer if it hadn’t manifested as him downloading the entirety of series 5 onto his school chromebook so he could binge-watch it instead of paying attention during class time on Friday. So add “The Power of Three” and “Mummy on the Orient Express” to that list. He was upset that the Shakri have no impact on the rest of the series. He’s the sort of person who expects everything to be about “THE LORE”.

    (Unrelated to Doctor Who, but for some reason, the movie ‘Alien’ also does this to me. I realize it is an important film in the history of sci-fi-horror, I can look at stills of it and recognize them as iconic, but the movie just will not stick in my brain)

    Anyway, I remember that this happened and that I watched it. And most of the Chibnall era is a bit of a blur of course – someone recently quoted in my hearing a Trey Parker quote which, remarkably given the source, seemed apt: If your story can be described by a list of events separated with ‘and then’, you don’t have a plot, just a pile of things; to have a plot, your events should be joined by things like “and therefore” or, “but then”. But this is a big old nothing. I know it happens in China and there are pirates but no piracy and Sea Devils are there but I don’t recall anyone doing anything or why or how or… Anything at all.

    Reply

    • John G Wood
      November 4, 2024 @ 4:35 pm

      Yep, I don’t even recognise the stuff El talks about as something I would be likely to remember if I watched it a second time. In fact, the only thing I remember at all (beyond the basic ‘historical China, with Sea Devils’) is a really ridiculous leap onto a boat that IIRC made me laugh out loud at how unconvincing it was.

      I can’t find it in my heart to hate it, though; it’s not well made enough for that, and has too little to say. It takes something actively toxic and at least vaguely competent to really rouse my ire (Kerblam!, I’m looking at you).

      Reply

    • Chris
      November 4, 2024 @ 4:57 pm

      Most of the Chibnell era episodes were like this for me in an extreme sense. My friend and I would avoid watching for a while, then hate watch a batch of three or four in an afternoon. And each time there was a “previously on…” bit at the beginning I was thankful because I could not remember what happened in the episode that we had finished literally minutes earlier.

      In a way, it’s kind of like the show was produced by The Silence. So that’s neat, kinda.

      Reply

    • Arthur
      November 4, 2024 @ 5:11 pm

      There’s a LOT of the Chibnall era which has that real “slides directly out of your brain five seconds after you’ve watched it” forgettability factor, isn’t there? Legend of the Sea Devils might be the peak though because it’s an episode where I can’t even remember the title without looking it up, which given that four firths of it is the stultifyingly obvious “of the Sea Devils” is incredibly impressive.

      Reply

      • Toby
        November 4, 2024 @ 7:49 pm

        I thought you were being hyperbolic here, and then I realised a few posts down that this episode is called “Legend of the Sea Devils” and NOT “Power of the Sea Devils”.

        Reply

        • Arthur
          November 4, 2024 @ 8:42 pm

          Right? It’s slotted into my head as “the one with the Sea Devils” and my brain refuses to remember more specifics about it – and I can’t really blame it.

          Reply

      • Dave
        November 5, 2024 @ 5:59 am

        Quite the opposite for me. I find it much more memorable than most of the era because of how incompetently it was put together. The early scenes Sandifer describes can’t be washed out of my brain, nor can the murderer-Dan bit.

        (I mean that bit really gets me; of all Doctor Who monsters, it’s really the Silurians and Sea Devils that get the “these are actually a people with a good point, as well as monsters” treatment regularly. Even the Ice Warriors with their Klingon-nobility don’t get that. So making Sea Devils the monsters that Dan happily slays is a baffling idea even before you get to the point that the “everyday bloke” archetype is the one that can take on marauding trained warriors with a sword and win.)

        Orphan-55 literally doesn’t ring any bells for me. I’ve watched it, but I’m really not sure if it’s the one with Jay from the Inbetweeners with green hair or the plastic waste one where the Earth dies at the end. But The Legend of the Sea Devils will always bring to mind that incredibly poor sword fight between the Doctor and the Sea Devil leader, as well as those bits above.

        In my opinion, it’s not forgettable. Although I might wish it was.

        Reply

        • Arthur
          November 5, 2024 @ 7:24 am

          I can remind you of Orphan 55 with one word: “BENNYYYYYYY!”

          Reply

  6. wyngatecarpenter
    November 4, 2024 @ 9:27 am

    I’ve recently rewatched the Pip and Jane Baker stories and they gave me a similar feeling to this , in that they are just a load of things that happen strung together without much sense of a story. The scene where they spring the trap on the Sea Devil was one of those “eh?” moments. It was reminsiscent of a 1960s Batman epsiode except that there it would be an intentional joke that Batman was so implausibly well prepared for every eventuality. Halfway through this episode I seriously began to think that this was the moment that I should stopped watching Doctor Who.

    Reply

  7. wyngatecarpenter
    November 4, 2024 @ 9:29 am

    Surely there would be “no complications” with bringing the Ogrons back?

    Reply

    • wyngatecarpenter
      November 4, 2024 @ 9:29 am

      Sorry, couldn’t resist

      Reply

  8. aubrey
    November 4, 2024 @ 10:37 am

    Honestly one of the more baffling aspects about this story is the co-writing credit because there are few ways in which it makes any sense. Was this a “Ella Road writes it and Chris Chibnall rewrites it to a sufficient degree that he feels he should put his name on it” situation? Because if so it’s an absolutely dismal failure of a rewrite. Was she fulfilling a Malorie Blackman role of providing, like, historical/cultural background or something along those lines? Chris Chibnall single-handedly producing a disaster of a script on this level would be one thing, par for the course by this point in the era. The fact that two writers couldn’t manage something even 10% competent? I mean, face it Tegan, he’s drowned.

    Reply

    • wyngatecarpenter
      November 4, 2024 @ 11:29 am

      Pip and Jane Baker?

      Reply

    • Einarr
      November 4, 2024 @ 11:48 am

      It sounds like Ella Road was brought in mega-frantically with a last minute panic to write a draft in about two or three days, which is why this was never going to be her best work, regardless of her apparent acclaim elsewhere. I assume she had particular input into the Thasmin scene(s), but admittedly that could just be me leaping to that assumption because she’s a queer woman.

      Reply

    • cirkus
      November 4, 2024 @ 11:50 am

      Wikipedia says “Road wrote the episode with Chibnall at his house in Wales over the course of three days. Road stated that she initially expected Chibnall to have an idea for the story drafted when she was hired, but this was not the case. Script editors Becky Roughan and Caroline Buckley also participated in brainstorming sessions.”

      So, it actually took four people to make something this competent.

      Reply

      • Einarr
        November 4, 2024 @ 12:10 pm

        You’ve gotta love that middle sentence, which is peak “oh you haven’t even… you mean there’s no…? righty-ho then”. Similar with how Aisling Bea’s agent asked to see the Eve of the Daleks script before agreeing, and Chibnall couldn’t send it to them because it wasn’t written yet.

        Reply

      • WeslePryce
        November 5, 2024 @ 7:39 pm

        I remember a review from a buffy forum back in the day that talked about how the more names on an episode, the worse it was going to be, because all the visions would crowd each other out and edit over each other until mush is leftover. Throwing more talent at a problem is more indicative of insecurity and fretting than the actual ability of those talents to create something cool. That observation feels somewhat relevant here—four people banging out a script under the leadership of an already deficient writer/editor was always going to be a mess. Then beyond that you have whatever the hell happened behind the scenes on this episode, which we know tantalizingly little about.

        Reply

  9. cirkus
    November 4, 2024 @ 11:48 am

    Chibnall’s written two stories for the Pertwee Lizardmen. The first is about how they’re messy, ordinary people just like us; the second has John Bishop slaughter five of them as a bit.

    The obvious comparison for this is Orphan 55, both are blatant examples of “something visibly went horribly wrong here” in ways that NuWho generally avoids. Thing is, I’m one of a slim few who’ll meekly go to bat for there being a decent episode buried somewhere within O55; LotSD might not be my least favourite episode, but it’s the only one where I genuinely cannot find an episode that works in there.

    As far as I can tell the only real reason for this to exist was to neatly wrap up Thasmin so they didn’t have to deal with it in Power, and, uh, wow. There’s very little I can say that hasn’t been said better elsewhere, but it really astonishes me how eagerly this thin gruel was swallowed. I cannot believe that this was genuinely one of the best queer romances people have seen, and frankly I find it hilarious how “10/Martha was toxic” has become received fan wisdom while the Doctor telling Yaz “yeah I had a wife, but I won’t fw you for, uh, reasons” and it never being fucking brought up again is even a debate.

    Honestly this was the first time I wondered if the show as a whole should’ve ended with 12. There have been some fantastic episodes since (I still love Demons, and RTD2 has had a fair few bangers), but is this all it’s gonna be now? The Doctor going from Curse-Of-The-Time-Lords to “oh I should let people in” and back again in an endless circle? Surely we must be able to do something else with the character?

    Reply

  10. Chris Wuchte
    November 4, 2024 @ 2:36 pm

    My main memories of this are people swinging onto the deck of a ship from… somewhere? Maybe the magical place that net came from?

    The Doctor calling them “Sea Devils”, when that was clearly just a nickname given to them in their initial appearance. And the “Sea Devils” just reacting like “Yep, that’s our name.”

    And wondering why, in the midst of Covid, one would do a story that would require an explanation for why a town is missing most of its citizens, and a ship is missing all of its crew. If you’ve got limitations, make them work for you, not against you.

    Also, yet another story that ends with The Doctor about to sacrifice themselves, only for someone to step up and say “No, please, let me be the one to die.”

    They could have just skipped this one and put the extra money into the surrounding episodes.

    Reply

    • Malk
      November 5, 2024 @ 10:17 pm

      It is kind of… impressive(?) that in an era of stories that lack aboutism and only really exist for the sake of having Doctor Who on the telly, we get this one managing to feel so outrageously pointless. In terms of sheer dropoff in coherency and point, it’s to the rest of the Chibnall era what the Chibnall era is to the rest of Doctor Who.

      Reply

  11. Jesse
    November 4, 2024 @ 3:49 pm

    the visual storytelling is simply not working, such that it is impossible to actually parse events on screen

    I watched this one with my younger kid, and we quickly realized that the story would never be as entertaining as picking apart the basic continuity failures we were witnessing. So…thanks for the father-daughter bonding experience, anyway.

    Reply

  12. Arthur
    November 4, 2024 @ 5:42 pm

    On the episode: for me, the most notable thing about Legend of the Sea Devils is how perfectly it sums up the total collapse of Chibnall’s ambitions for the historical episodes in Series 11.

    I’m sure I’ve gone on about this before here or on your Discord before, but hell with it, I’ll rehash it again because it merits repeating: Chibnall historicals did not used to be like this. They used to be Rosa, Demons of the Punjab, and The Witchfinders, and for all that those stories had their issues, they were going for something a damn slight more ambitious than this, and there was a distinct and specific niche for them which had a different purpose from the “light sci-fi adventure” episodes. They’re clearly positioned to inform and educate as much as entertain in a way the show hadn’t tried since the early Hartnell era.

    Trying to bring back the spirit of season 1 nearly 60 years later might have been a quixotic endeavour, but on the other hand it’s a motive which simultaneously would please the Ian Levine sorts (and the corner of Chibnall’s heart which will always be that awkward teen taking Pip and Jane Baker to task) but also represents a worthwhile experiment, if only because it had been so long since the show had tried anything of that nature that merely making the attempt was in and of itself novel.

    Sure, we can have legitimate objections to how Rosa wrangles the Doctor and her fam into doing a racist act for the sake of timeline conservation or the perfunctory nature in which The Witchfinders engages with 13’s gender (something the rest of the era simply hasn’t bothered to touch), or the way Demons of the Punjab attempts to engage with Partition whilst chickening out of properly examine the British responsibility for it, but it is at least possible to have philosophical objections to that episode of that level of depth.

    (OK, Demons also expects us to believe characters investigating the body of a murdered holy man would somehow miss the gunshot wound that killed him, that’s kind of bad, but it doesn’t derail people’s appreciation of that episode to nearly the extent the conga line of catastrophe does with this episode.)

    In other words, there’s substance there to take issue with the way there just isn’t with Legend, and part of the reason there is that substance is that there is a good faith attempt to attempt to engage with the history. There just isn’t in Legend; you could transpose the entire story to an alien planet or the far future or the prehistoric past or any other historical culture we know of which had a seafaring tradition and bandits predating thereon and it would mean just as much: nothing.

    On the behind-the-scenes story of this episode: yeah, I’m kind of frantic to hear about that too, because there’s clearly a saga here which we know only fragments of. In terms of the show’s fortunes at this point in time, the closest comparison in the classic show is the collapse of the Sixth Doctor era, and in that case we were spoiled by Eric Saward being rampagingly unprofessional enough to start airing all his grievances in interviews more or less as soon as he walked off the show. The Chibnall era hasn’t yet had its Starburst moment, where someone closely involved in its process rips the mask off to show what was going on underneath the surface.

    It’ll come sooner or later, obviously. People stew in their feelings about this sort of thing until they blab, or people retire from the industry and decide “Well, what’s the worst they can do, fire me?” and happen to have sufficient receipts to make a libel action unlikely, or people decide that, god damn it, they’d worked hard on this stuff and people have been terribly unfair about it and it’s at last time to set the record straight about the conditions they were working under so people would give their efforts a fair chance. Personnel will shift over at the management side of the BBC and new regimes will be more relaxed about the errors of their predecessors being exposed – look at how much official Doctor Who stuff acknowledges how badly Colin Baker was treated these days.

    Until then, all we have is speculation and innuendo about Chaos In Cardiff.

    On the Nathan-Turner comparison: yeah, when I reviewed the 2022 specials on my blog (click my name on this comment for link) I led in with a schtick about Chris Chibnall having nightmares in which he transforms into JNT. Except… there’s a big difference here. John Nathan-Turner didn’t write jack shit, and I don’t think he ever had any intention of doing so, because he at least recognised that limitation and because the BBC had rules against producers and script editors commissioning their own scripts and because word-wrangling was his script editors’ job. And like Graham Williams before him, JNT seems to me to be a producer who was very dependent on the script editor he had – Williams starts out strong because he had Robert Holmes on the job and had a pretty solid final season thanks to Douglas Adams, and JNT started out strong with Christopher Bidmead, ended brilliantly with Andrew Cartmel, and what happened in between we all know and shudder at.

    Chibnall doesn’t have that alibi. He doesn’t have a Saward or a Pip and Jane to blame anything on. It’s all on him.

    On the blog: dang it, your mention that you were mirroring your article on Ghost Monument with this one made me go and check whether there’s a mirroring pattern throughout the entire Whittaker Eruditorium, so the Rosa article and Eve of the Daleks article would parallel each other and so on until the whole thing meets in the middle at Fugitive of the Judoon. I either didn’t spot the parallels or they aren’t there in many of the pairings, but the idea of that Fugitive of the Judoon is the omphalos at the centre of the era is horribly tempting, if only because Jo Martin was such a tantalising possibility, and led to such a weird conclusion in The Timeless Children which constitutes more or less the sole fragment (other than “the Flux destroyed a bunch of stuff”) that has survived to RTD2.

    Reply

    • Sofia
      November 8, 2024 @ 12:09 pm

      Obviously this is all on chibnall but one does wonder about the role of matt strevens in all this given that he was consistently the co-exec for the entire era. He seems almost an invisible figure; his only notable contribution seems popping up to give that ill-fated quote about queer representation.

      Reply

      • Arthur
        November 8, 2024 @ 1:55 pm

        A legitimate question, as is “What was his intended role?”, those being two different things.

        Reply

  13. Corey Klemow
    November 4, 2024 @ 6:45 pm

    I’ve nothing to say about an episode with nothing to say, so instead here’s a minor typo correction for the eventual book: rec.arts.drwho (not “doctorwho”). #quotefileitawayforlater

    Reply

  14. Paul Fisher Cockburn
    November 5, 2024 @ 6:22 am

    I can honestly say that the only thing I liked about this story was that it inspired a special trailer in which Tiktok breakout star Nathan Evans provided a Doctor Who adaptation of his chart-topping sea-shanty “Wellerman”.

    “Soon may the Doctor come to bring us danger, adventure then some; one day when the saving is done she’ll take her leave and go.”

    Weirdly, by this time knowing Whittaker was “on the way out”, I found that slightly… melancholic. Which is a stronger reaction than anything the actual episode inspired, apart from: “Oh, they went to the trouble of sourcing the original sound effect from 1972 of a Sea Devil in distress.”

    Reply

  15. WeslePryce
    November 5, 2024 @ 7:36 pm

    I have nothing as insightful as the rest of the commenters here, but I do want to say this: when was the time that Chibnall got closest to writing competent technobabble/exposition? Like, it’s such a ridiculous gap in his DW writing ability—the man cannot write technobabble to save his life. In this episode he handwaves some shit about inverting the earth’s magnetic fields to melt glaciers. This is stooping low even by the standards of the show where David Tennant fought a monster awoken from vestigial genes in humanity by playing piano at it.

    I think the only marginally clever bit of Technobabble I can remember from the Chris Chibnall era was Villa Diodati’s psychic mansion, which of course has the big asterisk of “not actually Chibnall,” and also was somewhat derivative to begin with. Maybe it was the Pting? I genuinely don’t know.

    Reply

    • wyngatecarpenter
      November 7, 2024 @ 7:48 pm

      Pretty poor if a writer who grew up on classic Who can’t write decent technobabble. What did he learn from classic Who exactly if he didn’t learn that?

      Reply

  16. Malk
    November 5, 2024 @ 10:49 pm

    I think what I remember about this one (besides “Don’t let the swords touch your skin!”) is just how revealingly cynical it is: I doubt that Chibnall any interest or passion in the Doctor meeting Madame Ching beyond him googling “FAMOUS HISTORICAL WOMEN”, which… well, makes the fact that Rosa Parks, Mary Seacole and Mary Shelley appeared in the era clearly less about them being worthwhile historical figures who are worth featuring in this show on their own merits. It’s painfully obvious that we only had them show up in Doctor Who because they’re a checklist of Women with Wikipedia pages for the Woman Doctor to meet and rattle off. (No way we’d see the 13th Doctor meet Ada Lovelace if Chibnall had cast a man in the role.) I just think that’s miserable.

    (To say nothing how vilely reductive it is to ignore the intersectionality of Rosa Parks’ identity as a black woman in favour of just marketing her as a famous woman so all the white girlies at home can go “omg she’s such an inspiration” as they hear a generic pop song about rising up, but that’s a bigger can of worms.)

    Reply

    • Arakus
      November 7, 2024 @ 11:37 am

      nitpick but IIRC that song was used frequently in BLM protests (and the director said that’s why it was used)

      Reply

  17. Charlie
    November 6, 2024 @ 6:33 am

    Maybe the single most embarrassing episode of the revived series to watch with non-fans. I mean, is there any competition there?

    Reply

    • Alex B
      November 11, 2024 @ 11:37 am

      Can confirm with gusto – I watched this with my parents in the room, and watching hardcore pornography would have been a less unpleasant experience.

      Not sure if my dad’s constant riffing on the episode’s absolutely glaring failures or my mum snapping at him to give it a rest because we could all see how bad it was and it was making me uncomfortable to keep harping on was worse, but they were a 1-2 punch that takes some beating…

      Reply

  18. Doctor Memory
    November 11, 2024 @ 11:08 am

    (Re-hoisting this from the patreon. If you give El money you could read me blather much earlier. If this is not appealing to you maybe she’ll create a “no-Doctor-Memory tier” for her patreon that will filter me out?)

    At last. I’ve been waiting for this one for so long now. Because here is my hot take: this is not the most bewilderingly incompetent episode of Doctor Who produced in the modern era. That’s just the wrong lens to look at it through. What this is, is an unofficial sequel to The Wrath of Eukor.

    Okay, a quick digression: back in the 1980s, a newly graduated student filmmaker in Seattle WA by the name of Ryan K. Johnson made a series of unauthorized Doctor Who episodes to be screened at some local conventions. He cast a local stage actress by the name of Barbara Benedetti as the Doctor, and everyone adopted British accents of… let’s say variable levels of fealty. The videos were actually kinda popular on the fan circuit at the time: I remember watching them (on the inevitable 4th-gen VHS copy) at a tiny Doctor Who fan club meeting in Michigan as a teenager. And of course the hook was obvious: a female Doctor! What a novel, quirky concept!

    Flash forward nearly 40 years, wherein a female Doctor is still a novel, quirky concept, and we come to Legend of the Sea Devils. From all accounts a last-minute order tacked on to the end of the production run at a time when Chibnall was probably already packing up his office, this obviously presented a number of logistical problems of a really basic sort like “who the hell am I going to get to make this?” And rather than doing what showrunners have traditionally done in this kind of jam and gotten a reliable old hand to crank out a script that could be shot in a warehouse, Chris Chibnall decided to… let a pair of just-graduated students do it.

    There’s no getting around this. Haolu Wang, the director, doesn’t even have a wikipedia entry. She does have an IMDB page however, and prior to being hired to shoot the penultimate episode of a season of the BBC’s flagship export show, her directing credits consisted of six short films, the final one of which (“The Pregnant Ground”) was per her website her final film school project.

    The resume of Ella Road, the credited co-writer, is at this point nearly as thin: prior to writing the script, her credits consisted of two stage plays and an episode of the British remake of “Call My Agent.”

    So yeah: why is this episode like this? Why does everything about it make no sense, from the pacing to the blocking to the setting to the characters’ motivations to the scene-to-scene edits? Because it was literally made by a just-graduated film student. This is a student film being aired under the banner of “Doctor Who”, nominally the most famous show the BBC produces.

    You could look at this as the ultimate failure of Chris Chibnall’s alleged primary advantage as a showrunner: a man who was on paper a seasoned professional with decades of TV experience was confronted with a crisis and rather than managing his way out of it, he dumped it into the laps of a pair of talented but inexperienced recent graduates (quite possibly having thought no more about the matter than “let’s hire a director who’s Chinese!”) and let them completely humiliate themselves in public by producing the most unwatchably bad episode of Doctor Who in four decades. And there is a lot to recommend that point of view: little things like “nearly all of the available evidence” and “seriously, just look at it.”

    But I choose a redemptive reading: think of “Legend of the Sea Devils” not as a shocking faceplant by a team of alleged professionals. Think of it instead as the highest-budgeted unauthorized fan-made Doctor Who episode ever created, and a long-simmering sequel to one of the most obscure bits of Doctor Who “content” ever produced. Ms. Benedetti and Ms. Whitaker even rocked similar haircuts: it’s the Revenge of Eukor!

    And there’s even a kind of happy ending here: amazingly and happily, this did not murder Haolu Wang’s career in its infancy! She’s gone on to do more TV work, including an upcoming episode of Black Mirror. Frankly, RTD should bring her on to do some 2nd-unit work at a minimum: the show owes her one.

    Anyway if you’re curious, you can watch The Wrath of Eukor on youtube. It’s not great, but it’s definitely better than “Legend of the Sea Devils”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LgCYTZn1tw

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.