Gaze not into the abyss lest you accidentally write a book

Skip to content

Elizabeth Sandifer

Elizabeth Sandifer created Eruditorum Press. She’s not really sure why she did that, and she apologizes for the inconvenience. She currently writes Last War in Albion, a history of the magical war between Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. She used to write TARDIS Eruditorum, a history of Britain told through the lens of a ropey sci-fi series. She also wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk, writes comics these days, and has ADHD so will probably just randomly write some other shit sooner or later. Support Elizabeth on Patreon.

27 Comments

  1. Tezz
    September 16, 2024 @ 5:49 am

    A sideways comment as we reach Flux, about Chibnall’s ability to create some of the best episode titles, yet also some of the absolute worst. With a huge dose of nostalgic tradition too.

    “The Ghost Monument” is a great title. A not-so-great episode, but such an evocative title. One of the best. I also love “The Haunting of Villa Diodati”. With Chibnall’s era, it feels like you could strike gold or fall flat, with titles, and this one works a treat. In another timeline, we would’ve had “The Desolation Mystery” and “The Lone Cyberman”, respectively. At least these episodes don’t go for the obvious. More on that later.

    “The Tsuranga Conundrum” is just sci-fi nonsense. ‘Conundrum’ feels like it was chosen because he opened a thesaurus at ‘problem’, but ultimately it’s a lame title because, uh, every episode has a problem for the characters to solve. (TTC also crops up again the year after, and becomes so infamous that anyone who writes “TTC” knows which episode it refers to even though it’s shared with another episode.) This episode is tricky to find a half-decent title for though. Maybe it should’ve just gone for the at-least-intriguing-to-audiences, “P’ting!”

    “The Witchfinders” feels plucked out of the Hartnell era, and I love it for that.

    “The Battle of Ranskoor Av Kolos” is another nonsense. The episode doesn’t contain a battle, and Ranskoor Av Kolos is just sci-fi guff again. Worse, it’s just unmemorable, to the point where it’s become way more fun to give it wacky alternative titles every time it gets mentioned. I also can’t help but think back to The Writer’s Tale, in which RTD comes up with a “Battle” title and then kicks it to the curb because “battle is a rubbish word.” Mind you, at least we didn’t get “The Ux Dilemma” or “The Legend of Tzim-Sha” or something equally naff.

    “Resolution” is so vague a word… but also fitting thematically… but it also feels like it should have “of the Daleks” tagged on… but it also feels like that would’ve been too obvious… but “Resolution” also feels like Chibnall wrote an epilogue episode (a truer finale) to Series 11 and couldn’t actually come up with a title so he just went with the working title of “[Series] Resolution” instead.

    “Spyfall” Parts 1 and 2 is the first of its kind since “The End of Time” in 2009/2010. It feels like it’s been done to be epic, but (cynically) it also feels like Chibnall couldn’t come up with another title/James Bond pun. I guess, given that it was originally planned to air consecutively over 2 days, it does make it feel a bit more of a grander feeling. It’s also the first two-parter of Chibnall’s era, so fair enough. Aside from that, however, it’s also a terrible pun. Wordplay on “Skyfall” from James Bond but that was the name of his home in that story – so what the heck is “Spyfall” trying to do?! It’d be just as crap IMO, but surely “From Gallifrey With Love” would’ve worked better, or pretty much anything else fans have come up with whilst playing with Bond puns. It makes for a fun game; my favourite crap Who/Bond title is “Kasaavin Royale”.

    “Fugitive of the Judoon” is fitting, but also kind of a shame given we’ve already had “Prisoner of the Judoon”, “Judgement of the Judoon” and “Revenge of the Judoon”. Two of those weren’t on TV though, at least. It’s also the first “X of the Y” title for a returning monster, and this becomes a pattern for Chibnall – like fannish tradition. We’ll come to those shortly.

    “Ascension of the Cybermen” – again, it works. The Cybermen want to ascend. But for some reason I can’t help but think this was Chibnall with the thesaurus out again, because we’ve already had “Rise of the Cybermen”. It feels empty, the way “Attack of the Cybermen” does, to me. It’s also strange that Series 12 opens and closes with a two-parter, yet the first is “TITLE Part 1 / Part 2” and the finale is two distinct titles. Just feels odd in the same series. Maybe I’m overthinking it.

    Then we get an 1980s throwback, “R of the Daleks”. After the previous NYD special, it feels almost like an apology to those fans who thought the earlier special should’ve been “Resolution of the Daleks”. I don’t mind the fact it’s another “R of the Daleks”, honestly, but it gets jumbled in my head because we also have “Evolution of the Daleks”. Given the shopping list nature of the episode, it just feels a shame he didn’t give this a more unique title. I feel as though it would’ve had something poetic or abstract had it been in the Moffat era.

    “The Halloween Apocalypse” – can’t decide if I love it or hate it. Again, part of me thinks Chibnall is riffing on another seasonal title, “The Christmas Invasion”. (Shame the Sea Devil special isn’t “The Easter Calamity” or something for a nice set of three.) Then again, at least it isn’t “Trick or Treat” or something lame.

    “War of the Sontarans” brings me back to my earlier point, which I’ll elaborate more on. Aside from “Resolution”, all the returning monsters get “X of the Y” when they come back. “Fugitive of the Judoon”, “Ascension of the Cybermen”, “Revolution of the Daleks”, “War of the Sontarans”, “Village of the Angels”, “Eve of the Daleks”, “Legend of the Sea Devils”. Only the Master misses out, though he’s never featured in an episode title to date. “War of the Sontarans” also feels inanely bland – they’re war loving potato heads, for goodness sake, so we know their whole shtick is war. It just feels like one of those titles which could feasibly apply to any Sontaran story – it’s not unique or interesting, which sucks given the episode feels like it’s trying to do new things with the Sontarans. Heck, it’s not much of a change, but I feel like “Occupation of the Sontarans” would’ve been slightly more interesting.

    “The Vanquishers” doesn’t pass the same way “The Witchfinders” did. This one feels like a lazy title, especially one coming at the conclusion of a six-part serial. Maybe it’s fitting, however, that a crap title sits at the top of a crap conclusion. (The previous week’s “Survivors of the Flux” is also pretty generic and forgettable, given that the episode itself brings in more of Passenger, the Ravagers, Division and Tecteun, etc.)

    “The Power of the Doctor” is in a similar vein to “The Day of the Doctor”, I guess, in that it’s kind of generic but befitting a big standalone special. The problem is… what’s the power in question, really? The power of friendship? The power she has to magically implant hologram-Doctors for plot convenience? Having ribbed it a little, it’s hard to imagine what else such an episode could be called since it’s rammed full of nostalgia. “The Power of the Doctor” at least sounds all-encompassing, and works for PR, posters, etc. in a build up to a standalone regeneration special which they want as many people to tune in for as possible.

    Reply

    • Aristide Twain
      September 16, 2024 @ 6:25 am

      Oh, no, “Fugitive of the Judoon” does not work! I will not give it that! It’s bad syntax is what it is. “Fugitive of the [Pursuers]” is not a structure that had ever been used before this script, and I deeply regret that Big Finish’s “Fugitive of the Daleks” has created precedent for using it again. You don’t say a wanted criminal is a “fugitive of the police”! That’s not how “of the” works! I try not to be a prescriptivist in most things, but that one really rubs me the wrong way for some reason. I guess because it smacks of smacking keywords into the “X of the Y” structure without actually thinking it through.

      Reply

      • Perry
        September 16, 2024 @ 6:42 am

        Should’ve just called it The Fugitive.

        Reply

        • Rob
          September 16, 2024 @ 12:22 pm

          “I didn’t kill my space wife!”
          “I don’t care.”

          Reply

    • Daibhid C
      September 16, 2024 @ 2:51 pm

      I agree that “Resolution of the Daleks” is too obvious. I’m not sure that not actually using the whole thing makes it less obvious. It’s an “R of the Daleks” title that’s pretending not to be and not fooling anyone.

      Reply

  2. Aristide Twain
    September 16, 2024 @ 6:30 am

    Continuing a trend from your bafflement at certain reactions to RTD!Sutekh, I’ll register that I, for one, thought Swarm and Azure were more than “pleasantly unsettling” (though they are that, too). More seriously, not only are the designs striking, but the performances really are great — not just the two primary ones but also Matthew Needham as Swarm’s previous incarnation, for what little material he gets. And Whittaker has more subtext-charged-enemies chemistry with Spruell’s Swarm than she ever had with Dhawan, even though I wouldn’t say the Whittaker/Dhawan pairing fails to throw up sparks precisely. I have no idea in which sense you thought of them as getting “annoying” — well, except for the small matter of their overall plotline being an underwhelming shaggy-dog labyrinth. But that’s not a problem in individual scenes at a vibes level.

    Reply

    • Ross
      September 16, 2024 @ 8:53 am

      They’re unsettling and they’re deliciously hammy, but mostly I am let down by the fact that they seem to have no particular motive and LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE the purpose they serve in the story is muddy. The series has a dozen different villains with different agendas, and these two are the ones coded as the “real” villains, but… They’re not overly responsible for the overarching storyline, their motives are just “We are agents of chaos and destruction who just like being evil”. There’s only one point where they present any sort of threat to the main characters, and that’s quickly dispensed with, and the characters themselves are casually dismissed by someone else at the end of the series (When in good time we get to it, I will have feelings about the anthropomorphism of Time, an idea I absolutely love for its Sapphire and Steel-ness, but which predictably Chibnall completely fails to do anything of value with).

      Reply

      • Perry
        September 16, 2024 @ 5:24 pm

        I don’t remember what Swarm and Azure’s plan was, and I struggled to grasp it even back then – in any of the six episodes. I remember watching week to week, frustratedly asking “but what are they doing, and why?!” Am I being thick? I can’t bare any rewatch.

        Shame that Azure is largely redundant as a character too. Not sure why she even exists. I’m not entirely sure the story knows either.

        Reply

        • Ross
          September 16, 2024 @ 11:03 pm

          I think it was just “destroy the universe and rule the ashes”. But it doesn’t really change much about the story if they aren’t there at all.

          I THINK the Division conspired to release them because their MO of releasing the time storm to ravage the universe helped with their plan to use the Flux to destroy the universe? (This turns out to have been a bad move, of course), but it’s not clear they actually accomplished much in that respect. They do take out Division, but only… To just go ahead and do the same thing Division was already planning?

          It’s all just such a mess. I’ve had it explained to me, but I still struggle to make sense of the narrative as a whole; it’s mostly just “things happen and then more things happen” with no underlying “why” or “to what end?” to link it together.

          Reply

  3. Cyrano
    September 16, 2024 @ 9:11 am

    My brain has seized on the line “A sustained tone—essentially three and a half years pass between The Timeless Children and The Star Beast—of Doctor Who that blatantly isn’t in conversation with prestige television but with shovelwatch cult shows like Wynonna Earp or Supernatural, and that isn’t even faring well with that comparison.”

    Because…is Davies or Moffat Who routinely in conversation with prestige television? Possibly at times (you could point to Dot & Bubble and Rogue as very obviously in some kind of relationship with Black Mirror and Bridgerton respectively – though are those prestige TV? Maybe 73 Yards, with its focus on Ruby’s interiority and lack of easy technobabbly answers, though those features left El a bit cold in practice…) but not, arguably as a basic and reliable mode. Certainly The Star Beast, in which Miriam Margoyles plays a naughty space hamster who can mind control soldiers, is unrepentantly genre fare, albeit genre with a heart and a decent social conscience. Wild Blue Yonder is in conversation with Arthur C Clarke and Stephen Moffat and the Giggle is mostly concerned with its relationship with Doctor Who itself, past and future.

    I don’t think it’s necessary to elevate other eras of Who to the ranks of prestige television (or conversation with prestige television) in order to denigrate Chibnall’s efforts. I think both are unrepentant genre TV, it’s just Davies’ version of it is far more often better produced, better written and cares about things outside its own mythology. Chibnall’s is poorly written on a line by line basis, and shambolically produced.

    In some respects, Chibnall’s Who resembles one version of prestige TV more than Davies. Flux, in its location hopping structure and focus on the intrigue of different agencies resembles a cargo cult Game of Thrones. Just…not very good.

    Reply

    • Rob
      September 16, 2024 @ 11:56 am

      I think this line has to do with the fact that when Chibnall Who debuted, it was marketed and discussed as if DW was being elevated to a Broadchurch-level of prestige British TV. Davis and Moffat DW never tried to be that (well, maybe some of Moffat’s, but never Davies’).

      Reply

      • Einarr
        September 16, 2024 @ 11:59 am

        Indeed. The Chibnall era clearly WANTS to be compared to prestige TV, that’s very visible in the filming style, the cinematography, the aesthetic trappings, and as you say the explicit comments of the creatives themselves about wanting to ensure the show could compete with such prestige TV big beasts. Which I think it only half-succeeded at seriously, visibly attempting in Series 11, and half-succeeded is probably pretty generous at that.

        Reply

      • Lambda
        September 16, 2024 @ 2:51 pm

        Indeed I think being really good television is actually broadly incompatible with being prestige television, because prestige television has to fit in with the cultural hegemony and tell high-status people that the power structures they sit at the top of make sense and they really are more important and deserving than low-status people. That the system is not the problem.

        Reply

        • weronika mamuna
          September 16, 2024 @ 3:28 pm

          does it…? have to do that…..?

          Breaking Bad, Mad Men, The Wire, Mr. Robot…?

          Reply

        • Brian B.
          September 17, 2024 @ 12:41 am

          Yeah, I’m with Weronika in her complete puzzlement, with “the Wire” and “Mr. Robot” being great shows about the total moral bankruptcy of the system. Beyond those, hmm; “Halt and Catch Fire” tells the story of non-wealthy tech folks who try to make the budding computer industry be about doing good, far more than about making money, and it’s clear that they lose in the end. My friends tell me that “Succession” is about what dreadful and destructive people the Murdoch family are. If “Fleabag” and “the Good Place” count as prestige TV, and they should, neither of them are pro-establishment and the latter questions everything.

          To me it always felt like Moffat tried hard, in series six, to put Doctor Who in the prestige-TV conversation. He failed and moved on.

          Reply

    • Elizabeth Sandifer
      September 16, 2024 @ 11:34 pm

      Thumbing your nose and making fart jokes at something is a conversation.

      Reply

    • thehomeworkogre
      September 27, 2024 @ 12:56 pm

      The first Davies era sort of predates (or at least coincides with) the rise of Prestige Television as a cultural force that dominated the conversation around television. Series 6 (the BBC America season, aka The One With All the Money) was, to me, very obviously an attempt to turn Doctor Who into a kind of Prestige show, or at least a show that nobody is embarrassed to push at Americans.

      Reply

      • Ross
        September 27, 2024 @ 5:29 pm

        I would even say that the first Davies era was one of the big formative influences on the rise of Prestige Television, even though it did not fall under the auspices of it itself.

        Reply

  4. Rob
    September 16, 2024 @ 12:05 pm

    It’s pure heresay, but I read somewhere, can’t remember where, that Chibnall was offered the showrunning job 2 or 3 times before finally saying yes. Not sure if it was in the same source, but I also read that he said yes because no further Who was planned after Twice Upon a Time.
    So we have a showrunner working under duress, making a TV show under direr and direr circumstances, simply because he doesn’t want his fave show to end. No wonder the era feels like it’s the very definition of treading water. It’s the one thing that softens my opinion of him as a DW showrunner. Because personally I don’t think, if the show had ended after Moffat, that Davies would have come back for RTD2.

    Reply

    • Perry
      September 16, 2024 @ 5:29 pm

      And yet, Chibnall has said this:

      Chibnall admits that he took a long time to commit: “I finally said yes because I love the show to my bones. I resisted it for a very long time, and [the BBC] really had to woo me.

      “But, in the end, I had ideas about what I wanted to do with it. When I went to them and said, ‘This is what I would do’, I actually expected them to say, ‘Ooh, let’s talk about that’, but they said: ‘Great!’”

      Chibnall can’t reveal yet what his daring conceit for the series is but would he, for example, be allowed to do a whole-series story­line, like Broadchurch, rather than individual episodes? “Yes. What the BBC was after was risk and boldness.” But he couldn’t kill the Doctor off in episode 1? “Ha! Then the title would really make sense.”

      So he did have ideas…? Or did he only start formulating ideas after he realised they wanted him for the job? (Cynically, the whole Timeless Children stuff makes me think it was some half-baked fanfic he came up with aged 8 and finally got chance to make ‘canon’.)

      Reply

  5. J Westwood
    September 16, 2024 @ 1:39 pm

    If you wanted to end Doctor Who, that last trilogy of Moffat stories wouldn’t have been a bad note, to be fair. After “The Doctor Falls” I’ve always had a “Well, we’ve said everything that could be said with this character.” sort of feeling to new Doctor Who. Not that I’m actively against more but more that I don’t exactly NEED more and, when it’s not good, I don’t have the same kind of loyalty to check in week-to-week.

    Reply

    • Perry
      September 16, 2024 @ 5:34 pm

      I’m on exactly the same wavelength, and articulated it better than I’ve been able to. By the end of Capaldi, we’ve done just about everything seemingly possible with the lead character (we got the grandpa one, the cosmic hobos, the harder edged ones, the young ones, the old ones, the manipulative ones, the foppy ones…) and the show has explored pretty much every genre several times over. I struggled to see Capaldi as the Doctor for a while, as it aired, but by his finale I truly felt like his Doctor was the one that felt most like the encapsulation of literally every incarnation prior to him. This was an incarnation who’d had one more shot at life than he’d anticipated (Smith gets given new regeneration energy, thus a whole new cycle/life he never thought about before) and decides, actually, in The Doctor Falls, nah, he’s done now. It’s very much a full stop, until Twice Upon A Time happens and, obviously, the show goes on. But everything since has felt like a show I can take or leave. It feels like the story of Doctor Who was done in 2017, and now we’re just (to use El’s own analogy) getting some bonus tracks.

      Reply

  6. Dysnomian
    September 16, 2024 @ 9:41 pm

    Quick question for the series in general- which new books which came out since the finishing of past Tardis Eruditorum entries would deserve their own Time Has Been Rewrittens?

    Reply

  7. Citizen Alan
    September 17, 2024 @ 1:16 am

    I think Dan was possibly the worst companion of the new era. Probably my least favorite since Peri and Tegan. He started off as someone the Doctor rescued and dragged around the cosmos, but they had surprisingly little interaction. He was really more like Yaz’s companion, and I honestly wish less time had been spent on the Doctor’s tedious story and more on Yaz, Dan, and Jericho being all Tomb Raider in ancient Egypt.

    But the thing I hated most about the whole Flux storyline (aside from the fact that nothing was ever explained) was that it was my worst nightmare about Timeless Child made manifest. It turns out that the Doctor’s greatest enemy, one who puts the Master and the Daleks to shame, was someone we’ve never heard of who she defeated millions of years earlier in some of Chibnall’s fanfic.

    I will give Chibnall this: He had one genuinely clever idea–the Lupari, a race of highly intelligent, humanoid dogs who apparently were genetically engineered in the future to be man’s best friend. And they kind of recent mankind for it. So naturally, Chibs has to exterminate them all for shock value. Just like he killed off Jericho because “here’s an interesting character! I better kill him off for cheap shocks and also so RTD can’t use him more effectively than I did.”

    Reply

    • Madeline Jones
      September 17, 2024 @ 2:02 am

      Especially because at least from my opinion, the Lupari were quite an impressive achievement in costume design. You’d think after seeing how well they were realized you’d want to keep a race like that around for future stories.

      But I guess we really needed to soak in that Karvinista (yes I had to look his name up) and the Doctor now have a commonality of both being the last of their kind so we can have that important exchange of the Doctor going “So what will you do now?” and Dogface basically going “Ehh, fuck if I know.”

      And of course, that whole “possibly the Doctor’s first ever companion?” thread that as expected went absolutely nowhere.

      Reply

  8. wyngatecarpenter
    September 17, 2024 @ 5:05 am

    The Halloween Apocalypse just seemed like a massively long trailer for the upcoming season rather than an actual episode.
    There was one thing I liked about Flux which was that disruption to the universe and the displacement of the characters felt as if it really did reflect what the world had just gone through, but I’ve no idea whether that was intentional.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.