The struggle in terms of the strange

Skip to content

Jack Graham

Jack Graham writes and podcasts about culture and politics from a Gothic Marxist-Humanist perspective. He co-hosts the I Don't Speak German podcast with Daniel Harper. Support Jack on Patreon.


  1. frank fair
    March 21, 2014 @ 6:10 am

    I have had an actual nightmare years ago where I was the last Who fan left who didn't like Moffat's version of Who. And everyone else was saying things like "Turn off your brain and enjoy" or "If you squint hard and then it's sort of about this bland tihng" or "My girlfriend loves it so there can't be a problem"

    After the first few episodes of Series 6 I thought 'That's it, I've grown up, I'm too critical I probably wouldn't enjoy Gridlock or Carnival of the Monsters anymore either'. Thank goodness I thought better

    Thanks Jack for this critical brilliantly worded article. You never descend into pettiness like other Moff critics, you're ultimately very fair and you get so much right. Now in an ideal world the scales would fall from people's eyes, Beast Below would be burnt, and "I've just trodden in a Wedding of River Song" would enter common parlance. But I know that's not going to happen

    It's enough you help me remember it's not 'wrong' to feel this way.
    For 4 years I really haven't liked my all time's favourite show (with a few exceptions), and that's a pity because I liked parts of all other eras but at least I'm not alone. So thank you again. Take a bow

    BTW Don't suppose you've read "proper writer" Naomi Alderman's 11th Doctor book Borrowed Time Just discovered it-brilliant and actually about something. May now be my favourite story of the era.


  2. Matthew Celestis
    March 21, 2014 @ 12:39 pm

    Good for you.

    Moffat's writing is just unbearably awful. I can never read too much criticism of his work.


  3. liminalD
    March 21, 2014 @ 2:13 pm

    It was a good read, and you make some brilliant observations (Moffat being the Great Intelligence, for one – I laughed at that because it's just so true), but I'm not entirely convinced. I'd like to hear you elaborate a bit more on your reasoning behind the Silurians as Palestinians, in light of what some of the comments said about them being a better analogy for Nazis, particularly. And I flat-out disagree about Rory being the 'nice guy' and the Silents not being all that evil – I think it's pretty clear that the Silents are a metaphor for government/religious (and possibly even business) forces quietly manipulating society for their own ends, on the one hand an embodiment of a particularly American paranoia, and on the other an actual auteur attack on the state of American politics as seen from a more international perspective.

    Of course, you do say at the beginning that it is a polemic (which some people in the comments seem not to have understood or registered), and that there is a lot more that you would have liked to have said but you lacked the time and space to do so, I'd be interested to read the expanded version if you put it up one day. But Your post seems to be generating some good discussion of the issues, and comes across as far more reasoned and fair than a lot of the STFU Moffat stuff out there, so I think you've done an admirable job. Well done ๐Ÿ™‚


  4. Jack Graham
    March 22, 2014 @ 4:42 am

    On the Silurians and Silence. As usual, I have caused myself problems by not making myself sufficiently clear. The Silurians are analogous to the Silurians within the schema of Doctor Who because they are the displaced who wait eternally for justice. The point was that the question is left unexamined because it is evident to the creators of the text that the existing system is inescapable. I understand why and how the Silence are meant to be evil; I just don't think they do anything in the course of the story in question which demonstrates how they're any worse than Nixon. The point was that the question is left unexamined because it is evident to the creators of the text that the existing system is inescapable.

    And yes, the longer and expanded (properly sourced and researched) version will hopefully see the light of day one day fairly soon.

    And thanks for putting me above STFU Moffat, even if that is faint praise. I tried to stay away from anything personal. And thanks for noticing that I was deliberately writing a polemic. As you say, that passed many of them by.


  5. 5tephe
    March 23, 2014 @ 4:45 pm

    Jack – I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. Every episode of the Moffat era has rung as false to my wife, myself, and our close friends. To read so many people praising and loving his work over on the Eruditorum was frankly weird. (I know there are dissenting voices, but overall it seems people really love Moffat over there.)

    You have managed to articulate every part of the current era that I have hated, along with crystalising several niggling irks I have with it, but couldn't have expressed myself. I've only wandered over here every now and then in the past, but you will find me a more frequent visitor in future.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.