Gaze not into the abyss lest you accidentally write a book

Skip to content

Elizabeth Sandifer

Elizabeth Sandifer created Eruditorum Press. She’s not really sure why she did that, and she apologizes for the inconvenience. She currently writes Last War in Albion, a history of the magical war between Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. She used to write TARDIS Eruditorum, a history of Britain told through the lens of a ropey sci-fi series. She also wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk, writes comics these days, and has ADHD so will probably just randomly write some other shit sooner or later. Support Elizabeth on Patreon.

19 Comments

  1. James Whitaker
    May 17, 2025 @ 7:36 pm

    As you say, the rare Doctor Who episode that feels like it can’t be separated from its cultural moment, despite that clearly not being the intent when written. Really not sure how I feel about it. Love the insanity of bringing back both the Ranis and Susan in an episode that isn’t really about either.

    Reply

  2. AJ McKenna
    May 17, 2025 @ 8:02 pm

    Re: ‘Hell poppy’ – there’s a 1940s movie called ‘Hellzapoppin’ which is considered one of the earliest and most flagrant examples of fourth wall-breaking in the history of cinema. It’s probably completely unrelated but…there has been a lot of that in these last two series…
    https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Film/Hellzapoppin

    Reply

  3. Corey Klemow
    May 17, 2025 @ 8:18 pm

    When Cora’s song was initially met with silence, I thought we’d get something more thoughtful – that the song would not, in fact, cure an entire audience of their rancid bigotry in under two minutes. The silence could have been followed by boos and insults being thrown, followed by a scene where a couple of people from the audience approach her and say that they were affected by it. A small victory; the very beginnings to a possible reconsideration of anti-Hellion bigotry, a few people at a time. Instead we got… slow clap. Which, yeah, you can tack on for yourself that maybe the clapping wasn’t sincere and nothing will change, but it also doesn’t seem like that’s what Dawson was going for there.

    I enjoyed an awful lot of this, but that… ? Geesh.

    Reply

  4. Utku
    May 17, 2025 @ 8:21 pm

    I am pretty sure the authorial intent does not end with the script. The shot of burning farms during the genocide is such a strong image for anyone following Gaza and West Bank in the last two years. So I find it more difficult to not read any of this outside the context of the Palestinian genocide.

    And I think the episode elevates itself slightly above “fine people on both sides” just by doing something it usually does not do: vilify the Doctor’s actions. It’d be pretty standard of the show if the Doctor stopped the kid, preached about how violence was not the answer and yada yada. But instead, it makes the Doctor part of that cycle of violence, by turning its hero into a torturer, someone to be appalled by. In fact, I’d go as far as to say that the revengeful kid is essentially whitewashed from his sins by the Doctor becoming his torturer in an uncharacteristic fit of rage. By making the Doctor commit to that violence, the show gave legitimacy to the position the villain found himself in. The gist of the episode was that violence begets violence, which is inarguably true even if it’s a basic messaging, and even a hero can be a part of that violence.

    Reply

  5. Drew Venna
    May 17, 2025 @ 8:48 pm

    It’s a weird one where this episode is almost a dark mirror to The Story and the Engine for me. I didn’t find Story and Engine too enjoyable, it was a little too sloppy, but I am totally willing to give it a pass on that because it’s so nice the Doctor got out to Africa and we got that piece of a culture, from a writer aligned with that culture.

    And then we have this, which I found more enjoyable all the way through (that shot of the bodies flowing up is so good…at first I thought it was debris, and then it dawned on me ‘Oh no, it’s all the people’. But you put in the light of the Palestinian genocide and the Doctor harming Kid but never having gone out of his way to stop the Corporation and it leaves a sour taste in the mouth, almost like I should feel guilty for having enjoyed it.

    Finally, Panjabi rules and I’m excited to see her in action, even if I wonder how they will make the Rani work differently from the Master.

    Reply

    • Madeline Jones
      May 17, 2025 @ 10:19 pm

      I’ve always been amused at how much Missy (at least to me) always made much more sense in her original debut as an interation of the Rani than as a female Master. Now, we’ve got the inverse of that. Mrs. Flood’s bonkers acting throughout this season coupled with the camp haughtiness of the new Rani itself screams more “female Master” to me than Missy ever did, but I’ll be interested to see what the next two episodes do with her.

      Reply

      • Ross
        May 17, 2025 @ 10:47 pm

        While I’m curious and confident RTD will pull it off, “Mrs Flood was the Rani all along” makes sense only in the very fannish sense of “The Rani is literally the only recurring classic female villain and thus she is the obvious candidate for ANY female villain coded as Important”. The Rani’s only character traits were that she was a mad scientist and she was “What if Master but Girl?” breaking the fourth wall, being affably evil in the manner of a dotty old woman, or dressing up as past companions? None of that has balls-all to do with the Rani (Okay, yeah, she cosplayed as Mel for one scene).

        The Rani is the least interesting thing for Mrs. Flood to be, and it makes me actively angry for them to prove right all the fans who assumed she was the Rani from the beginning purely BECAUSE of the whole “Only female villain” thing. But still, it’s something we can work with.

        Does she, as a scientist, hold a grudge over the Doctor making the universe more supernatural? An angle of “She wants dominion over the natural laws of the universe itself” thing is a plausible Rani plot, and “As a scientist, what I want is to kill God” is at least a little amusing.

        Reply

        • Corey Klemow
          May 18, 2025 @ 1:11 am

          “Then tell your maker I will come to storm down his gates of gold and seize his kingdom in my true name.” –Holy crap, your suggestion actually works with what we’ve seen so far from Mrs. Flood AND with The Rani’s original introduction as an amoral scientist who is also the deposed ruler of an alien world. Fingers crossed we get something like this and not just Missy 2 and Missy 3!

          Reply

  6. Brian B.
    May 17, 2025 @ 10:38 pm

    Quality and politics aside, I feel this episode would have been more spectacular if it had come out before 2018, when Catherynne Valente’s exuberantly inventive novel ‘Space Opera’ perfected the “Earth’s future depends on an interstellar Eurovision Song Contest” subgenre at the same time it invented it.

    I’m not even criticizing the episode! Just, if you liked it, holy cow do I have a novel to recommend for you. Also, note to myself that I still need to pick up its sequel, ‘Space Oddity’.

    Reply

    • Einarr
      May 18, 2025 @ 12:57 am

      She didn’t invent it. As noted in the review, Gareth Roberts has a version of that premise from 2002.

      Reply

      • Kit
        May 18, 2025 @ 1:48 am

        (Clay’s premise, Roberts’ details, iirc)

        Reply

      • Brian B.
        May 18, 2025 @ 1:56 am

        Ok, so she just perfected it! It’s still marvelous. Did Roberts actually produce anything, or just spout the idea?

        Reply

        • Einarr
          May 18, 2025 @ 2:45 am

          There’s a 2 hour Big Finish audio with this premise at its centre called Bang-Bang-a-Boom!

          Reply

    • Iain Mew
      May 18, 2025 @ 2:23 am

      I haven’t read it since 2018, but the episode shared even less with the novel than I expected

      Reply

  7. Solon Discate
    May 18, 2025 @ 12:29 am

    To compare these last two oddly bi-generated series, I think on balance I preferred last year’s take on “the Doctor gets pushed to an emotional extreme against a number of gay signifiers”

    Reply

  8. Rei Maruwa
    May 18, 2025 @ 12:45 am

    I sure hope that the Doctor responding to “you scared me when you tortured a guy in front of me” with “Bel, I was triggered” was, like, supposed to be as darkly manipulative as it clearly is.

    Reply

    • Dr. Happypants
      May 18, 2025 @ 1:26 am

      I also thought it was a bit creepy how intent the Doctor was on making Belinda enjoy his adventuring. She never wanted to be there! She’s just a poor bystander who’s been abducted and tormented. Her time in the TARDIS has been a nightmare. The part where she seems to feel almost guilty for not having told the Doctor he’s wonderful… Is it me, or does Belinda almost sound like a hostage? On top of the stuff in Robot Revolution that seemed to draw some equivalence between the Doctor and toxic masculinity, there is a very weird vibe here. Is it deliberate? Is it going to be addressed?

      Reply

      • weronika mamuna
        May 18, 2025 @ 1:51 am

        will it perhaps lead to the Doctor being disgusted with maleness and choosing a female form next? we can only hope

        Reply

  9. Daniel
    May 18, 2025 @ 2:38 am

    I enjoyed it a lot. I did have that moment of thinking, uh oh we’re doing Kerblam again… and then the Hellions got to make a protest at the end speaking/singing out to the billions of viewers.

    Okay fine, the Doctor doesn’t go and blow up the corporation at the end. But you’ve still got Doctor Who going out just before Eurovision suggesting that “umm actually the EBU doesn’t want certain people to be seen because capitalism.” An episode written by a trans author, nabbing an idea from a transphobe, and gaying up a contest which doesn’t allow pride flags.

    Ok yes, reading it as a direct allegory, why is it necessary to bring up a representation of a violent radical group working within an oppressed people? I mean it does so to disprove it. But is it necessary in the first place?

    Could Dawson have known where the world would be now? There were criticisms of Israel’s participation when she wrote it, so maybe this was supposed to be a critique of the EBU going under the radar (amidst the fireworks of Susan and the Rani) for those in the know.

    Broadly the message of the episode seems moral, even if the Doctor’s focus is on protecting Belinda rather than finding out what is going on with the activist plight. There is an inbuilt critique of the Doctor’s nearsightedness here which helps to sell this idea for me. Something distinctly lacking from Kerblam.

    I forget that ppl outside my bubble just don’t know about the Eurovision boycott. Like the gays and theys all seem to know, but then I talk to family or colleagues and they haven’t heard anything about it. Hopefully this episode causes people to research this topic, even if it’s just the Who fandom.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.