The Star Beast Review
There’s a moment, about halfway through the episode, where the Doctor observes something about a seemingly dead soldier. We don’t immediately see what, but it’s clear that it surprises the Doctor, and we watch him draw a conclusion and take on a new course of action. It’s an extremely small thing. But it’s tight, logical storytelling. And it’s followed up immediately by having the laser beams failing to affect the taxicab—a moment that’s subtly foregrounded specifically to get the audience to go “ooh, that looks a bit cheap actually” in amidst a scene that’s otherwise showing off that Disney+ money—become an actual plot point, a modern day “the man in a rubber suit is secretly a man in a rubber suit.” All of this in service of keeping the audience engaged and thinking through the premise as the episode navigates its showpiece reveal. It’s good, sharp writing, textbook both in its mastery of the basics and in how good an example it makes of what competence looks like.
Let’s leave it at that and move on to actually discussing the first new episode of Doctor Who in, what, six years?
It is, obviously, backward looking. I mean, of course it is. It’s the 60th Anniversary Special. It was going to be backward looking even before you factor in the return of Davies and company. This isn’t a criticism, and if you think it is then you need to unplug your brain from the hot takes competition that is Doctor Who discourse on social media—a phrase that’s frankly as dated as “DoctorDonna”—and remember how utterly ephemeral this two week bubble of neo-Tennant is and how very different a place Doctor Who fandom is going to be in just a month. The job description here is “remind people what they loved”—reawakening the pleasures of 2008. That’s clear from the direct-to-camera intro that all the advance reviews weirdly fixated on as if it’s particularly innovative. (It is, but the clever thing is juxtaposing those 4K shots of Tennant standing over a lushly colored space background and, subsequently, Donna on a laptop in a kitchen with the 480p flashback clips, subtly announcing progress even as they stoke up the fires of nostalgia.) The episode starts with thirty seconds of Rachel Talalay delightedly twirling the camera around David Tennant and then running him smack into a physical comedy bit with Catherine Tate. The hits keep coming: Rose, what x3, Donna missing a crashing spaceship, “your great great granddad,” and then cap it all off with a joke about David Tennant being old. (Added comedy—he was already thirty-five in 2006 when he first took the job.) If you had any love for the era in question—and the record plainly shows that I do—then you’re back in the saddle and loving it before he’s even gotten in the taxicab.
From here Davies plays it two ways at once. On the one hand he’s in deeply familiar territory on multiple levels. It’s not even that Davies does these giant comedy-action curtain raisers better than anyone. Nobody else even really does them except as imitations of what is as much his signature form as much as villainous bureaucrats are Holmes or timeline shenanigans are Moffat. Likewise, no one but him would ever attempt Beep the Meep, little yet in such a prominent spot. It’s not that it’s a bad idea—the central reveal was a stone cold classic of visual storytelling when Pat Mills and Dave Gibbons did it, and it had the entire room wheezing with joy here. It’s just that nobody but Russell T Davies has a brain whose shower thoughts are quite so frequently exhaustive lists of the most adaptable moments in Doctor Who spinoff media.
And then there’s the consecutive scenes in which we’re introduced to the mysterious new UNIT figure in a wheelchair and see Rose being bullied with her deadname. It’s not a coincidence we go straight from the Tennant and Tate nostalgia tour to this. It’s a thesis statement. Establish the past, then update it. Indeed, it’s a structural inevitability given the paratext (and ain’t that the sort of sentence you back my Patreon for). Given that this is the launch of a new era and not simply a nostalgia tour, whatever scene came first after the initial nostalgia hit was going to be read as “here’s what we’re doing now.” In which case the most striking thing is how confrontational it is. I don’t even need to fucking look at X to know how it’s playing, and I’m about as likely to bother doing so as Davies is. The episode opens with “here’s everything you love” and then immediately pivots to “and here’s everything you’re going to hate.” That’s its dramatic engine.
This is in places dicey. “Something a male-presenting Time Lord will never understand” is outright bathetic, though Davies’s style has always had a high bathos tolerance through its embrace of camp—the real problem with it is that it can accurately be described as “Davies’s The Doctor the Widow and the Wardrobe.” But that cringe has to be taken in concert with the fact that this is Davies taking a massive pile of Disney money and screaming “trans rights” on BBC One so loudly that Saudi Arabia won’t be able to edit it out. There’s something to be said—quite a lot really—for making your point. At the end of the day, the irony is that this isn’t for queer people.
What’s more instructive is the pronouns scene. In four lines—and contrast that with the nearly minute long bit about Wilf right before it—Davies accomplishes the necessary virtue signal, drops the quite funny “my chosen pronoun is the definite article. I am always the Meep” joke, then ups it with the at once funny, poignant, and emotionally revealing “Oh. I do that.” Yes, this is overtly progressive and making itself about those politics, but it’s also actually doing things with those politics. (See also Shirley’s “don’t make me the problem,” a bit of dialogue that feels vividly pulled from knowledge of actual disabled people.) This is telling a story for which “socially progressive” is one of several accurate descriptions. Anyone objecting to that while being perfectly fine with cop shows is just a fucking bigot and should be treated accordingly.
In which case there are two bits here that really matter. The first is, in fact, Shirley, who’s clearly forward-facing, a step too cool for school, and given the big hero moment with the wheelchair rockets. It’s the sort of introduction that means you don’t have to know too much about the set reports and announced returns for Season Fourteen One to know we’ll be seeing more of her, and it’s no accident that she’s the one who gets the scene where the Doctor grapples with the fact that he’s the Fourteenth and not the Tenth. And as an advertisement for the future she’s a compelling one—charismatic and with an interesting relationship with the Doctor. The woman who says “you wish” to the idea of waiting around her whole life for the Doctor but who’s hypercompetent and we love her anyway is not something Davies has written before. It’s frankly not something he would have written before—it’s notable how much more nuanced Sylvia is as well. As tea leaves go, it’s compelling.
And then of course there’s the TARDIS set, and the prolonged beat of Tennant and Tate ecstatically gawping at it. Again, we know that it’s not really theirs—they’re playing around in Gatwa’s iconography. But what a set to play in. And it’s given real weight. Talalay luxuriates in the space (that wide shot that ducks below the console and back up as Tennant wheels about the background is exquisite) before the “one more thing” reveal of the lights and a final ostentatious display of Disney+ money as they set the whole thing on fire just minutes after introducing it.
So yes. Tremendously fun, and if it’s flattered by the last few years, well, the next few years sure look pretty exciting so that’s pretty OK. Right now, it’s just nice to be looking forward to next week.
- OK, I know I said I wasn’t going to spend time ragging on Chibnall, but it’s very satisfying to read the lengthy scene of Tennant and Tate rattling off effortlessly consonant technobabble as Davies staring baffledly at the words “Ranskoor av Kolos” and going “how did this even happen?”
- Speaking of “how did this even happen,” Pat Mills and Dave Gibbons in the opening title sequence of a Doctor Who episode. What a world we live in.
- Let’s also have one more round of praise for Rachel Talalay, who does a magnificent job of delivering “the one of the specials that isn’t trying to be impressive” in the most quietly impressive way possible. This just plain looks phenomenal. The warm orange lighting rippling over a full and vibrant spectrum of colors, the magnificent use of space in that circular spaceship set, the way the big action sequence in the middle keeps upping the scale, first spectacularly detonating the house set then opening up into those massive panning drone shots. Over and over again she makes the episode’s biggest flexes look casual, so that they feel like setting the tone instead of like a massive blowout.
- A quietly great beat is Rose discovering the Meep and just rolling with it. Not only does it nicely excise some boring bits the story can’t handle—Donna’s the one who needs to be grappling with the existence of Martian ferrets, and wasting time on anyone else doing so detracts from that arc—it’s just a great way to instantly sell her character. Screen time is extremely precious in this—it moves with even more jaw-dropping efficiency than the original four page episodes. Getting the audience on-side with Rose in one move is necessary. (Relatedly, “she had lots of names at school. And I should know, I invented them” is secretly the best line of Donna Noble dialogue Davies has ever written.)
- The implication that being a Time Lord is a conscious decision is actually quite interesting, building in neat ways upon the formalization of the Time Lord/Shabogan distinction and, frankly, the relationship between “Time Lord” and “Timeless Child.” I’d quite like to see this line of thought followed up on, actually.
- The most unexpectedly nostalgic moment for me was the return of Flavia’s Theme. Sure, Gold is still Gold—he tramples all over the Doctor declaring that he’ll still have to fix Donna and Rose by laying in a triumphant crescendo too early. But the things he’s good at he’s very good at. And hey, who’s gonna complain about the music when the middle 8 is back.
- Speaking of which, the new opening credits are a lot of fun, using the classic tunnel to bookend the more expansive use of space. There’s a lot of expansive use of space here. I’ll bet the tone meeting was something like “bigger and better.”
- This marked only the third time I have ever been able to watch Doctor Who live upon its premiere, the previous two being the TV Movie and the cinema screening of Day of the Doctor. And gosh, it’s just plain nice to finally have that. Sure, it looks I’ll have to go back to the old dark arts for Unleashed (is that what it’s called?) and the In-Vision commentary, but it was still wonderful to get to experience transmission, and doubly so to know that’s quotidian now.
- Also got my first proper Yeti-in-a-Loo moment—Penn and I were in Camden Market so that he could buy a second bomber jacket from a little boutique vendor there just last week, and we giggled with genuine delight at seeing the gloriously trashy Cyberdog in Doctor Who. Better still, the original’s a K-9 story.
- I’ve got Sean Dillon and Ritesh Babu lined up for what looks like it’s going to be the Patreon-exclusive podcast, in which we’ll be having a lot of fun with the comics adaptation angle. We’re recording that on Monday, and I’m excited.
- As I finish this off the Patreon is still $45 shy of where I post this publicly. I expect what will happen is that I’ll post an announcement of that on the blog under the title “The Star Beast Review” and shortly thereafter edit the post to include this review. Either way, I’d like to very sincerely thank all of my Patrons, both the ones who have been with me since I had to frustratingly relaunch it earlier this year and the ones who stepped up over the last month to help close about half of the financial loss that caused. It’s Thanksgiving weekend here, and there’s little in life I’m more thankful for than all of you.
- In fact, just as a little Patreon exclusive I’ll go ahead and announce the title of the eventual Power of the Doctor post: [redacted]
- Which just leaves one little order of business.
Rankings
- The Star Beast
James Robert Crews Wylder
November 26, 2023 @ 12:20 am
I’m really amazed at how Tennant has pulled out a performance that really just… isn’t the Tenth Doctor? He’s put a lot of care and thought into how he’s playing this person who has been three other people in the meantime, and it shows. I like the 14th Doctor a lot more than the 10th, honestly. Genuinely bizarre how excited I am to see more of him now.
Aquanafrahudy
November 26, 2023 @ 1:17 pm
He’s actually explicitly said that he didn’t change his performance at all, and simply assumed that as he was older he’d play it differently. (Same goes for RTD)
Harlequin
November 27, 2023 @ 7:24 am
That comment’s going to age well 😉
Mike Rowe
November 27, 2023 @ 7:27 am
Unlike Dr Who which now that it has the standard/token Alphabet Person taking the reins,hopefully it’s death throes will be short and painless.
Daibhid C
November 27, 2023 @ 10:13 am
Yeah, Doctor Who’s been slowly dying ever since they put a gay guy in charge in 2005.
Sorry, did I say 2005? I meant 1963.
Homunculette
November 26, 2023 @ 1:21 am
Back in the Eruditorum Press comments for DW reviews, just like the good old days! Almost commented on Patreon before I read your note about commenting here.
Man this was fun. In its own way it’s as much of a nostalgia piece as the Tales of the Tardis vignettes are, with so much of the joy of this just being seeing Tate and Tennant et al onscreen again. But it does still feel fresh and alive – Yasmin Finney steals the show here I’d say, and Davies is visibly reveling in the money he has to throw at the wall with the sonic screwdriver’s new drawing things in the air capabilities.
The ending on the whole is a little too classic Davies for me. I rolled my eyes a little at the streets literally closing back up after the dagger drive was reversed. Explicitly pro-trans gender essentialism is maybe better than not explicitly pro-trans gender essentialism I guess but the male presenting time lord moment is deeply weird! Doesn’t help that Davies used language that vividly recalls tumblr’s famous ban on “female-presenting nipples.”
On the whole I loved it though – amazing how much better this is than literally anything in the past 5 years, even the bits I’m fond of. I’m really interested to see how Tennant’s performance develops too. I do really get the sense he’s playing 14 as a character with life experience far beyond 10’s, which is extremely interesting.
Kate Orman
November 26, 2023 @ 2:15 am
“Something a male-presenting Time Lord will never understand” made me think of Moffat’s moments of gender essentialism. OTOH, it takes place in a context where male, female, and non-binary are all crucial to saving the day, working together. In fact, in this story, all sorts of human beings are necessary. Oh, I hope such a simple image of the everyday real world is causing spontaneous human combustion all over the place.
Lance Parkin
November 26, 2023 @ 10:04 am
I saw it as RTD saying the grammar of Doctor Who was inadequate to the task he’d set the show.
This cishet male thinks CC was right not to make Jodie’s Dr a trans narrative. Mainly because, shit, if he has personal experience of dyspraxia and made that out of it, then how about he keeps away from trans rights?
The end of The Star Beast is Ace realising the black and white pawns team up. It’s also the exact opposite of Donna screaming at the Dr not to erase her memories.
(I like that the absolute core of horror and identity here is ‘not knowing about Dr Who’)
But this is RTD being a sly bastard and using 2008 action figures to retell a 1980 story as a Trojan Horse for the culture war. The Trojan Horse, let’s remember, wasn’t part ‘of the war’, it was what ended the seemingly endless struggle, a total victory, and the start of ten years of decent monsters, a complex hero, and some freaky witch sex.
Disney just gave Doctor Who a zillion dollars to say trans people are magic and wheelchairs are weapons. There was a culture war, and we won.
Ziggy
November 26, 2023 @ 6:44 pm
I see fans started complaining if Donna could just let it go why didn’t she do it last time so that memory wipe and deprivation of agency point has largely not sunk in. I would be curious to see how RTD2 era could materially change viewers’ perception a little more fundamentally. Anyway seeing you two at the comment section is the soooo cool
Yuu
December 1, 2023 @ 2:50 pm
It does feel like a Moffat moment, however Moffat’s similar remarks were usually off-hand, eg. “Dear Lord, how do you cope with all that ego?” line in Hell Bent. They were pretty inconsequential and can certainly be classified as one-liner jokes, heritages from his Coupling days. Here, it has narrative consequences, essentially solving one of the problems and saving multiple characters. Even though Moffat had got his fair share of backlash for those jokes, I don’t suppose he’d ever go to such lengths to make an actual narrative step out of them.
Anthony Bernacchi
November 26, 2023 @ 4:59 am
First time commenter here. With regard to the comics adaptation aspect, I thought it was a shame that Rose didn’t tell Fudge that watching sci-fi rots the brain. Also, was the Doctor’s comment in “Destination: Skaro” about changing timelines and canon partly intended to foreshadow the original “Star Beast” and its follow-ups (e.g. “Star Beast II” and “The Ratings War”) seemingly being written out of continuity?
Sylvia Noble has one of the most remarkable character arcs in Doctor Who — she’s come a long way from her origin as a one-off annoying mother in “The Runaway Bride”.
I can foresee a strain of criticism that says there was too much reliance on violent action sequences due to having all that Disney money to spend. I’ll have to rewatch the special to see if I agree.
Scurra
November 26, 2023 @ 6:07 am
Yes, Sylvia got a surprisingly amount of good stuff here, considering how minor a character she still is. But RTD does now seem to care a lot more about his ‘NPCs’ (and making it perfectly clear that nobody is an NPC; everybody is a ‘main character’) and little things all create the right atmosphere.
Anyway, I still think it was about twenty minutes too long (or maybe forty minutes too short, in order for the Meep stuff to pay off properly) but set against that was the inescapable fact that most of the ‘filler’ scenes were so good, e.g. the infodump from Sean in the taxi that just worked, or the extensive sequence showing off the ‘toys’ that Rose made.
Annie j
November 26, 2023 @ 6:35 am
I really hope Shirley gets to travel with the doctor at some point, Having the first companion in a wheelchair on the main show would really be something to see.
Of course, there would be challenges in how to approach the stories, particularly those said in the past, but I think the benefits of doing it would certainly outweigh the disadvantages.
Doctor Memory
November 27, 2023 @ 10:53 am
I suspect that the ramps in the new control room set are a strong hint about that.
Anton B
November 26, 2023 @ 10:39 am
‘The Star Beast’ was one of those Doctor Who eye candy ‘romp’ episodes wasn’t it? Fast paced, flashy but with a crunchy social awareness centre. It’s beating hearts sending a double message we can be proud of – that it’s possible to be both inclusive and extraordinary at the same time. ‘Binary’ indeed.
I can’t help feeling it was an odd way to launch a “new viewers start here” reboot though. Heavy on the “previously…” with a good deal of well paced exposition, but exposition nonetheless, relying on the viewer knowing and caring who this skinny know-all in a suit with alien tech and a motor mouth is. Perhaps the idea was to portray the central mystery, the “doctor who?” of Doctor Who via an overwhelming info dump, hoping the sheer volume of back story would entice and intrigue. Compare with RTD’s previous introductory story, ‘ Rose’, where the inference that the Doctor had a past was introduced gradually.
I’d be intrigued to know what new-to-Who Disney+ viewers made of it. I suspect it won’t really impact until future Ncuti Gatwa fans return view it after his first season.
Also… We need to see Shirley in the Tardis, scooting around those new swooping ramps and I’m guessing it’ll happen in Gatwa’s era.
The inevitable ‘Doctor visits Wilf’ scene (Cribbin’s last) is gonna be a tear jerker isn’t it?
Any bets on what Tennant’s final regeneration speech is gonna be? My money’s on “It’s time to go!” .
Nick R
November 26, 2023 @ 1:22 pm
@Anton B – “Perhaps the idea was to portray the central mystery, the “doctor who?” of Doctor Who via an overwhelming info dump, hoping the sheer volume of back story would entice and intrigue.”
Didn’t the 1996 TV movie attempt to do something like that? A voiceover that namedrops Skaro, the Master, Gallifrey, and 13 lives in quick succession, and hopes that newcomers find it intriguing instead of off-putting.
Doctor Memory
November 26, 2023 @ 2:08 pm
Anton— I watched this with my extended family and I’m sad (but absolutely not surprised) to say that the relatives who were not previous watchers of the show were absolutely baffled by it. 30 seconds of David Tennant declaiming portentously to the camera was to put it mildly not enough to sell them on the idea that they should care about (or even really understand) what had happened to Donna Noble. And absent having an obsessive fan (me) there to explain that Beep the Meep had come first, they would have come out of it thinking that he’d been an obvious mashup of E.T. and the mogwai from Gremlins.
I basically enjoyed it on its own merits, and I’m glad to see any story where the titular main character is actually a protagonist taking action in the narrative rather than standing around having the plot explained to her at length by other characters. But this was a weird series of choices by Davies, who is absolutely capable of writing an episode that functions as an on-ramp for new fans (by demonstration, “Rose” exists) but who seemed to be actively avoiding doing so at every moment here.
David H
November 26, 2023 @ 4:37 pm
Disney didn’t promote these specials at all. They are basically airing them as a contractual obligation. This ain’t the onramp for new viewers. That will be Season 1 with Ncuti and Millie in the lead.
Elizabeth Sandifer
November 26, 2023 @ 4:39 pm
This is absolutely an episode best understood in terms of the BBC, as opposed to Disney+.
The balance there is going to be interesting
Doctor Memory
November 26, 2023 @ 4:48 pm
I’m not even sure what counts as “promotion” in the streaming era? At least on my AppleTV box, the special was part of the rotating top banner, and the link to it was prominently placed in the “New on Disney+” icon row. The usual stenography sites (avclub, bleedingcool, etc) mentioned it. Our host’s point that this is an episode better seen in terms of obligation to the BBC than to their newer audience is well taken, but I think a nontrivial number of people are going to have this be their first encounter with the show.
Elizabeth Sandifer
November 26, 2023 @ 4:50 pm
Idk I’m just not that worried about the casual fan on the platform whose headliners are Star Wars and the MCU
David H
November 26, 2023 @ 8:32 pm
Promotion, in terms of Disney+ means a clip at the top of every single youtube video you watch. It means interviews on morning chat shows (which they did, with Ncuti, when the Disney deal was first announced). There being a banner on the top of the site for a day or two with no other context is not Disney promotion.
All that is what sells the show to a new audience. And all that is being saved for Ncuti (whose every single costume change they have Xeeted over the past year, while ignoring the Tennant specials completely until about a month ago.
Camestros Felapton
November 28, 2023 @ 5:23 pm
It was unfindable on Disney+ in Australia until last week (or at least I couldn’t find it). It only appeared in a search on “Doctor Who” late last week and otherwise was invisible. The main confirmation I had that it was actually going to be shown in Australia on Disney+ (other than by implication) was ironically an article by the ABC.
Camestros Felapton
November 28, 2023 @ 6:32 pm
The episode is being advertised on the banner-thing of the Disney+ home screen now
magpiesovereign
November 26, 2023 @ 11:22 am
You mentioned efficiency, and I think that was what impressed me most last night. Davies is very, very good at solving more than one problem with a single scene, eg. the taxi ride with Shaun which feels effortless but is a really smart piece of connective tissue. It introduces us to Shaun (which it’s easy to forget still basically needed doing), gets the Doctor to the steelworks, sets up the lottery thread, and packs in a few jokes. It seems so trivial, but when the Doctor later asks Shaun ‘Where’s your car?’ (‘Five doors down.’), I got a little jolt from realising, ‘Oh yeah, we’ve seen his car; it’s the taxi!’. Just the click-click-click of a story running smoothly at full speed. I don’t love all his habits, but Davies is a tremendously competent TV writer.
A little speculation (please chastise me if this is frowned upon here):
– The Meep conspicuously teases ‘the Boss’, which could link into the Toymaker in a few weeks time, but I feel that it’s more likely to reference a Time Lord with the whole ‘two hearts’ business, and will come back into play in a season or two. The obvious answer is the Master, since ‘Boss’ is close enough an exact synonym, but I honestly think it’s going to be the Rani this time. Seriously.
– Am I the only one who felt like Donna complaining about the ‘man with a goatee’ was a ‘woman in the shop’ style piece of foreshadowing? Again, goatees invoke the Master, but it’s possible that Neil Patrick Harris is just going to turn up in two weeks with a temporary goatee? Or more likely it’s just a throwaway peice of dialogue.
– Honestly, what is going on with ‘Wild Blue Yonder?’ They’ve done a very good job of keeping quiet any details on this episode. Some cast members have been ‘redacted’, so smart money is probably on a few notable guest stars, but I find myself feeling far more interested in ‘very good Doctor Who’ than ‘a celebration of Doctor Who’ right now. The two aren’t mutually exclusive I suppose.
Aquanafrahudy
November 26, 2023 @ 1:29 pm
Rani rights are… Complicated.
(And people have been saying that for the last twenty years)
And note Tennant has said that he still doesn’t know who the Boss is, to which Collinson replied that he would find out when he watched Gatwa’s era, implying it won’t be explained for a while yet. Could be the Master, I suppose, but I doubt RTD will want to bring them back so soon. They’ve been kind of overused.
On the episode, I really liked it. It was absolutely a massively fun episode. The end bit was very much Davies trying to be feminist and ending up somewhere in the region of biological essentialism, but apart from that single line (which wasn’t written very well and was very cringe) it was great. Lovely to see some trans rep, if disheartening to see the world’s reaction to it.
magpiesovereign
November 26, 2023 @ 5:45 pm
Warning for spoilers, but all things officially announced by the BBC.
I really suspect that Indira Varma’s character next year is going to turn out to be the Rani. She’s been announced as the Duchess, and it seems to me like casting an actress with Indian heritage and having her use an equivalent English title is a good way to take the ick out of a white woman using the title ‘Rani’ in the past. I personally suspect that the team can get the rights to the character if they need to (she was mentioned in the final ‘Tales of the Tardis’ episode), but I could totally be wrong; I wouldn’t have predicted the Unearthly Child fiasco! Even if they can’t, it’s not impossible that the character would be plainly the Rani but only ever called the Duchess, pulling the Faction Paradox move in reverse. We know that Mel is back next year, who obviously has met the Rani before, and on top of the Tales of the Tardis mention I have heard that a recent Dr. Who annual was talking about causes of regeneration, and included the 6th -> 7th as the only classic era example, citing the Rani as the cause. It just rings true to me right now that they’re revisiting the character.
I think we’re in a totally different media landscape re: continuity references than we were in 2005, and people get excited about things ‘coming back’ even if it’s not something they were personally invested in. Regardless of the quality of the Rani as a character (and I feel ‘amoral scientist’ is a pretty good starting point for a villain), there comes a point where something has been the subject of enough fan speculation that it actually becomes quite an appealing idea. And a nice way to give the Master a break for a few years while including a somewhat similar character.
Snowmonk
November 26, 2023 @ 3:31 pm
In terms of who The Boss could be (and in keeping with the theme of comics adaptations), the most gloriously silly answer would be Dogbolter!
Elizabeth Sandifer
November 26, 2023 @ 3:32 pm
Susan as Big Bad or gtfo
Aquanafrahudy
November 26, 2023 @ 3:55 pm
It’s obviously Faction Paradox.
It’s always Faction Paradox
Sean Dillon
November 26, 2023 @ 3:58 pm
That, or the Rani.
Aquanafrahudy
November 26, 2023 @ 3:59 pm
It seems Faction Paradox have recruited Susan.
Aquanafrahudy
November 26, 2023 @ 4:00 pm
Susan is the Rani.
BG Hilton
November 26, 2023 @ 6:17 pm
My money is on it literally being BOSS from the Green Death.
Kate Orman
November 26, 2023 @ 9:08 pm
“I’m back, zing-boom!”
George Lock
November 27, 2023 @ 9:33 am
I was literally just about to comment that myself!
BG Hilton
November 28, 2023 @ 11:53 pm
I think BOSS should be due for a comeback. An alleged “evil supercomputer” which is, in practice, just a very annoying manager? Very 2023.
BG Hilton
November 28, 2023 @ 11:57 pm
BOSS is due a comeback, probably as some sort of ‘efficiency app’.
BG Hilton
November 29, 2023 @ 12:00 am
BOSS is due a comeback, possibly in the form of a malevolent productivity app.
BG Hilton
November 29, 2023 @ 12:02 am
Sorry, I seem to have posted multiple variants of the same weak joke. Please delete any or all of them.
Harlequin
November 27, 2023 @ 11:18 am
I had to look up Dogbolter, at first confusing him with Dogwelder from the ‘Hitman’ comics then wondering if one might have inspired the other. Then I discovered that both were drawn by Steve Dillon.
Ken Finlayson
November 29, 2023 @ 3:12 pm
My money’s on the Master of the Land of Fiction.
Aylwin
November 27, 2023 @ 10:49 am
Regarding villain foreshadowing, it has also been remarked that the repeated references to the mystery woman in the UAE (Donna seems a little hazy on exactly where) who buys Rose’s toys seem highly suspicious.
dmd
November 26, 2023 @ 12:08 pm
Was I the only one who got tired real fast of Davies being extra-Davies? This felt like all of his bad habits glommed together and rolled down an entertaining but forgettable hill. Miles better than the last three years of course. But maybe I’ve been spoiled by the heights of the Moffat era (and forgetting the lows).
There were three (3!) whole cringe moments of “Diversity is my Superpower” bathos: My wheelchair has rockets (which is not as progressive as they think it is), binary/nonbinary (which i audibly groaned at), and the whole male-presenting bit. So Rose was essentialized twice in two different ways. First as nonbinary (the idea there is some physical difference in Rose’s gender expression that the time lord energy recognizes, which is maybe the first ever nonbinary essentialism? Hooray?) and then again as part of woman-power. I can imagine Yasmin reading this script and asking what 60-year-old cis man wrote this and how long until the check clears.
I’m just hoping this is the throat-clearing we get as RTD2 ramps up towards something new and different.
Elizabeth Sandifer
November 26, 2023 @ 12:42 pm
Realistically, I expect that Finney was wholly aware of the weight of doing this on BBC One in a massively high profile slot, that she wasn’t going to get a casting call specifically for a mixed race trans femme Londoner role again any time soon, and that sometimes we have to do shit that’s aimed at cis people.
Ziggy
November 26, 2023 @ 6:58 pm
Earnest question from a cisgender male, is the “male presenting” line this bad? If we presume Time Lords are non-binary entity, which for this show’s history thus far they are very much not (Doctor kept saying I’m woman now, I’m a man again, and yes it contradicts what 12th once said), then this line isn’t applicable to the doctor really; but otherwise, if we treat 14th as a male, very much to his own admission, then in the non-non-binary context this is just a gender stereotype joke aiming at the gender that wields dominant societal power right? I would think gender/racial essentialism in practice refers mostly to the prejudice against the disadvantaged side?
Ziggy
November 26, 2023 @ 7:03 pm
So the “male presenting” line is only essentializing one gender, the (cis-)male and Rose seeing beyond that isn’t necessarily a “woman power” but just “not-cis-male” power right? I agree all these lines are pretty awkward and boomer-esque cop-out, but I’m not necessarily buying that this is a big gender essentialism problem just like we don’t make a big deal out of what they call “reverse sexism/racism”?
Kate Orman
November 26, 2023 @ 9:05 pm
At its worst, the “women are sensible and men are dum-dums” thing lets men be irresponsible while women clean up the mess. Think “boys will be boys”.
Josh McNamee
November 28, 2023 @ 4:51 am
It does suggest that the two things Russell has held over from the Moffat era are Rachel Talalay and the big book of “Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus” jokes.
Kate Orman
November 28, 2023 @ 5:36 am
Let us hope it was merely a moment of Awkwardness.
Elizabeth Sandifer
November 28, 2023 @ 1:02 pm
The problem is that 60% of the time “women are sensible and men are dum-dums” is that, and 40% of the time it’s a scorching deconstruction of masculinity by someone who should probably look into informed consent HRT. Worse, the only ones where you can be sure which is which are the ones who actually transition.
Ziggy
November 26, 2023 @ 8:55 pm
Just to add on…I reckon the reason people gripe about this line has to be they assume the Doctor is by definition non-binary? Like oh they’ve transitioned (however many times) now so they must have understood? So saying the “male presenting” doctor won’t understand would be equivalent of saying a male-looking trans person wouldn’t understand? I guess I just don’t see Time Lord society as a whole being very progressive anyway (as we were all shown during classic series) so here 14th is just a stereotypical male is in keeping with all the other self-assuming running gags of the episode and Donna’s usual attitudes towards the doctor.
Ziggy
November 26, 2023 @ 9:17 pm
Damn I can’t delete comments here right… I think I now understand that “male presenting” or “masculine presenting” is a sort of term in trans community? I had no idea as a cis dude that’s a thing so by saying “male presenting time lord” they are incorporating implicit trans language already right…
Aristide Twain
November 28, 2023 @ 9:50 am
Male-“presenting” is not the same thing as “transmasculine”; it specifically refers to someone whose inner experience of gender is not necessarily or exclusively male, but who chooses to present — to present themselves, socially — as male. The very definition of the term implies one isn’t actually limited by a specifically male (or specifically-anything) perspective, but merely outwardly looking like a man right now. The idea that a “male-presenting” non-binary person would not understand something due to their blinkered male perspective is thus a contradiction in terms.
Corey Klemow
November 26, 2023 @ 1:45 pm
[Just FYI in case other people aren’t seeing this, but this website’s commenting software is currently exposing the EMail of the most recent commenter by pre-filling the name/email/website field in the comment box with their information. Dunno whether that means spambots can harvest it, so I’m using a secondary EMail for this post. I tried to use a throwaway temp email, but the website ate my post and it didn’t appear.
Anyway…]
This cis guy was as gobsmacked at the surprise Moffat-esque gender essentialism as the rest of you, which I don’t think we’ve seen from Davies before… but so much else about the way the episode handled trans issues seemed so lovely and thoughtful and well-judged, and I found the episode to be so joyous overall, that I decided to chalk that line up to just Donna being Donna and… well, let it go, to phrase a coin.
The reversal of the cracks in the street got a vocal “oh, come ON!” out of me, but with a smile and a laugh – a big undercurrent of awwwww-that’s-our-RTD. The chase scene seemed to me to go on just a bit too long. Fudge’s role was so cut down the character almost might as well just not have been there. And other than the aforementioned gender-essentialist clunkiness, that’s about all I found fault with. Doctor Who is largely back on form and honestly, RTD’s intros and specials were always extra-fizzy and logic-light; it’s all part of the nostalgia tour even as we point towards the future.
(Also: calling it now – Mel will be working for UNIT as a computer expert. Basing this on the fact that RTD said the Chibnall companion-gathering scene from “Power of the Doctor” coincidentally tied in with something he wanted to do, plus the sheer number of recurring characters for what will be an 8-episode-plus-a-Christmas-special season – Kate, Shirley, Mel and Rose, all of whom are based in modern-day London.)
Daibhid C
November 27, 2023 @ 10:25 am
I commented in my own Dreamwidth review … well, I say review, vague blethering … that I had exactly the same reaction to the streets healing up as you did.
Uz
November 26, 2023 @ 11:30 pm
it’s strange watching an episode of television you know (or hope) is going to age terribly one day, by which time you’ll cringe watching it and have to remind yourself how necessary it was
Aylwin
November 27, 2023 @ 10:16 am
Fourth “What?!” unlocked!
Aylwin
November 27, 2023 @ 10:24 am
Oh wait no, there were four in Doomsday Confusticate it!
Kaan Vural
November 27, 2023 @ 12:16 pm
To say it’s the best episode in years is a pretty low bar, but I was smiling through most of it. I’ve never been on the same page as Davies as far as how broad he pitches his specials. Admittedly he’s doing it to keep seats warm for the main event, but I’m not going to be that moved either way by what is ultimately inessential Who.
It’s interesting to watch how the money seems to have altered the balances of things. The level of choreographed action here is frankly eye-popping for Doctor Who and yet it’s in service of a story that’s almost devoid of the kind of portent and operatics Davies would usually marry it to. The TARDIS interior is vast, but after the lap around the gantries the scene ditches it in favor of the same handful of square meters around the console, just with a lot more emptiness in the back. You could read it as a mission statement about keeping it small in spite of the windfall, or you could read it as Davies still searching for a new tonal balance with an expanded budget.
If I had a genuine annoyance it’s with the characterization, which is a bit surprising even given that it’s a special. Neither Donna nor Rose had inner conflicts I found compelling – Donna’s amnesia is played up but it’s just her waiting for a plot to happen, and Rose is given the “I’m finally who I am” bit at the end but I never got the impression she had a problem with her own identity. Tennant’s great, of course, but if there’s anything off in the performance it’s that I don’t really know what to measure him against – as the Tenth Doctor the Time War is always present to give him context, but without that the Fourteenth feels a little parodic in spite of it being fairly toned-down from the manic heights of the late noughties.
Still, it’s a relief to watch an episode knowing that I’ll look forward to watching it again, which has been a rarity in recent years.
Kate Orman
November 27, 2023 @ 6:15 pm
I wondered if Rose’s earlier dialogue about feeling like she was from another planet and “different” was meant to do double duty: she is both trans and partly Time Lord, partly alien. With the alien part let go, she feels like herself. Hmm. I’m not sure how to feel about the idea that Rose is trans because of the metacrisis and not due to normal human variety. Is that what the story implies?
Kate Orman
November 27, 2023 @ 6:22 pm
… thinking about it, perhaps that’s similar to the unshackled fun of al wheelchair users having weapons in their wheelchairs!
Aristide Twain
November 28, 2023 @ 9:53 am
I think the fact that she feels more like “actual self” after letting go of the Gallifreyan essence is specifically meant to neutralise the “she’s trans because of Great Houses pixie-dust” reading. Whether it succeeds is another question.
Kate Orman
November 27, 2023 @ 6:20 pm
… thinking about it, perhaps that’s similar to the unshackled fun of al wheelchair users having weapons in their wheelchairs!
Ross
November 27, 2023 @ 9:07 pm
I… Didn’t like the pacing? But I’m not sure if there’s something wrong with the pacing objectively or if I’m still recovering from the “Just shove more stuff in. Who cares if it adds up to anything. More STUFF, ALWAYS” pacing of the Chibnall era. Really liked the later parts, basically from the “trial” scene onward, but it felt like a lot of “not actually getting on with it” happened to get there. That time could have been spent giving us more with Rose or Shirley (I found Rose much cooler in her scenes without the Meep than reacting to the Meep, which obviously rely on her being completely taken in by the shtick).
One thing I’m slightly fascinated by is the decision to have Ruth Madeley very ostentatiously cross her legs front-and-center on camera. I kinda wonder if that was deliberate bait to tempt critics to do exactly what assholes out in the wild do if they see a wheelchair-user who has some use of their legs, and accuse someone who’s extremely well-known as having spina bifida of “faking it”.
Kate Orman
November 28, 2023 @ 4:42 pm
Someone on ex-Twitter complained about the leg-crossing and had their bottom handed to them. 🙂 More than a trap for the foolish, I suspect it’s foreshadowing, and we will see Shirley briefly leave the wheelchair when necessary. Perhaps preventing many more stupid confrontations in the supermarket etc
Ziggy
November 28, 2023 @ 4:51 pm
I think the condition actress Ruth Madeley suffers is called Spina bifida, which requires wheelchair, yet it’s not because of specifically leg problems, so she can cross legs just fine, yet she can’t walk outright. It certainly feels like something they can go more depth into in the Unleased.
Ziggy
November 28, 2023 @ 4:54 pm
oops replied too fast saw this was already mentioned above sorry…
Steven Bailey
November 28, 2023 @ 7:03 am
Interesting points raised, as always!
For me, the extended laser-fight sequence summed this one up; it was competent, punchy, and it will please the target audience with aplomb. However, it also comes with a questionable lack of both substance and focus.
My core question is the most basic one you can ask: who’s story is this?
Is “The Star Beast” the story of Donna coming back into the light? Is it the story of The Doctor confronting an unforeseen destiny? Is it the story of Rose having her life blown apart so she can find herself? I don’t think the script has a confident answer; the lasers are firing away, but not towards a common target. And listen, the most boring part of a chess game is setting up all the pieces, but it still has to be done; RTD deserves credit for getting so all these vintage story beats fired up again and feeling youthfully frantic as he does so. Still, when Resolution Time hits (always a creaky moment with Russell), that lack of emotional focus becomes apparent.
RTD skips thinking of an actual plot resolution as per usual (the ruptures in the earth sellotape themselves back, of course), and, as per usual, focuses on the emotional resolutions instead. But without the narrative focus to build up to one, we get three of them half-landing in succession.
Donna’s return is fine, but does it hit with the emotional force you’d truly hope for? It feels to me almost perfunctory, complete with your complimentary Tennant-shouty-moment; an expected beat struck with passing competence, conjuring all of what you’d expect but little of what you’d dream of. Then we get Rose. And… where to start? Troubling implications of sci-fi transness, a fifteen-year-plot resolved with a cheap gender joke, and a Hallmark Card line about finding herself when she never seemed to have any issue with that in the first place.
And all this last-minute clumsiness, for me, for one reason: RTD wanted to centre the trans issues, but he didn’t want to centre the trans character. Rose is the one person here to bond with the Meep in innocent form, and then we get no reaction at all from her when the Meep reveals itself to be a monster – think of that! A monster reveals it’s identity to be different than what everyone thought it was, but in a twisted manner, and our trans protagonist has no thematic or emotional echo from that whatsoever. Rose has a mother who is in mortal peril the entire episode, and she is never even told about it; she never feels an inch of that danger!
For me, what “The Star Beast” needs is to be Rose Noble’s story. Start with her, build her character; have the Meep crash in her shed, and bond with her. Have her be the first one to meet the Doctor. Have her be the one to learn about the danger her mother is in – not Shirley, who doesn’t even know Donna. Have her be the one to feel most betrayed by the Meep’s change, have her be the one to save the day and help Donna to return with full glory. Centering her keeps the story accessible for new viewers and helps a resolution land with real force. And for God’s sake, have her fly off with The Doctor at the end! She just stands there waving her middle-aged mum off! So side-lined!
General thoughts:
Jaqueline King, take a bow. Her performance was a show-stealer.
The Meep was fantastic camp fun.
I like the new Screwdriver powers! Kids will have fun miming them at lunch-break.
The TARDIS is huge, but a little sterile. I hope Ncuti gets to add more homely touches.
Overall: 6.5/10. A fun, punchy romp that covers up an unfocused narrative with rote camp energy.
Doctor Memory
November 28, 2023 @ 10:30 am
Bravo. This sums up a lot of my reservations about this episode more or less perfectly.
Elizabeth Sandifer
November 28, 2023 @ 12:59 pm
I think treating the cracks in the road as “the plot” is strained. The plot is the Meep destructively escaping. The cracks in the road are just Davies going with an absurdly operatic visual for “the Meep’s triumph is at hand.” It’s nothing more than a Disney-budget progress bar. Absolutely nothing prior had been setting up the plot as being about the intricacies of concrete repair. If your expectations are that this is the plot, that’s something you’re bringing to the episode, not something the episode is setting up.
As for the focus being on Rose, I mean… we’ve got two more hours of this. The third one is going to have the Toymaker as the villain and be set back on Earth. I suspect that Donna’s toy-making daughter is going to be pretty central.
Aquanafrahudy
November 28, 2023 @ 3:10 pm
Well, yes, but other episodes focusing on the character that this episode ought to have been focusing on isn’t exactly going to solve the problem of the lack of focus in the episode now, is it?
Of course you are a venerable media critic who has written many thousands of words on this topic, and is one of the respected and derided individuals in the field, you’re probably seeing things that I’m not.
Caveat: I still absolutely adored the episode, but do think Bailey made some interesting and thought-provoking points, which are by no means a deal-breaker, but certainly ideas as to how it could have been better than it was.
BG Hilton
November 28, 2023 @ 11:48 pm
I might be alone in loving the bit with the cracks vanishing. My wife didn’t get why I laughed and yelled ‘Uncle Rusty’s baaack!’ when it happened.
Steven Bailey
November 29, 2023 @ 9:52 pm
I’m using “plot” here simply as “the physical events taking place”, in contrast to “story” as “the emotional threads underlying/causing them”. Of course, no-one is going to describe The Star Beast as “that one where the Earth cracks apart”, but nonetheless that moment is the climax of the plot-stakes; the moment where the wider plot reaches a point that demands real resolution. And the resolution we get is the kind of thing you might expect an off-kilter drunkard at a bus-stop at three in the morning to suggest. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t care about it enough to affect my enjoyment, but it does snap the nostalgia-goggles off towards the way Davies writes sci-fi and the kind of thing we can expect to be reacquainted with over the next few years.
And I agree, Rose will return! My point isn’t that she’s going to be irrelevant and unheard of after this narrative, but rather that this narrative would have played better with her being firmly the audience surrogate and the main emotional thread underlining it. I think it would have held things together a little more closely, given the Metacrisis resolution more weight, and made everything feel much more fresh for new viewers. I mentioned how it gives much more theme and emotional weight to the Meep’s transformation, but it also allows you a nice thematic echo as Rose would uncover TWO hidden identities in the plot: her pet alien in the shed is a monster, and her mother is a time-travelling hero!
That said, it would have been bold to not put the focus right on TENNANT AND TATE ARE BACK. LOOK AT ‘EM. THEY’RE COCKNEY. AND BACK. And maybe there I’m revealing my hidden feelings that I’m just not that arsed about them being back and would happily swap their return for a guaranteed banger for Ncuti’s debut.
Scurra
November 28, 2023 @ 6:34 pm
Here I disagree. The more I think about it, the more I see that part as a story about two sets of mothers and daughters, and learning to let go. This is most obvious in Donna’s storyline: overprotective at the start (saying she will call the mother of the kid who deadnames Rose) and then realising that her daughter has grown up, but it’s also true with Sylvia: overprotective (because she’s terrified that the Doctor will ‘kill’ Donna if they re-engage) and then realising that she too could let her daughter go.
And Rose Noble only fits into that narrative as a daughter, not as a mother, and she was not really an independent character at any point (well, at least not until her mother chose to accept her fate.)
Steven Bailey
November 29, 2023 @ 10:01 pm
Oh, that’s a lovely parallel, there.
I would also have been fine with that being the emotional focus, but I still feel the plot is begging to wrap itself around Rose as a POV character: she finds the alien, saves the day, etc. Maybe both would have been possible! I do like the reading of the episode as “mothers letting go”, although perhaps there’s a fly in the ointment in that you argue both of them would be perfectly valid NOT to let go: Sylvia was correct that Donna needed to be protected from seeing the Doctor, and she’d be justified not to want to see her fly off into peril again. And Donna can ring up as many bullies’ mums as she likes, for me!
I don’t know. I think we could jam the pieces together in a few ways, but the bottom line is that The Star Beast had “get Tennant and Tate on those telly screens” as the main priority, and – for the sake of Doctor Who – that’s probably smart. I just think a better story could have been told if “let’s focus this narrative on the perspective of our brand-new character” had been the objective instead.
John Binns
December 1, 2023 @ 11:31 am
Very good review. My only extra observation is that the original Star Beast was very much Sharon’s story, and a lot of the good stuff from that has been lost. I still have a visceral reaction to that frame where she reacts to the Meep reveal: “I hate you! You’re horrible!”
Ken Finlayson
November 29, 2023 @ 3:11 pm
How delihgtful that Russell T. Davies has brought Doctor Who back from the dead a second time. I thought this was a glorious romp, and if it wasn’t much developed from the sort of story we’d have seen with the original Donna and 10th Doctor, that’s to be expected. Anniversary stories are cosy Who-as-you-remember-it; a little treat for the fans. The Star Beast is no more trying to draw in new viewers than the Day of the Doctor is. But I am excited to see how Davies does it for the start of the Gatwa era.
Nick Walters
November 30, 2023 @ 11:00 am
What strikes me about this is how much it does to bring audiences together. Those who remember the comic strip will know that those DWW strips were loads better than TV Who at the time: City of the Damned, Iron Legion, Dogs of Doom, Tides of Time, Voyager – all absolute classics (though I don’t want or expect to see these adapted). The Star Beast is as RTD says perfect Who, a blend of comedy and action set in your back yard. (Yeti on bog ahoy). Then the people who loved Tennant and Tate and are tuning in (what a strange expression) out of nostalgia. The genera public, who either know it is Dr Who’s 60th and are watching because of that, or have switched on for Strictly and are caught up in the madness. And new younger fans who will identify with Rose. And probably several other cohorts I’ve missed. It wasn’t a perfect episode but is probably the best ‘gateway drug’ we’ve ever had.
Ross
December 7, 2023 @ 9:46 pm
Belatedly, I want to reflect a moment on how Shaun Temple shows RTD’s growth since we last checked in. Like, he serves the storytelling role of “Companion’s Comic Relief Family Member” that we’re familiar with, but there’s none of the cruelty that we had when we started out with Jackie Tyler. He’s just a good guy. It’s funny just how willing he is to just roll with it no matter what comes at him, but this doesn’t make him seem goofy or foolish. He’s just his wife and daughter’s biggest cheerleader, happy with his lot in life, and willing to take what comes. It’s… Kind. It’s just kind. It makes me aware of how much in the past the “funny” characters were based around the writer asking “Okay but who is it socially acceptable for me to mock?”, but here in 2023, RTD was able to find a different way.