Freelance Subversion: Time Bandits
With Life of Brian out of the way, Terry Gilliam had partially unshackled himself from Monty Python. He was unable to bring his masterpiece Brazil to the big screen, but he was free to focus on his own movies. He’ll come back to Python in 1983 for The Meaning of Life, which is the movie most influenced by the Pythons’ solo careers, but from now on, he’ll be an artist in his own right rather than just the Monty Python cartoonist. Gilliam is Python’s Peter Gabriel, the member who goes off and does weird, antagonistic art for an audience who knows his new stuff better than his Python work (granted, he splits Peter Gabriel duties with the equally wayward John Cleese). When he does return to Python, it’s like an old novelist reuniting with his college buddies. He doesn’t have a Spamalot moment, infusing one of his old hits with some new clever, fun bits. From this point on, Terry Gilliam is a forward-looking director.
At least in theory. Gilliam can’t stop himself from co-writing a movie with Michael Palin. And it’s hard to blame him. Aside from being a notoriously lovely chap, Palin is Python’s second best writer. Time Bandits benefits enormously from Palin’s influence. It’s consistent in character, theme, plot, and tone, an enormous leap in quality from Jabberwocky. While Time Bandits explores a lot of the same ideas as Jabberwocky, it feels more like a movie you can show your kids for fun than one you’d show them as punishment. For the first time, Gilliam directs a classic on his own terms, rather than splitting duties with Terry Jones (like in Holy Grail), or feeling like he’s putting a demo reel on the big screen (Jabberwocky).
Time Bandits has an all-timer of a premise (a step up from Jabberwocky, which only narrowly has a premise). Kevin, a young boy in the English suburbs, is whisked away from his miserable life by six dwarfs who are fleeing their boss — who is God — after stealing a map that allows them to travel time and space. Unlike the Doctor who stole a Tardis and ran away, the dwarfs aren’t interested in seeing the wonders of the universe. They don’t even know the history of the universe they helped create — Napoleon and Agamemnon are unfamiliar names to them. The dwarfs only want to rob the whole universe blind. The cosmos is their Treasure Island — damn the safety of the young boy in their care.
Like its predecessor, Time Bandits scoffs at the idea of heroes. Kevin, ostensibly a fairy tale hero, is more interested in his books and violence than human suffering (as poor Shelley Duvall and Michael Palin find out). The dwarfs are mostly sociopathic upstart criminals. Ian Holm’s Napoleon is too busy giggling at violent puppet shows to accept Castiliogne’s surrender. Robin Hood (who of course is John Cleese) is a phony leading a gang of gratuitously violent Merry Men. Even Sean Connery’s Agamemnon, the only person who treats Kevin with any kindness, casually orders summary executions and leaves Kevin alone in the end. The people in charge aren’t going to save Kevin from mortal danger, or show him how to be a man. Time Bandits is mean — the movie equivalent of running into a museum and tipping over statues.
But Time Bandits’ most galling target is the greatest hero in fiction — God himself, or the Supreme Being, naturally played as a fusty schoolmaster by theater deity Ralph Richardson. In Time Bandits’ Gnostic mythos, the creation of the world was, as Randall the dwarf puts it, “a bit of a botched job, you see. We only had seven days to make it.” God delegated the creation of greenery to the dwarfs (making them another set of venal bureaucrats in the Gilliamverse). You can definitely see the similarities to The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy here — an experimental world goes wrong, a protagonist is uprooted from banal contemporary English life and transported across the cosmos with the non-help of a lousy textual guide. Life of Brian never treated God and creation with this kind of disdain.
Evil, of course, is much worse. David Warner plays Evil as a mildly insecure but ferocious technology nut (like Hitchhiker, digital watches come up). He’s something of a Tolkien villain, betraying Gilliam’s Luddite tendencies with a deference to banal technological progress. The horror of Good, to Gilliam, is its utter toothlessness against Evil; an unwillingness to appreciate the thrills and possible adventures of the universe. Kevin is wide-eyed with amazement at the world around him, something none of the adults seem to appreciate.
Gilliam is a romantic at heart, a lover of adventure with little regard for the human consequences (as we’ll see in The Adventures of Baron Munchausen). Time Bandits is great fun, and Gilliam’s first good movie, but it’s not saying much beyond “the world is a bit shit, isn’t it?” Maybe his next movie will have a little more to say. Time Bandits, like its MacGuffin, is a map to the big holes in the world. But really, if that’s not what you want from a Terry Gilliam movie, you probably should stop reading this series.
George Lock
November 29, 2024 @ 5:57 am
Calling Gilliam Month Python’s Peter Gabriel is such a spot on analogy I can’t believe I’ve never seen anyone else make the comparison. Both are artists who, on their best days, evoke similarly warm fuzzy feelings in me in ways I’ve never quite been able to put my finger on, given that both can also be confrontational and alienating.
George Lock
November 29, 2024 @ 5:59 am
*Monty, not month. Clearly my autocorrect is getting into the Gilliamesque mood
Christine Kelley
November 29, 2024 @ 6:03 am
Somebody pointed out that John Cleese is Python’s Phil Collins, which I really should have figured out first.
George Lock
November 30, 2024 @ 4:49 am
I’m inclined to agree with the Cleese/Collins comparison myself. Certainly from my perspective growing up, I was aware of both of them long before becoming aware of the context of their respective groups.
I guess now the only thing to decide is which Python gets to be Mike Rutherford. Eric Idle?
(Also, hard agree with D.N.’s last paragraph below, regarding Gabriel’s fairly decent progressive credentials vs the increasing reaction of various Pythons).
D.N.
November 29, 2024 @ 12:11 pm
The Gilliam-as-Gabriel analogy works in one context (i.e. the one stated by Christine) but fails in another; namely, Peter Gabriel was the frontman, primary lyricist, and public face of Genesis, while Terry Gilliam was Python’s fringe (and least-known to the public) member — which makes Gabriel’s solo career more unlikely and Gilliam’s more understandable.
I’m more inclined to concur with Christine’s other nomination of John Cleese as the Gabriel of Python, inasmuch as Cleese was the best-known Python and his departure from the group’s TV series happened around the same time Gabriel split from Genesis. You could argue Cleese had put Python behind him with Fawlty Towers and A Fish Called Wanda but Python still clings to his public image in a way Genesis doesn’t to Gabriel — of course, Genesis went on to better-selling (but not better) work post-Gabriel whereas Cleese rejoined Python for the group’s most enduring work (Holy Grail and Life of Brian).
Also, to compare Gilliam and Cleese to Python, you have to ignore the fact that Peter Gabriel is a progressive, and by all accounts a lovely, chap, whereas Gilliam and Cleese are reactionary and deeply unpleasant guys.
SeeingI
December 1, 2024 @ 6:39 pm
I want to see this in the theater when I was nine, and the ending left me utterly unnerved. I now realize that this was the first time I experienced existential dread.
Later that year my dad died in a car wreck, so 1981 was a big year for that sort of thing.
Anton B
November 29, 2024 @ 8:10 am
“…the movie equivalent of running into a museum and tipping over statues.”
Indeed. Ahead of its time.
“Gilliam is Python’s Peter Gabriel”
Yes! I enjoy a bit of Gabriel’s oblique, arty commercialism as much as anyone but it would be difficult to say I’m actually a fan. Python (both the TV show and its creators) have, like Genesis, mostly aged badly. The show reveals its misogyny, racism, classism and sexism more and more. Its difficult to watch these days without resorting to the old “It was a different time” canard. Of the survivors, Cleese has become the irascible reactionary he always portrayed, Idle has done his best to monetize and popularise the brand through musicals etc, while Palin has ossified into a British National Treasure – a warm cup of milky tea. Gilliam alone remains interesting if not always successful. Like Christopher Nolan his movies’ over-ambition often create a top-heavy experience, admirable but hard to actually enjoy.
Christopher Brown
November 29, 2024 @ 2:43 pm
This was the one solo (give or take his co-writer) work by Gilliam that I watched before learning what an unpleasant figure he is, and I’m glad I was able to enjoy it with that sort of innocence; I feel like Time Bandits uniquely benefits from that perspective on a first go. Not only is Warner’s Evil amazing, but the design for his costume and lair is one of the very best cinematic evocations of H.R. Giger not to involve the artist himself.