Read the comments; they can’t be crazier than we are

Skip to content

Elizabeth Sandifer

Elizabeth Sandifer created Eruditorum Press. She’s not really sure why she did that, and she apologizes for the inconvenience. She currently writes Last War in Albion, a history of the magical war between Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. She used to write TARDIS Eruditorum, a history of Britain told through the lens of a ropey sci-fi series. She also wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk, writes comics these days, and has ADHD so will probably just randomly write some other shit sooner or later. Support Elizabeth on Patreon.

45 Comments

  1. weronika mamuna
    May 10, 2025 @ 6:28 pm

    there’s a reasonably successful Polish writer who got his start in the early 00’s writing urban fantasy heavily inspired by Stephen King and Neil Gaiman. his flagship series tells the story of Loki who, following the decline of the Norse gods, becomes a fixer/assassin serving the Christian angels.

    that series ended with Loki, in order to save the world from the anti-Christ, destroys all of the gods, angels, everything – and with them imagination, leaving humanity as cold, rational, disenchanted zombies essentially

    i liked The Story and the Engine much, much better

    Reply

  2. Kazin
    May 10, 2025 @ 6:32 pm

    I’m not sure I’ve ever felt an episode was so delightfully Not Made For Me (a white guy) as this one, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I can’t wait to rewatch it in a few days.

    Reply

  3. Andy Griffiths
    May 10, 2025 @ 6:54 pm

    This isn’t the first episode this series that I’ve liked – in fact I’ve found it a fairly solid run so far generally, probably the most enjoyable since way back in the Capaldi era – but it is the first where I’ve found myself immediately thinking “I need to watch that again!”. Funnily enough, I was also put in mind of Ghostlight while watching it.

    Hopefully it won’t fall apart for me on a rewatch, because I really enjoyed it, right down to even enjoying not “getting” all of it straight away.

    It felt to me like there were elements of something I hadn’t seen before in DW, and that’s always welcome – and I’m not referring simply to the casting or location, although I found that refreshing too.

    Reply

  4. James Whitaker
    May 10, 2025 @ 6:56 pm

    Really, really messy – you can practically spot the join between Ellams’ work as a playwright and all the “Doctor Who arc” stuff – but my god wasn’t this poetic and beautiful? Loved the new take on mythology and spiritualism, thought the atmosphere was impeccable. The story of Belinda was heartbreaking. I will always love Doctor Who that takes wild swings and shows me something I’ve never seen before.

    Mrs Flood being aggressively normal was almost more sinister than her being mysterious. No idea what to think about Poppy showing up; what on Earth is going on there.

    It feels very obvious to me that this series is ending with the show itself being undone – we’ve had The Robot Revolution, in which Belinda is forcibly made a character in someone else’s narrative, Lux, in which the fourth wall is danced all over, Lucky Day, in which the basic premises of the show are called into question by a villain who rejects them all, and now The Story & the Engine, in which Doctor Who is an endless, ongoing narrative that is one amongst many. What narrative collapse could be better than one in which the show itself is erased and replaced with a different programme altogether..?

    Reply

  5. FezofRassilon
    May 10, 2025 @ 6:56 pm

    The only time I can immediately recall the Doctor getting mad at saving his friends is with Wilf in the End of Time

    Reply

  6. Rei Maruwa
    May 10, 2025 @ 7:22 pm

    Ghost Light was exactly what I thought of watching this, and the better episodes of the classic series in general, honestly. It’s filled with symbols and pointed ideas that evoke conceptual associations in the mind, and I’d much rather watch that kind of thing than a hypothetical “cleaned up” version of this episode.

    To dig in to some of the obvious stuff, the Story Engine is of course the TARDIS. A dimensionally-transcendent magic box that crosses space from story to story; it’s just that it only lets you watch them on the wall, rather than letting you actually enter them. It’s honestly striking (in contrast to Davies and McTighe) that the story never makes a huge obvious point of it, never has some big reveal where the Doctor “works out” using (brushed-over) logic that the Barber and Abena are mirrors of the Doctor and a companion, etc. The story actually gets to be about a thing, in a way where it’s obviously deliberate without it caving in to pointing it out in the dialogue. That’s really refreshing.

    Reply

  7. Aardvark
    May 10, 2025 @ 7:25 pm

    When Saga got mentioned in the list of gods I hit pause & went “F me, El Sandifer is influencing the show”. Because if I didn’t read this blog I’d have had no idea Saga existed. The MCU line made me howl with laughter. The list reminded me of the boast of Dai Greatcoat from In Parenthesis. The Jo Martin appearance worked for me, as did McGann being one of the clips on the tv. Because it’s nice to not just trot out the usual favourites. Afterwards my first thought was to wonder what you’d think of the episode, partly because of the Saga bit, but also the focus on the value of storytelling

    Reply

    • renniejoy
      May 10, 2025 @ 8:20 pm

      Same!

      Reply

  8. BG Hilton
    May 10, 2025 @ 7:49 pm

    Much as I disliked the whole Timeless Child crap, I’m kind of okay with Jo Martin acting as visual shorthand for ‘a long time in the Doctor’s past,’ instead of a CG Hartnell or something. Having said that, I’d be open to the return of the spinning mannequin heads from ‘Dimensions in Time.’

    Reply

    • Doctor Memory
      May 10, 2025 @ 8:53 pm

      This is a really solid point: we’ve had now multiple actors doing Hartnell impersonations of varying levels of quality and I can’t say I was ever looking forward to seeing who the next one would be. If the only real consequence of the “Timeless Child” story is that Jo Martin gets an irregular but hopefully useful paycheck to occasionally play “the Doctor from long ago” that seems like an entirely cromulent outcome.

      Reply

    • Paul Mason
      May 10, 2025 @ 8:56 pm

      I agree. While the whole Timeless Child plot was awful, I thought Jo Martin herself was good. And in this particularly case she helped with a niggling worry I had when a line led me to infer that this was the first time the Doctor had been Black. And of course, there is the understated normalisation of a same-sex relationship in the legend told about the bet. Funny, though, that my ignorance of Nigerian myth, and appreciation of Skunk Anansie, had always made me think of Anansi as female…

      Reply

  9. Doctor Memory
    May 10, 2025 @ 9:03 pm

    Well, that just frankly charmed the socks off me. If I were in a nit-picky mood there was no lack of nits to pick, but sometimes you just carry it off on style and swagger and this had both in absolute spades. “The Doctor goes to Africa” in any other era would have been cause for anything from serious concern to outright panic, but this made me think… what took so long? And maybe we should go back soon?

    Reply

    • Ross
      May 10, 2025 @ 10:11 pm

      Technically there’s a couple of scenes in Pyramids of Mars set in “Egypt”. The character of them may answer the question of why they oughtn’t to have done that during that era of televisionmaking

      Reply

      • Einarr
        May 10, 2025 @ 10:34 pm

        And that one episode of The Chase (Ghana, apparently) + ancient Egypt in The Daleks’ Master Plan, one scene of Nefertiti being horny and another of Rupert Graves in a tent on “the African Plains” in Dinosaurs on a Spaceship, the Côte d’Ivoire for one scene in Spyfall, Madagascar in Praxeus… but these are all either dubiously orientalist or just window dressing technicalities.

        Reply

    • Doctor Memory
      May 11, 2025 @ 10:24 am

      One small thing though— “narrative consistency” is obviously not what anyone comes to Doctor Who for (or if they do, they are likely to be disappointed), but still… the Doctor’s objection to the Barber’s plan made reasonable sense in the context of just this episode: humanity needs the gods, because we need to tell stories, that’s how culture is transmitted, etc etc etc. The only problem here is… the Doctor has spent the entire last year and a half murdering gods with abandon! It’s been the throughline of the entire RTD2 era! Seems a bit cheeky for him to start objecting now just because the Barber wants to get rid of them all in one go rather than piecemeal…

      Reply

      • Arthur
        May 11, 2025 @ 11:06 am

        The Doctor’s been fighting the gods of one particular pantheon, which does not actually seem to be associated with a specific Earth culture and whose members regard humans as empty toys to be played with.

        Reply

      • Rei Maruwa
        May 11, 2025 @ 1:39 pm

        Yeah I think there’s a preeeetty clear distinction between “a specific group of malicious trickster figures from outside the universe called the ‘Pantheon of Discord'” and “the gods of actual human mythology in our real lives”. Technically they can both be called “gods”, but I feel like the audience SHOULD be trusted to work out the difference between “Odin, etc.” and “the bad guy from 1966 Doctor Who episode The Celestial Toymaker”. (Although Sutekh’s involvement in this is needlessly confusing.)

        Reply

        • Ross
          May 11, 2025 @ 3:07 pm

          I noticed that last year, they were pretty plain that Sutekh was not a “proper” god, but one of them there “powerful aliens” who got elevated to godlike in his power set (but is not bound by the same rules as the patheon and is, in the end, much less weird than they are), but when they mentioned Sutekh this season, they lumped him in with the patheon in a casual way that seemed very clear that he was along the same lines as Lux and the Maestro.

          Reply

          • Rei Maruwa
            May 11, 2025 @ 6:49 pm

            Well, his Harbinger also called him “the mother and father and other of them all”, which kinda suggests that he created the Pantheon after evolving to their status. Easy enough to headcanon away as “Sutekh is full of himself”, but even Maestro calls him “the Oldest One” earlier. I hate to dismiss it but it sorta just doesn’t make sense, at least from what the characters say.

  10. Ed
    May 10, 2025 @ 10:37 pm

    Definitely felt like this one had a lot of ideas that anyone could argue needed room to breathe – but I liked all the ideas in it and I thought they told a nice story and I think the magic of screenwriting is you can paper over a lot of gaps/etc. with some visual language. Great episode. Will be happy to rewatch eventually.

    Reply

  11. Ryan
    May 10, 2025 @ 10:50 pm

    I feel like this episode works better than any other this series as a mirror for what people want from their Doctor Who, or from TV in general. Largely, this was Doctor Who made for me – high strangeness, secret histories, big wild weird-looking things, a campy villain, the Doctor being extremely Doctory, and a low proportion of action to plot. I largely prefer stories that are mostly people talking with the Doctor at the center of it, talking his way to unraveling the mystery and defeating the villain. While Doctor Who has nice action set pieces from time to time, I tend to think almost everything action-oriented does action better than Doctor Who, and with such short episodes and an abbreviated series, I would prefer to have Doctor Who does what it does best, which is to be a show with the Doctor in it – and this might be the best showcase so far for Ncuti’s Doctor, getting to do very Doctory weird things but in a way that no other actor would play the Doctor; being the Doctor is largely about controlling the room, and Ncuti finds a new sort of energy for doing that that I don’t think I’ve quite seen from other Doctors. And for all the talk of fitting in with humanity, he feels very alien here once he starts confronting the Barber.

    I do feel like there must have been a few things that were cut, or a few weird takes – clearly the episode means to tie the “stories keep us going, stories keep us alive” thing to the need humanity has for what it sees as gods, and that severing those gods from humanity makes us wither because of some sort of reciprocal meaning, but they never quite might that explicit enough for it to be a confident reading of that moment. And in a series in which the Pantheon is so prevalent, you really need to differentiate that it’s not some cosmic power than these other gods are exerting.

    The biggest criminal of the episode was Murray Gold, with the sound mixer as his accomplice. The music was very unearned, and I found it very difficult to understand the cast over the hammy score.

    Reply

  12. Prandeamus
    May 11, 2025 @ 1:47 am

    I want more like this. Engagingly strange “wtf is going on” stories influenced by cultures not my own. I’m not given to close readings, so I don’t generally see structural issues unless I rewatch. Give me more.

    Shades of L. Miles, I thought. The idea of the barber’s shop being like a TARDIS, but not actually one, like the time travelling tent in interference book 2.

    BUT there is some metafictional cancellation arc going on, nononono Rusty, just don’t. If there’s any form of Bobby Ewing walking out of the shower telling me it was just a dream reset, then ugh. I care nothing at all for Mrs Flood, who makes even less sense that Susan Twist. Nothing she does adds value. I’m longing for an anthology season of standalone with maybe some thematic through line.

    Reply

    • Rei Maruwa
      May 11, 2025 @ 5:39 am

      I think I can promise you that there is absolutely zero chance that RTD, or most professional writers, really, would execute these themes the way that fandoms always frame it and are eternally, troublingly, fascinated by (“what if all the episodes I didn’t like were actually FAKE EPISODES to TRICK the doctor into being in bad stories!!!!!!”).

      Reply

  13. Cyrano
    May 11, 2025 @ 3:18 am

    I absolutely adored this episode. I watched it when it hit iPlayer in the morning, was on a high all day then watched it again on broadcast and enjoyed it a second time.

    I love the way this is unquestionably a new voice emerging into Doctor Who and the story goes to new places and does new things, and they feel as naturally Doctor Who as Silurians and quarries. It doesn’t make the show different, it reveals it always had this space inside it.

    I was thrilled by Jo Martin’s appearance. It felt entirely right for this episode that she be nodded to. And I don’t fear it means a return to the Timeless Child storyline. She’s just “the Doctor has a mysterious, mostly forgotten past” now. A grace note that can be played where it adds something, and it felt hugely appropriate that she appear here, in an episode pushing for a weirder universe and that is partly about the Doctor being in a black body.

    It’s odd that in a story that energised me with how fresh it felt, Ncuti Gatwa finally got a “Murray Gold goes bananas in the orchestra while Doctor Who blows up the baddy’s control room” climax and that was tremendously welcome. Everyone mentioned the Saga namedrop but this also moment featured Patrick Troughton peering out of a television screen and ‘Doctor Who being a better story than everything else’. Plus a literal act of narrative substitution – reaching out to the villain with an offer to substitute their story of vengeance with a new one.

    In all, a brilliant bit of Doctor Who from someone who feels like they have a deep affection for the show but a different angle than the standard professional fan. It’ll be a crime if we don’t hear more from Inua Ellams.

    Reply

  14. Solon Discate
    May 11, 2025 @ 3:37 am

    My dad, being somewhat interested in the show but not enough so to actually watch it, sometimes asks me for a rundown of the latest episode. This time I was unable to give a complete summary of the plot without sounding completely unhinged, which is as good an indicator as any that this was a very good episode of Doctor Who.

    Reply

  15. Arthur
    May 11, 2025 @ 4:15 am

    As far as 15 remembering Fugitive goes, my pet theory is that part of 14’s therapy that 15 benefits from involved remembering and reintegrating forgotten past selves – hence Shalka Doctor in Rogue. 14 had ample free time post-Giggle to go poking around in the TARDIS interior, find that pocketwatch, and open it once they felt ready.

    Reply

    • Cyrano
      May 11, 2025 @ 4:28 am

      I just think that now we’re a few years on from the Chibnall Timeless Child Masterplan, the show is freer to play with the elements it finds interesting without being beholden to the whole mechanical plot.

      Certainly in the past the Doctor has remembered things they shouldn’t, that don’t quite make sense. McCoy’s lines that hark back further than the show’s fictional history were never resolved or explained on TV. This is already within the grammar of the show. I don’t think it demands Explanation.

      Reply

      • Arthur
        May 11, 2025 @ 7:27 am

        I don’t think it requires explanation, but neither of us require ice cream. Sometimes it’s nice to make your own ice cream.

        Reply

        • Corey Klemow
          May 11, 2025 @ 1:37 pm

          In this case, my “ice cream” is that in a story that explicitly acknowledges that the Doctor is a story, he can remember what he needs to for the purposes of this particular story. Though before I hit on that I did have a moment of “I guess maybe the Doctor opened the pocket watch off-screen, okay fine.”

          Reply

  16. Rupert
    May 11, 2025 @ 4:38 am

    I hugely admired this episode. The visual aesthetic was perfect; I’m loving the strong theme this series of animation and art being inextricably bound with story-telling. Because of this, I was sometimes getting vibes of Vincent and the Doctor, which also has in common with this story the role of human connection as an essential adjunct to, shall we say, loftier ambitions? I spent quite a bit of the episode genuinely not being sure if they had filmed it in Lagos or not, so convincing were the sets and atmosphere.

    A lot of my favourite types of Doctor Who are the dream-like, surreal stories that leave plenty of room for one’s own thought or interpretation (Ghost Light, Kinda, Warriors’ Gate, Heaven Sent), and this felt a very contemporary and thoughtful follower in that tradition.

    However, whilst I hugely admired it, I didn’t particularly enjoy it (which tallies with my experience of Ghost Light). The point about how necessary it is to enjoy an episode as opposed to being interested in an episode is itself very interesting to me. It comes down to what one’s own needs are as a viewer, I guess. For this viewer, the lack of space and moments of “nothing happening” – which are, in fact, where the development of understanding and narrative coalescing can occur, in both real life and drama/fiction – are, as I keep coming back to, a major issue, one that’s nearly impossible to overcome in a 45-minute single TV story.

    The biggest offender? Probably the constant music. I try, oh I try, not to be bothered by this, knowing it’s just the way of modern TV production. But I feel so overtly emotionally-manipulated by it, that my viewing becomes perilously close to being a chore. Don’t get me wrong, I am a massive fan of incidental music. Some of the Classic Series scores are works of genius that I regularly listen to. But the clue is in the nomenclature – incidental, not primary. The best music enhances the dialogue and action, not runs alongside it. If it’s a musical, fine. But in the medium of drama, all a continual music track does is engender a sense of insecurity in the writing and acting.

    In the current pattern of eight 45-minute episodes per series, I think I would find four stories of two episodes each a more palatable experience. There’d be room to breathe, and room for character, plot, and motivation to develop at a pace that doesn’t necessarily require more than a single viewing. Funnily, it’s the stories that are more accessible on a single viewing that I rewatch more than the compressed, overloaded ones. That doesn’t mean you can’t have a demanding, complex, multi-layered, or intellectual story that is also accessible. But I think I need a certain level of “Doctor Who familiarity” when I view the show? (Perhaps “escapism” is what I’m getting at.) And most of all, I don’t want a massive overload of hyperactivity (although some is fine!), as I get that in so many other areas of life!

    Reply

  17. Simon Kinnear
    May 11, 2025 @ 5:06 am

    This makes a fascinating double-bill with Sinners: both stories about a threat to a black cultural ‘safe space’ which became explorations into the erasure/assimilation of black voices.

    And how great that this exists in Doctor Who! I’m not sure there are many episodes that so clearly harness what I love about the show – its agility and ambition and refusal (at its best) to not keep doing the same thing again and again. As El says, it’s easy to accept the unevenness when the thing as a whole crackles with ideas and emotions.

    Reply

  18. Prole Hole
    May 11, 2025 @ 5:09 am

    I mostly enjoyed this episode but there was one great big thing I felt it was missing and I was acutely aware of it while watching. And it’s that the big camp queen of practically every other Gatwa episode is entirely absent in the episode set in Nigeria. It’s great that the Doctor gets to do this kind of story where he feels “welcomed” at at home and it’s incredibly refreshing – invigorating, even – to see the Doctor go to a part of the world that Doctor Who just doesn’t normally visit. But at the same time he feels “at home” somewhere where homosexuality is criminalised, gay marriage is outlawed, there is capital punishment for being gay in some regions, and it is one of the worst places for an LGBTQ+ person to be. Sure, the barbershop crew seem nice – for whatever limited characterisations they have – but really? It wasn’t touched on, alluded to, or mentioned even once. I know one episode can’t embrace EVERY political concern but given just how LGBTQ+ friendly this iteration of the show has been (and given what’s coming next week…), it’s a glaring, obvious, and conspicuous omission.

    Othewise, a nicely ambitions piece and a very refreshing change of pace. I give not one single toss about either The Pantheon or Mrs Flood and have no sense that either will come together even slightly but though this was clunky in places, it’s light-years better than the drab nothing of Robot Revolution and its ilk and shows more ambition than almost anything else in the era. Plus Jo Martin! Always happy to see Jo Martin.

    Reply

    • Einarr
      May 11, 2025 @ 5:39 am

      I would agree except for “not even once”: he clearly does his more familiar queening out line delivery for “don’t be scared” to Obioma, the most obviously masculine and macho of the barbershop guys, before turning on a dime and delivering the next couple of lines with a much more Nigerian cadence. It’s just after Belinda has entered the barbershop and just before the Barber tries grandstanding about who he is.

      I could also make an argument for “I look so good I could kiss myself”…

      And this IS the episode that also queered the Fugitive Doctor.

      Reply

    • Zeg Must Prove Brains
      May 11, 2025 @ 4:13 pm

      Ncuti Gatwa has already done the ‘queer in Lagos’ episode in Sex Education, so I imagine they wanted to give him new material and show a different side to the country.

      Reply

  19. Richard Lyth
    May 11, 2025 @ 5:57 am

    When Saga was mentioned I thought “Hey, I know about them from Elizabeth Sandifer!” and felt very pleased with myself. Then Anansi was mentioned and I thought “Hey, I know about them from Neil Gaiman!” and felt considerably less pleased with myself.

    Reply

  20. John K
    May 11, 2025 @ 9:06 am

    I am very confused by this episode. I really like the idea and the theme, but not so much the execution and several plot points. I really like the idea of the actual creator of gods going back to fight them. I also like the spider walking on the web of nexus, has some seriously occult/Jungian connotations. However, the episode is pretty much a huge exposition dump. We don ‘t get to really see how the doctor started going to the barber shop, why he cares for the people there. The doctor being angry at Omo also feels quite out of character. The doctor at any incarnation is THE person to solve a situation like this. Any doctor would willingly get in and save everybody and would at least be somewhat sympathetic to the people that called him. Also, about that: I don ‘t understand how tf he was summoned. He went there randomly and I guess they didn ‘t prevent him from entering? He forced open the door ffs. If the story Omo told somehow “summoned” him, did he say a story about Belinda to summon her? If so, why? In any case, things should be explained better. A ship-in-bottle episode can be very good (see Midnight), but this was like doctor who characters narrating exposition dump that is also incomplete.
    Also, why did Belinda ‘s story superpower the engine? Of course the story of a modern day first-world citizen is much more powerful than the imaginative musings of the african side characters. Can ‘t have an episode without weird bootlicking/colonial undertones these days it seems. This may seem like a nitpick, but it really bothers me. The Doctor would be a perfect storyteller because he would say very fantastical tales that are also real (and this could work as an anthology of doctor who ministories if done right). But no, I guess the african people were toο stupid to just talk about their day and overpower the engine themselves.
    The drama about Abby also falls quite flat because we just hear about it. The doctor could start recounting the story that includes her and then the whole concept could work better (let me tell you the story where I almost married the daughter of a god or something like that). Bottom line: RTD level of good idea, Chibnal level of execution. Chibnal bad

    Reply

  21. John G Wood
    May 11, 2025 @ 9:33 am

    Did this cohere? Not really. Did I love it? Hell yes! Definitely my favourite of the season, and in company with the top two of the previous season. My biggest complaint is that Belinda has been sidelined for two episodes in a row (though I did enjoy the contrast between the Doctor’s instant welcome to Lagos as an old friend and hers as a “rich tourist”). I could list niggles till the cows come home, but I’d rather not as it does nobody any good and goes against the ethos of the story.

    The Barber’s backstory immediately made me think of Storytime by Nightwish: “It was the night before/When all through the world/No words, no dreams, then one day/A writer by a fire/Imagined all of Gaia/Took a journey into a child-man’s heart”. That also fitted rather neatly with the heart-within-a-mind metaphysical engine reveal.

    The episode also wins points for the resolution being based on kindness and forgiveness being cast in all directions, which is all too rare in any form of drama. Plus, everybody lives (assuming the spider-vehicle was not a living thing). Two thumbs up.

    Reply

  22. Arthur
    May 11, 2025 @ 9:40 am

    Incidentally, the paralleling of this season and the previous one still stands. This is in the Dot and Bubble niche…

    Supporting cast predominantly of a particular race.
    The fact that the Doctor is black is relevant.
    It’s about the mechanisms by which cultures craft narratives and a sense of belonging (oral storytelling traditions from the dawn of humanity to the barber’s chair on the one hand, twitter and other toxic socky meeds on the other).
    The Doctor implores someone to let him save them, despite the fact that they’re opposed to taking that help.

    There’s some really major differences too, but differences which are flat-out inversions and therefore still kind of count as links.

    This was set in the heart of a Black community, Dot and Bubble was set in the heart of a Nazi one.
    Dot and Bubble was about an incredibly new means of communication, this was about a form of communication that’s almost certainly as old as humanity and very likely dates back to the proto-humans that the modern species descends from.
    In Dot and Bubble, the supporting cast are all implied to die. Here, just this once, everybody lives!

    Reply

  23. Christine Cherry
    May 11, 2025 @ 9:50 am

    I was reading the episode as implying that the Doctor and Omo were in a relationship and so the Doctor’s anger was less about having to save them and more about the Doctor feeling like he was being taken advantage of by someone who knew him intimately.

    Reply

    • Arthur
      May 11, 2025 @ 10:11 am

      Omo certainly seems to know much more about the Doctor – Time Lord status and all – than you’d expect from “kid he met briefly once, and then whose barbershop he frequented whilst trying to fit in and be human and accepted somewhere”, doesn’t he?

      I am sure Big Finish are already brainstorming castings for Young Omo for the eventual audio dramas where he’s a companion/boyfriend.

      Reply

    • Zeg Must Prove Brains
      May 11, 2025 @ 4:17 pm

      I felt that plot point didn’t land because Gatwa was doing his best with the emotional beat but the actor playing Omo wasn’t giving him anything to push off. Not guilt, defiance, shock, nothing.

      Reply

  24. Narsham
    May 11, 2025 @ 9:13 pm

    I understand the Doctor’s anger: not just that his friend helped trap him without warning, but that this was a space where the Doctor didn’t have to be the “saving people” Doctor. His safe place was made dangerous and he was angry about that. There’s more to be said about connection there, too, but I’ll just observe that the Doctor got past that.

    I loved the story.

    Two stories to tell you all: when I was younger, my local PBS station aired omnibus Who episodes at 10 pm Saturday. I’d lie in bed, record the episode on VHS as I watched, then switch the TV off and go to sleep. Ghost Light was completely baffling. I should have rewatched at once, but it was late and the deal with my parents was that I could stay up until the story ended.

    Sometime later I was home sick in bed. I often watched Doctor Who in that situation. I watched Ghost Light again and was baffled. This time, though, I rewatched again immediately. Maybe I had a mild helpful fever, but many of the pieces fell into place even if they didn’t all perfectly connect. And the story made a stronger impression because I had to fill in the gaps myself, weaving the strands to hold everything together. Which is why this episode made sense to me, because it is about what it invites, or demands: a welcome can be an injunction if you care strongly enough.

    The second story is only four words long. It’s not my story, and I didn’t write it. I found it in a museum as a tag on an item, not meant to be a story. But it is. I’m working on my own words, and I have doubts about my likely brevity, but here’s someone else’s story. I can’t say whose for obvious reasons. But since the Doctor mentioned Hemingway’s, I feel compared to share this one here:

    Klan robes. Anonymous donation.

    Reply

  25. Jesse
    May 11, 2025 @ 9:28 pm

    The word I said to my daughter after we finished watching it was “overpacked.” But “overstuffed” works too.

    Kind of a mess, but a good mess.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Doctor Memory Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.