Fashionably late capitalism

Skip to content

Elizabeth Sandifer

Elizabeth Sandifer created Eruditorum Press. She’s not really sure why she did that, and she apologizes for the inconvenience. She currently writes Last War in Albion, a history of the magical war between Alan Moore and Grant Morrison. She used to write TARDIS Eruditorum, a history of Britain told through the lens of a ropey sci-fi series. She also wrote Neoreaction a Basilisk, writes comics these days, and has ADHD so will probably just randomly write some other shit sooner or later. Support Elizabeth on Patreon.

59 Comments

  1. Kazin
    May 24, 2025 @ 8:36 pm

    As much as I enjoyed the experience of watching the episode and letting my mind spin trying to figure out where it would resolve next week, yeah, there really isn’t much to say about it yet. I do hope some of the quiet political bits of the episode are picked up on next week, and I’ll admit my hopes are up about it, just to see what that looks like in Doctor Who packed with Susan, two Ranis, the Doctor, and Belinda.

    Reply

  2. Kate
    May 24, 2025 @ 8:49 pm

    I think I’ve developed an allergy to lore.

    Reply

    • Corey Klemow
      May 24, 2025 @ 11:05 pm

      “Lore” is such a lovely, poetic word… but back in the day, we called it “fanwank,” and that was far more honest.

      Reply

    • Ross
      May 24, 2025 @ 11:35 pm

      My son thinks “lore” is the best thing ever, and every franchise he takes an interest in is because it’s stuffed with “lore”. He used to be a potterhead, but ultimately found the “lore” aspect too lacking (and this was before he was old enough to appreciate that supporting the potterverse funded absolute human garbage).

      “There’s LORE” is what got him to take an interest in Doctor Who. Which turned out to be lucky because he secreted off a copy of my collection of DVD rips to watch while not paying attention in school, allowing me to recover it when my home NAS crashed last week.

      Reply

      • Corey Klemow
        May 25, 2025 @ 1:34 am

        There’s been many a time over the last 20 years when I’ve wanted to show my 1980s teenage self 21st century Doctor Who and watch it blow his mind on all sorts of levels. That me definitely loved lore/fanwank for its own sake and was far less analytical and would have enjoyed “Wish World” far more than I did once I started thinking about what I just watched, and would have been jumping up and down at the return of Omega, when I’m just hoping it’ll all mean something next week.

        Then again, I shrieked out loud at not just the first but also the second Susan cameo last week, so that kid is not entirely dead. 🙂

        (But also, RTD has set me up to expect Susan’s return to mean actually dealing with the emotional fallout over their parting rather than just “Susan is back,” which we already got in “The Five Doctors,” so…)

        Reply

  3. Jesse
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:04 pm

    That’s an awfully long list of things to like in an episode that’s fucking rubbish…

    I am in the odd position of being pessimistic that they’ll stick the landing next week (Omega and the Rani, yawn) and yet enjoying this week quite a bit. A totalitarian dystopia slowly falling apart, almost Ubik-style, while we hear a storybook backstory to the Rani that pointedly calls the Doctor “Doctor Who”…this was enjoyable, and it could resolve itself into something memorably good. I’ll cling to that “could” for a while.

    Reply

    • Dave Ferguson
      May 25, 2025 @ 4:27 am

      Yes. Someone else noticed the similarity with PKD, though I was thinking mostly of Eye in the Sky.

      Reply

  4. James Whitaker
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:12 pm

    You’re spot on here – first episode of the series I was checking the clock for because nothing was happening. The big problem, really, is that because none of our heroes are themselves at all, there can therefore be no drama whatsoever because nothing means anything to them, so we don’t care. Essentially just 45 minutes of thumb twiddling until we get to the end and the world collapses. Oh it’s Omega, oh so what, who cares, doesn’t mean anything to them so why should it mean anything to us?

    I did enjoy the world as a heteronormative hell, and the reveal that the Rani was using Conrad to create a deliberately crap and facile world so people wouldn’t believe in it as part of a larger plan to collapse reality, feels very classic – we establish that mugs can fall through tables, let’s have the climax be that on a colossal scale. But yeah… Next week could be a masterpiece, or it could be awful and sour everyone on the series as a whole. What a weird situation.

    Reply

  5. Scurra
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:12 pm

    Yeah, that was a pretty classic “part one of an RTD two-part series finale” really, wasn’t it? It span its wheels even more than last year, but that was helped by the sheer chemistry of Gatwa and Sethu, especially what I thought was the genuine feeling of pain they both exhibit when the ‘truth’ about Poppy intrudes into their apparent reality. And I did like the whole Wandavision vibe of that first half.

    But there’s definitely a sense of RTD sticking two fingers up at Disney by making twenty episodes of Doctor Who that have required the audience to know sixty years of deep dive tv lore – and other (books/comics etc) stuff as well. Calling this “season one/two” is perhaps the best joke he’s ever done.

    I will admit that the God of Wishes is a pretty neat Pantheon idea though (especially the 7x7x7 bit.) It enables a slightly different spin on God of Stories whilst also offering a reasonable Deus ex Machina for the next episode that’s not quite “it was all a dream”. That’s really not enough to save this one though.

    Reply

  6. Megara Likes Trash, OK?
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:21 pm

    (I just woke up so this may be disjointed, apologies if so)
    I enjoyed it well enough; were this my review above I’s have started out with those “OK. Let’s talk about the good bits” bullet points, and then move on to the lesser traits. I appreciated the meta-commentary on the desire to seed doubt to break reality, a tactic the world’s suffering under right now. For all the criticisms about the show shoving everything into our faces, here it was pretty well worked into the story without the usual neon embroidery people decry. I get the structural boredom of “the first part of the two-parter,” but it will be what it will be, anything can work if done well enough so it’s worth a shot (“maybe next week will be better!” our perpetual cry ha ha). The first part can be used for some fun faffing about, and I’m OK when a show takes time to faff about or delivery character moments (again when done decently), and we did get a few – just don’t be a boring spinning of the wheel. This is something of an eye of the beholder issue as you enjoy it or seethe for the show not getting to the fireworks factory soon enough. There are problems sure, hardly any works are perfect.

    One last funny note:

    “No, really, Russell T Davies seems to legitimately expect the audience to have gone and watched The Mark of the Rani. ”

    I literally saw someone online this morning say they were off to go do this today after watching this episode.

    Reply

    • Megara Like Trash, OK?
      May 24, 2025 @ 9:35 pm

      Something else I feel like throwing out here, feel free to ignore: it doesn’t matter if the lore shown on the screen today is new or years old. Star Trek, Star Wars, the MCU, comics, etc. do this all the time. New fans just roll with it and hey, are suddenly interested in this third rate team “Guardians of the Galaxy” or whatever. A friend who grew up a DC fan in the 70s and 80s told me that conversely, this sort of thing was catnip for him as it made him interested to go back and investigate that wide imaginary world. When I was first getting into Doctor Who during the same time period, I had a list of all the episodes up to that point that I had made a photocopy of. I spent real time rereading it, imagining how exciting it would be to see those two Peladon stories or even the very first episode! just based on the titles alone…

      I really don’t feel this is quite the failing some say it is.

      Reply

      • Paul Mason
        May 24, 2025 @ 10:16 pm

        I agree with your point 100%. Maybe the reason it is regarded as such a failing is that it was done so badly in the Ian Levine period, and the idea has stuck that it will always be like that?

        There was a period between 1967 and 1972 when I was first watching the show in which there were no Daleks. The fact that I hadn’t seen them did not in any way weaken Day of the Daleks for me: quite the contrary. Viewers of the show are aware that there is a backstory, and there is stuff they haven’t seen which is nevertheless a part of the show. They don’t necessarily feel alienated when this is invoked. However, we do also suffer from the second-screen problem where people want stuff explained so they can get it even if they aren’t paying attention.

        Having said all this, I suspect we are all agreed that it can be done quite badly! Omega’s last appearance wasn’t exactly something to celebrate.

        Reply

      • zhinxy
        May 25, 2025 @ 1:07 am

        I think fans who like to look up lore would still be tantalized if the show established “She was a ruthless mad scientist who’d let nothing get in the way of her experiments,” Although that could highlight how she’s not particularly mad-sciencey in this episode…

        Reply

        • Megara Likes Trash OK?
          May 25, 2025 @ 3:36 am

          Yeah, I do agree that this episode should still have had the usual moment when the Doctor and current companion are backed into a corner looking terribly concerned, and the companion says “The Rani, who or what is a Rani?!” and then the Doctor gives a single sentence summation. I don’t find it to be a horribly unforgivable sin though, just a flaw.

          Reply

      • Bedlinog
        May 25, 2025 @ 2:20 am

        RTD severely misunderstands even the most enthusiastic Who viewer aged around 13 years old if he expecs them to get through even a minute of Mark and the Rani

        Reply

        • Prole Hole
          May 25, 2025 @ 4:17 am

          And yet Mark of the Rani remains, as of time of writing, the high watermark for Rani TV stories. Ponder that for a second…

          Reply

    • prandeamus
      May 25, 2025 @ 4:51 am

      I’d not seen MotR other than a few clips before, so I spun it up on iPlayer last night. It’s true that it suffers from so many of the faults of the era, the main one being the Doctor-Peri interactions. One wonders why that poor woman didn’t take a run into the woods to have a good scream like Belinda did yesterday, before returning with a Large Axe. But I found it lot more watchable than, say, Vengeance on Varos. I shall perhaps steel myself for TatR another time.

      Reply

  7. Jesse S
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:29 pm

    Wow. Overstuffed and overcomplicated. What must the casual viewer think?

    Nobody was asking for the Rani to return. Or Omega for that matter (last seen 42 years ago!). These names mean nothing to anyone save the true middle-aged anoraks.

    Even the callbacks to relatively recent episodes went largely unexplained. My family were confused by Rogue’s appearance (“Who is this guy?”) until his “I love you” reminded me that he was that guy last year that the Doctor had a crush on for 30 minutes. The plot hinges on people remembering that two years ago David Tennant threw salt over his shoulder and fretted about introducing superstition into the universe. Even the recurring modern characters like Shirley might be a bit of a stretch for the casual viewer to recall.

    And perhaps ironically, I think the episode suffered from being a rehash of things we’ve seen before. We’ve seen John Smith living a pleasant domestic life. We’ve seen Ruby’s mother reject her. We’ve seen the small plucky band of underground freedom fighters keeping the flame of the Doctor’s memory alive.

    Spot on about the modern two part finale structure requiring the first episode to tread water for 45 minutes and then the second not have enough time to tell its story satisfactorily. Makes me miss two parters that were just solid and simple stories. Never thought I would be remembering Rise of the Cybermen with nostalgia!

    It’s frustrating because, indeed, there was a lot to like in the episode. The acting was very solid, some of the visuals were very impressive, and one can’t deny the fannish pleasure at seeing the various recurring characters doing their little 60 second inserts. But for me this was the definition of the whole being less than the sum of the parts.

    Reply

    • Cully
      May 25, 2025 @ 1:57 am

      I’m sorry, but I think the suggestion that casual modern viewers might struggle to recall characters like Shirley, a character who appeared literally three episodes ago, is patently absurd. And even if that were the case, are those the people whom any show should cater to in its writing?

      There’s a difference between being (potentially, ymmv) fanwanky and overly referential and trusting the audience to be able to keep track of a tertiary ensemble cast, something even the most lowest-common-denominator sitcom used to take as given.

      Reply

  8. Hickory McCay
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:30 pm

    From the first minute of this episode, I immediately thought “of course, the one modern comics crossover Doctor Who hasn’t riffed on for a season finale, Milk Wars!”.

    Reply

  9. june eg8ert
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:45 pm

    i think regardless of how successful or not the episode was, susan giving the doctor the message instead of rogue would have undermined the whole point of that sequence thematically—the doctor’s doubts about conrad’s patriarchal-fascist world have to come from some kind of rejection of its values, in this case by the doctor being super gay. but susan giving the message would mean that the doctors doubts ultimately came from his granddaughter, part of a normative nuclear family arrangement. which would make the whole thematic situation much weaker

    Reply

    • Madeline Jones
      May 24, 2025 @ 10:00 pm

      I agree with this. Especially coming pretty soon after the chilling “you can’t call another man beautiful”, having Rogue appear is very thematically appropriate as a reminder to John Smith that he has queer feelings within himself that are being suppressed, as the thing that helps crack him out of not questioning this reality.

      Reply

      • Jesse S
        May 24, 2025 @ 10:29 pm

        Honestly, this is one of the few times where I think it would have improved if the subtext was a bit more on the nose instead of less. As the episode stands, I didn’t really get any sense that it was “about” questioning one’s societal expectations, etc. It just felt very rote sci-fi, telling us stuff we already know. The fake world is fake. Figure it out, Doctor! But alas, he never really did until the Rani explained it all.

        Reply

  10. fred
    May 24, 2025 @ 9:58 pm

    what did RTD mean when he used a photo of the Abbot of Amboise for Hartnell in the flashback of all doctors

    I just wish this episode didn’t spend so much time on establishing that the obvious fake reality was fake, even if the ‘doubt was the point’ payoff is admittedly kinda fun. Now that Omega’s in the mix we’re gonna be even more deprived of Ncuti and Archie (and Anita Dobson) playing off each other. How far this series could’ve gone if we got more than 8 episodes… at least the CGI and sets were cool enough to make me not think too deeply on first watch.

    Reply

  11. Joe Kessler
    May 24, 2025 @ 10:00 pm

    Rogue’s quick video insert was apparently filmed at the same time as his season one episode, which is revealing insofar as it means Davies has had a lot of this in mind for a while, and perhaps didn’t do enough reflection and listening to the critical reception between seasons as might have been appropriate.

    Reply

    • Arakus
      May 24, 2025 @ 11:31 pm

      The seasons were written pretty much back to back from what I understand, I think the only episodes that would’ve been out at the time this was written are the 60th specials and Church on Ruby Road (based on DWM bits from rtd)

      Reply

    • Mike
      May 25, 2025 @ 3:58 am

      Yeah, as Arakus says, these seasons were made back to back so there was no chance of reflecting or changing anything substantial between seasons.

      Reply

  12. Corey Klemow
    May 24, 2025 @ 10:20 pm

    Speaking of being dementedly charmed, I am perversely enjoying Pip & Jane Baker getting an on-screen credit on Doctor Who in the year 2025. (Also, the Rani once again turning someone into a plant. Also also, the still of Kate O’Mara from “Dimensions in Time” – it’s canon now, no take-backsies!)

    My main problem with this episode, which I very much enjoyed moment-to-moment, is that the stuff that had any substance to it – Conrad’s fascistic, paternalistic, conformist world and the fact that those who didn’t conform were swept out of sight and were in a better position to see the truth of that world from the outside and rebel against it – was backgrounded by all the fanboy lore nonsense taking center stage. The Omega reveal got an “oh, for god’s sake” from me. Though now that I think about it, Omega’s original modus operandi as someone who made a world to suit his will and became a hollowed-out person in the process could end up being a parallel to Conrad and even a cautionary warning for him (which he will hopefully ignore and get his proper comeuppance and not a redemption arc).

    Reply

    • Ross
      May 24, 2025 @ 11:41 pm

      Omega… Well, he had to come back some day (In my “Counter-factual Doctor Who revival powered by bad ideas” art project, Omega was the returning villain for the 50th anniversary special, and then reappeared in the equivalent to the Master’s role in the equivalent to “The End of Time”) , but having him come back at the same time as The Rani seems like eating your seed corn? When we someday get a “Season 3”, they’re going to have to bring back The Quarks.

      Reply

  13. Seulgi누나
    May 24, 2025 @ 10:37 pm

    What they done to Belinda made me really uncomfortable.
    We have two brainwashed companions in this episode. One of them has agency, her own B-plot and joins silly resistance that tries to hack TV signal with an Ipad, but they are trying.
    Other is reduced to tradwife, who is a bit too trigger happy to call black van on people. Which has some unfortunate implications by itself, but also highlights her role in the series overall. Last time she did something meaningful (i.e not being background character, damsel in distress or reason for male lead righteous fury) to the plot was “Lux”. It’s not the first time POC companion gets short end of the stick compared to her blonde predecessor.

    Reply

    • Nick
      May 25, 2025 @ 4:57 am

      I can imagine that if Ruby (or almost any other modern companion) was the wife in this episode, then that table mugs scene would be the cue for her trust of the Doctor to break through the false reality. Whereas Belinda’s reaction to John Smith’s doubts was not just to disbelieve him, but to report him.

      Maybe if the series had continued Belinda’s introductory characterisation as a companion who’s unusually skeptical of the Doctor, then her reaction would have felt like a natural continuation/escalation of that?

      Unfortunately that wouldn’t solve the uncomfortable optics you mention.

      Reply

      • Seulgi누나
        May 25, 2025 @ 5:13 am

        Problem is, that distrust pretty much went out of the window in second episode. And even if it didn’t, reporting neighbors and relatives to a vaguely fascist government is not something I expect from Doctor Who companions, even reluctant. Especially after she had her own moment of doubts over nature of the world.

        Reply

  14. BG Hilton
    May 24, 2025 @ 10:51 pm

    I’m kind of hoping Omega is a fakeout – unless the Doctor beats him by slow-motion judo-ing the dark side of his mind.

    The bit that struck me as actually interesting was the plummeting Doctor insisting that Poppy was really his daughter – particularly when we know that his granddaughter is due for an appearance.

    Reply

  15. Tobias
    May 24, 2025 @ 11:03 pm

    I tend to enjoy “something is Wrong with the world” stories, so much of this worked pretty well for me; I got something of a “The Lathe of Heaven” vibe from the altered world (if the protagonist of that book had been terrible, anyway), and the small hints that mugs fall through tables all the time in this world were unsettling.

    That said, this season has done very little to shake my feeling that it would benefit from a few more episodes. I have no idea how much credence to give the “Gatwa is leaving the show” rumors, but it feels like a huge missed opportunity if that is the case; especially with the shorter seasons, it feels like there are a lot more facets of this Doctor left to explore.

    Reply

  16. Ross
    May 24, 2025 @ 11:32 pm

    All I can think about just at the moment is that there was a Doctor Who choose-your-own-adventure book I read in the 80s in which the “good” ending revealed that Omega was the Doctor’s grandfather.

    Reply

  17. zhinxy
    May 25, 2025 @ 12:38 am

    I’m eager to find out how bringing Omega back helps The Rani’s mad science.

    Reply

  18. Bennett
    May 25, 2025 @ 12:46 am

    I can’t help but wonder what the reaction would be if you could time travel back to RTD’s first era, where he held back even the word “Gallifrey” for two seasons, and reveal that in 2025 he’d be writing a finale featuring Omega, Susan, two Ranis, Kate Stewart and Mel Bush. It’s almost fun in its exuberance, except for the part where none of it amounts to anything or is even having that much fun.

    I agree with the consensus that this story is doing interesting things apart from that, especially in showing how family, neighbours and coworkers enforce norms regardless of how absurd and harmful they are. I found the wheelie bins full of “slips” an intriguingly evocative image, tying in a very real weekly ritual we perform interfacing with an aspect of modern society we live in some degree of denial about.

    Very rich fruit for a writer with Davies’ interests…which is all jettisoned into the Underverse for an insipid cliffhanger. And in the wake of that, I cannot see how The Reality War could possibly end up as the stronger of the two halves. But we shall see.

    Reply

  19. Rei Maruwa
    May 25, 2025 @ 1:10 am

    I actually really liked it! Yes, that is primarily on the strength of just seeing a bunch of weird loaded ideas (such as the ones in your bullet points), but that kept me entertained.

    Maybe the weirdest thing in it for me, though: the skeleton beasts are animals that never existed, yes? As in, the sorts of animals whose bones are fashioned into the masks and armor of Faction Paradox???

    Reply

  20. Bedlinog
    May 25, 2025 @ 1:49 am

    Seriously, what’s with all the damn flashbacks, all the time? Whether it’s to Mark of the Rani, the episode Conrad was in, or to remind us of what happened in the actual episode just 10 minutes ago? Is thia actually how TV is now?
    And while I’m at it, is it now obligatory to flash up all the incarnations of the doctor on-screen at key dramatic moments? Feels like I’m watching a clip show.

    Reply

    • Nick
      May 25, 2025 @ 4:11 am

      Is thia actually how TV is now?

      Judging by the new Mission: Impossible film, which features a large quantity of flashback clips from previous films in the series (including at least one that’s shown twice!), it’s also how movies are now.

      Reply

      • Bedlinog
        May 25, 2025 @ 5:49 am

        Fine, I guess, as a cute way to reward those who keep forking out good money to keep following a franchise. But Wish World literally flashes back to remind us that Ruby had knocked at the Doctor & Belinda’s door earlier in the episode. It’s like the show is petrified that people aren’t paying attention for more than five minutes, but at the same time invites us to find significant a giggling laugh from 2023, oh, and also, a villain last mentioned when his ‘hand’ became a thing in a story from 1988.

        Maybe I’m just getting old.

        Reply

  21. Louis
    May 25, 2025 @ 1:52 am

    I just feel really sorry for Varada Sethu. What a waste this series has turned out to be for her. Her first two episodes formed a solid introduction, and then…

    Once again, the POC companion draws the short straw: consider Martha next to Rose & Donna, Bill next to Amy & Clara, Yaz & Ryan next to Graham, and now Belinda next to Ruby. Belinda had such promise early on, but the show is consistently more interested in the white companions.

    Reply

    • Seulgi누나
      May 25, 2025 @ 2:09 am

      Arguably she had it the worst so far.
      Bill, Yaz and Ryan at least did stuff on regular basis while not even being sole companions.
      Martha didn’t stick the landing and her crush was cringe, but she had agency.
      Belinda was just sidelined and then became stepford collaborator.

      Reply

      • Prole Hole
        May 25, 2025 @ 4:56 am

        Martha’s best moment (well, one of them) was her, “oh, she was a BLONDE” in “Utopia” when even she gets heartily sick of the whole Rose thing. Freema’s just so good in that moment and it’s hard to imagine it’s not real frustration bleeding through.

        Reply

  22. Colin Logan
    May 25, 2025 @ 2:17 am

    The Rani, Omega, and Susan all return at once. Seriously. I don’t think the show will be cancelled, but it’s hard to argue it doesn’t deserve to be. And that’s before we even get to it being done via a clunky, ludicrously long monologue which repeats itself endlessly and still fails to describe who any of them are properly.

    I think the Big Finish comparison is frankly too kind. It’s the sort of thing you imagine might be the grand plan of one of those fans with no professional writing experience but an entire era of their own planned out.

    I adored the first ~20 minutes, so it’s far from the worst episode ever, but The Timeless Children may well be the only one more fundamentally misconceived.

    Reply

    • Prole Hole
      May 25, 2025 @ 5:03 am

      I think there’s now a question as to whether the Rani or the Master holds the award for the longest “standing around just expositing plot at the Doctor” (and no, the “this isn’t just exposition!” line doesn’t cover it. It’s just smugly dreadful). I’m not going to mount a defence of The Timeless Children but at least New Who viewers had plenty of time (and seasons) to be familiar with Gallifrey, Cybermen and the Master. Why are New New Who fans meant to care about a new character who isn’t explained, some random old lady on a telly and someone called Omega? They could have announced it was Swatch the Rani wanted to find in the Underverse and it would have had the same impact. I think I actually prefer The Timeless Children to this and that’s saying something. What a monumentally shit episode.

      Reply

      • Omega? More Like... A MEGA disappointment
        May 25, 2025 @ 5:39 am

        RTD’s sadly lost his touch. Hard to believe the writer behind Utopia’s pitch-perfect reveal (a building up of tension that engages every level of fan – from diehard anorak to casual viewer) is the same person responsible for this week’s episode. “Omega” is thrown into the mix so lackadaisically, without any real sense of the stakes ramping up or an imminent twist, that I actually managed to speak over the entire reveal with a casual comment about something else. I had to rewind just to catch it.

        Reply

  23. PaperMartin
    May 25, 2025 @ 3:43 am

    I sincerely wished (lmao) that the whole “far right wandavision” part of this was its own episode untied from any other plotline instead of the finale
    Felt like having it be part of the finale was an even worse version of Turn Left abandonning the interesting parts of its premise 2/3rd of the way in to have rose return and set up the stolen earth or whichever finale it was
    Imagine if sutehk was here for half of dot & bubble for some reason

    Reply

  24. Camestros Felapton
    May 25, 2025 @ 3:44 am

    I’ve been complaining for a couple of weeks bout Google repeatedly insisting that the most recent episode of Doctor Who was Castrovalva (season 117), but it turns out it was sort of prophetic. A fake world constructed by an old time lord enemy as a Doctor trap. I did like the idea that the Rani(s) where trying to intensify the level of doubt rather than suppress it (or supressing it to make it more intense), sort of accelerationist scepticism.

    I can’t call it a bad episode given the giant floaty skeleton animals and Captain Poppy but I also can’t call it a successful one.

    Reply

  25. Jake
    May 25, 2025 @ 3:55 am

    There’s a clip in the preview for next week where the Rani explains she wants to use Omega to “build a new Gallifrey”, which retroactively clarified her plan but uhh I think this episode should’ve done that.

    Also “do you know what that means?” is a pretty lame thing to shout as you’re plummeting to your death lol

    Reply

  26. Dave Ferguson
    May 25, 2025 @ 4:23 am

    Am I the only person to notice the similarity between this and some of Phillip K Dick’s work, in particular The Eye in the Sky. In that novel the protagonists are projected by mishap into a series of alternative realities which turn out to be the various perceptual world of those involved, so we get fundamentalist world, elderly pride world, communist world etc. If there was any influence a beat has been missed by having only one world.

    Reply

  27. Susan Stan
    May 25, 2025 @ 5:25 am

    After this episode finished I went “Oh so it is getting cancelled, then.” Not because it was especially bad – it started strong, I liked the slip, LOVED the huge bone beasts – but because the show is falling into the all-too-familiar trap of catering to a fan minority, instead of just being good television. I say this as an Arc of Infinity apologist: “The Rani brings back Omega!” is disastrous. I felt absolutely nothing at either of those character reveals.

    Now, Susan, on the other hand…

    Reply

  28. Charlie
    May 25, 2025 @ 5:28 am

    The line in the preview about the Rani using Omega’s body to build a new Gallifrey is leading me to believe that Omega is dead, which a) gives me some hope that next week might not be an overstuffed washout, and b) sounds like a potentially cool plot (‘the Rani rebuilds Gallifrey using Omega’s corpse’). If not then it’ll definitely be the Spiderman 3 of series finales, with too many villains at once (and hopefully Ncuti Gatwa doing the emo Peter Parker dance).

    Reply

  29. prandeamus
    May 25, 2025 @ 5:28 am

    I very much enjoyed the episode. I am genuinely looking forward to next week to see how it turns out. HOWEVER…

    I’d prefer to see Lore more restricted, get back to a show made of anthology stories with a broad through line. Seasons without extended finales. Let the Doctor have new adventures in different situations most of the time. Yes, there will be occasional returns from Daleks to keep the Nation estate happy. I realise that is is contrary to popular taste and the AmazDisniFlix model, and I get that it may not happen. What was the line about comics trying to imitate Jack Kirby and the sincerest imitation would be to do something more original (I’ll be flamed for a misquote no doubt)?

    RTD’s crowning glory will always 2005. Knowing that it had to have wide appeal, he stayed clear of excess continuity, dropped a few little Easter eggs, but generally addressed an audience that had forgotten or never knew the core ideals of the show. Not quite a reboot, but in the style of one.

    Lore just isn’t as necessary as some people think. The concept of “maintaining a wish and keeping it coherent is mentally draining” is true on multiple levels. It’s true for Conrad (well, he tells us, it’s not shown). We don’t need to invoke the Lore of Omega from 1973 to see and know it. We don’t need to reference the Land of Fiction to see it and know it. We don’t need to resurrect WhizzKid to tell is.

    Absolute fealty to The Lore is no better than Newton’s Sleep.

    Reply

  30. wyngatecarpenter
    May 25, 2025 @ 5:35 am

    I quite liked the stuff in the imaginary world – Conrad’s ideal society being a warped , more oppressive version of the 1950s made sense. But yes , I lost interest once it got to the Rani and her grand schemes and CGI end of the world (is that every RTD finale? Not far off ). I am slightly amused that RTD seems to have been trolling fans all along – the pay off to a two season mystery being the Rani , always a rubbish character, and then suddenly we find out he’s tricked us and the Big Bad was Omega all along. But – where is the CGI Omega looming into view at the end of the episode? Surely that should be how the episode ends?

    Reply

  31. Bedlinog
    May 25, 2025 @ 5:56 am

    I’m sincerely hoping that Omega doesn’t actually make an appearance in the next episode. Unless he’s a brain in a jar, like Morbius, bitching at the Rani. That would be fun. Or played by Peter Davison covered in Rice Krispies.

    Reply

    • Einarr
      May 25, 2025 @ 6:09 am

      The trailer suggests the Rani is going to be using “his body” for her purposes of constructing a new Gallifrey, which might imply he’s dead or comatose rather than an active agent in the storyline.

      Reply

  32. Cyrano
    May 25, 2025 @ 6:10 am

    I’m a bit surprised this one didn’t land a bit better here.

    I really enjoyed the 1950s heteronormative hell world – I thought it was very artfully drawn.

    The fact that it’s impossible for anyone to meet this fictional standard of perfection – everyone’s got bright orange Slip bins outside for their broken crockery.

    The way it drives even characters we know to be good to such a state of fear that they report their loved ones for doubts they themselves have.

    Mel’s scene – saying she’s alone so she’ll be glad to sit inside by herself and feel grateful. But she’s bringing out a broken cup to the slip bin so what was sitting at home thinking?

    The limits it places on everyone’s ability to express themselves: the Doctor’s ostracised at work for telling another man he’s attractive – even though it’s in service of the 1950s hell world heteronormativity.

    Belinda running into the woods to scream in lonely despair when she can’t perform motherhood to her own mother’s satisfaction? She’s shopped to the authorities for not being able to do the cisgender motherhood performance well enough.

    The image of the Doctor sitting up alone late at night drinking. Deeply unhappy and repressed and not able to recognise it until catching a hot guy on an illicit late night TV show breaks open his world?

    I thought there was so much more in this than just wheel spinning until the cliffhanger and Part 2. It’s a comprehensive tour of why gender fascism is miserable, incoherent and simply doesn’t work

    Reply

    • Einarr
      May 25, 2025 @ 6:16 am

      Agreed on all counts. It’s a much richer and more thought provoking episode than Legend of Ruby Sunday, which felt more like a trailer for next week to me, and certainly one with a) a duller aesthetic and b) very little to say in comparison.

      It also clears the extremely low bar of being the best Rani story of all time (yes I’m including the EU). Okay, make that “the first good Rani story of all time”.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Rei Maruwa Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.